Notices
Cayenne 958 - 2011-2018 2nd Generation
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

Non-Ethanol Fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2019, 09:59 AM
  #16  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,449
Received 1,071 Likes on 557 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark7000
There are many top-tier fuels without it,from Shell, Sunoco, Phillips, etc.

There is an app for locating the stations, too:
https://pure-gas.org
In our area, there aren't any more top tier gas stations anymore. The Phillips were bought out by Circle K, and now all the Shells as well. We can't even get ethanol free anywhere near us either. I'm relegated to carrying a bottle of Carb Defender when driving any of my older cars (pre-2000). My 911 with CIS and Ghia with a good old Solex don't care for E10.
Old 06-03-2019, 08:55 PM
  #17  
quickster2
Instructor
 
quickster2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I utilize 50/50 Stabil Marine 360 and Startron in all vehicles, ATV, Motorcycles, etc. During oil changes in the vehicles (typically 5K OCI) I use Techron or Redline S1. Never had a problem in many many years. Non-ethanol unleaded is close to my house & I will use this in the vehicles and boat which are not driven much in the winter. Costco is on our way frequently and is the preferred local gasoline. I agree with Don my K1300GT prefers and acts better with the 110 version of the non-ethanol. The other is rated at 91.
Old 06-06-2019, 12:03 AM
  #18  
8202632
Rennlist Member
 
8202632's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 1,026
Received 79 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

So here’s a question. If given the choice at shell of vpower 93 with ethanol vs 87 without ethanol, which is a better choice?
Old 06-06-2019, 06:03 AM
  #19  
quickster2
Instructor
 
quickster2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

93 top tier with ethanol especially with the stable of vehicles in your signature other than the Ford.
Old 06-06-2019, 09:01 AM
  #20  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,449
Received 1,071 Likes on 557 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 8202632
So here’s a question. If given the choice at shell of vpower 93 with ethanol vs 87 without ethanol, which is a better choice?
Always make sure you meet the minimum octane requirement for your vehicle.
Old 06-16-2019, 10:48 AM
  #21  
TheUnscented
Racer
 
TheUnscented's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Cincy
Posts: 464
Received 90 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles Navarro
Always make sure you meet the minimum octane requirement for your vehicle.
This month’s CarAndDriver magazine has a write up wherein they test four vehicles with 87 & hi test. 0-60 times, mpg etc. They concluded that your vehicle is safe with either but you’ll pay an outsized premium relative to any performance increase for the higher octane fuel.

They don’t compare pure gasoline vs corn-infused but the lower energy density, water absorbing, seal eating and fuel system gumming properties are already addressed here. Our letters to our betters in legislatures will get lost in a sea of apathy.
Old 06-16-2019, 10:27 PM
  #22  
jtsmith18
Racer
 
jtsmith18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 340
Received 88 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles Navarro
Always make sure you meet the minimum octane requirement for your vehicle.
Charles, in the case of a 2016 Cayenne base, which is the VW VR6, the VW Touareg and VW Atlas that also use this engine specify regular 87 octane. Do you see any harm if one were to use 87 in the Cayenne with the same engine. Porsche does spec it as 300HP vs 280 for the VW version.
Old 06-17-2019, 10:55 AM
  #23  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,449
Received 1,071 Likes on 557 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jtsmith18
Charles, in the case of a 2016 Cayenne base, which is the VW VR6, the VW Touareg and VW Atlas that also use this engine specify regular 87 octane. Do you see any harm if one were to use 87 in the Cayenne with the same engine. Porsche does spec it as 300HP vs 280 for the VW version.
Has more to do with the tune. The reason why the Porsche makes more power with the same engine is that it has more aggressive programming. Running lower octane fuel may cause the engine to pull timing, reducing power and fuel economy.

Putting higher octane fuel in an engine not designed for it won't get you any added performance, however engines designed and tuned for it should use it.
Old 06-17-2019, 08:29 PM
  #24  
RED HORSE
Race Car
 
RED HORSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SHV
Posts: 3,757
Received 128 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles Navarro
Has more to do with the tune. The reason why the Porsche makes more power with the same engine is that it has more aggressive programming. Running lower octane fuel may cause the engine to pull timing, reducing power and fuel economy.

Putting higher octane fuel in an engine not designed for it won't get you any added performance, however engines designed and tuned for it should use it.
Exactly. Few seem to understand what "octane" is.



Quick Reply: Non-Ethanol Fuel



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:20 PM.