Notices
Cayenne 958 - 2011-2018 2nd Generation
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

Anybody running a Malone tune on their diesel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2018, 03:35 PM
  #31  
th3n1nj2
Track Day
 
th3n1nj2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So do these increase the fuel efficiency?
Old 01-14-2018, 10:05 PM
  #32  
Eskimo1
Burning Brakes
 
Eskimo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Central PA
Posts: 952
Received 107 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by th3n1nj2
So do these increase the fuel efficiency?
Yep!
Old 01-15-2018, 08:06 AM
  #33  
th3n1nj2
Track Day
 
th3n1nj2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eskimo1
Yep!
and also increase power and torque? Insane, this seems like a no brainer
Old 01-20-2018, 06:00 AM
  #34  
Ddesimone17
Pro
 
Ddesimone17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Saratoga Springs, Ny
Posts: 665
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Been running the both Bluespark Pro , now upgraded to pro + boost for the past week . I honestly can say I can not tell the difference and mpg is the same.
i have been running them both on the same setting. So save your dough and just go with the pro.
Old 01-20-2018, 12:51 PM
  #35  
docwyte
Rennlist Member
 
docwyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: denver, co
Posts: 7,391
Received 489 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

Interesting. Would think that increasing both boost and rail pressure would make a noticeable difference.
Old 01-20-2018, 01:44 PM
  #36  
Ddesimone17
Pro
 
Ddesimone17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Saratoga Springs, Ny
Posts: 665
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

So,did i thus shelled out another $400, will play w the setting if not will return it
Old 01-20-2018, 04:21 PM
  #37  
swmic

Rennlist Member

 
swmic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,526
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Do the specs of the +boost box indicate a bump in performance compared to the pro box? Maybe safer?
Old 01-20-2018, 05:27 PM
  #38  
docwyte
Rennlist Member
 
docwyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: denver, co
Posts: 7,391
Received 489 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

From what I understand, the +boost box add +2-3 lbs of boost depending on which map you're on. I know Greg was running map E8 on the + box...
Old 01-21-2018, 11:46 AM
  #39  
Falcondrivr
Race Car
 
Falcondrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,929
Received 70 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Subscribed.
Old 01-22-2018, 01:26 PM
  #40  
Eskimo1
Burning Brakes
 
Eskimo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Central PA
Posts: 952
Received 107 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ddesimone17
Been running the both Bluespark Pro , now upgraded to pro + boost for the past week . I honestly can say I can not tell the difference and mpg is the same.
i have been running them both on the same setting. So save your dough and just go with the pro.
If you're adding more fuel and not more air, your EGT's are getting higher, faster. On a short burst, you might not feel much of a difference, but on a longer pull, it should take longer for EGT's to get to the defueling point (which seems to be 1450°F)..
Old 01-22-2018, 01:40 PM
  #41  
User 52121
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
User 52121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,695
Received 134 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eskimo1
If you're adding more fuel and not more air, your EGT's are getting higher, faster. On a short burst, you might not feel much of a difference, but on a longer pull, it should take longer for EGT's to get to the defueling point (which seems to be 1450°F)..
You've got that backwards.

More fuel = richer = lower EGT
Old 01-22-2018, 01:50 PM
  #42  
Eskimo1
Burning Brakes
 
Eskimo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Central PA
Posts: 952
Received 107 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OmniGLH
You've got that backwards.

More fuel = richer = lower EGT
Not on a deezul, my friend.
The following users liked this post:
cathalferris (04-18-2022)
Old 01-22-2018, 02:04 PM
  #43  
User 52121
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
User 52121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,695
Received 134 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eskimo1
Not on a deezul, my friend.
Hmmmm.

You are right. I stand corrected.
Old 01-22-2018, 02:14 PM
  #44  
User 52121
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
User 52121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,695
Received 134 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Would be interesting to see some EGT data logs between the models, just to validate this theory.

Someone (forget who?) posted that they were able to log EGT with a generic bluetooth OBD2 scanner?
Old 01-22-2018, 02:34 PM
  #45  
Eskimo1
Burning Brakes
 
Eskimo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Central PA
Posts: 952
Received 107 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OmniGLH
Would be interesting to see some EGT data logs between the models, just to validate this theory.

Someone (forget who?) posted that they were able to log EGT with a generic bluetooth OBD2 scanner?
That would be me.. The EGT's are definitely kept 'in check' by some DME programming. I guess it's just a matter of how fast you get to that limit! (Which leads me to think that removing all the DPF / EGR / etc. stuff will give you a definite performance boost due to it taking longer to hit a EGT limit)


Quick Reply: Anybody running a Malone tune on their diesel?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:34 AM.