Need some purchase input
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Need some purchase input
First time posting on this board - (normally at 928) was wondering if I could get some input on the new Cayenne. I need a new SUV lease for work and was comparing the Cayenne S, BMW X5 4.4is and MB ML500. I wanted some opinions (pros and cons). I have in the past had the earlier MB and wasn't too impressed by it but I did like the MB assistance (like on-star). Any comments would be apprieciated.
#2
Official Wednesday AM Red Bull F1 test driver
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Depends what you want to do with it- just drive it? (please don't ask about towing ) Drive them all and get the one you prefer. I haven't liked any of the bimmers lately (thanks to Bangle and I-drive) and have had several and loved them. the X5 is nice but I couldn't tow with it and the Cayenne was more heavy duty IMHO. I haven't been too impressed with MB for quite a while- the SUV looks like a minivan to me. I think the newer Cayennes have the bugs worked out and are a great vehicle for what they're intended for... The X5 is getting a little long in the tooth but still a good looking vehicle as Bange hasn't ruined it ... yet.
#3
Racer
Had a 2001 X5...drove great, lots of luxury, but body hardware and electronics did not hold up well (peeling interior paint, door seals falling off, crazed climate control read -40F in a Tucson summer, and more...) I've been very happy so far with my pepper, except with the tiptronic in automatic mode upshifts far too early for my tastes--thankfully one can still shift it "manually" with the steering wheel mounted buttons... IMHO, the Cayenne handles better both on-road and off, and seems to be more soliidly built...
#4
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Shore
Posts: 3,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Budget M3
Had a 2001 X5...drove great, lots of luxury, but body hardware and electronics did not hold up well (peeling interior paint, door seals falling off, crazed climate control read -40F in a Tucson summer, and more...) I've been very happy so far with my pepper, except with the tiptronic in automatic mode upshifts far too early for my tastes--thankfully one can still shift it "manually" with the steering wheel mounted buttons... IMHO, the Cayenne handles better both on-road and off, and seems to be more soliidly built...
I also had an X-5 (4.4i). I like the CS much better. Drives more like a sports car, whereas the X-5 feels more like a sedan. I can't wait toget into the thing at the end of the day, which is incredible for an SUV. I never really felt that way about the X-5. I also like the styling and cabin comforts better on the CS. Another consideration is that X-5's are all over the place now and it is due for a major facelift.
BudgetM3-- I know what you are saying about the automatic mode upshifts, but if you turn off the PSM (i.e. "Please Save Me"), you will find the upshifts are much more delayed and the car has A LOT more torque through each of the gears.
#5
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doug, I'm a former 928'er as well as a few others. Drove all of the three SUV's you are looking at several times setteld on a CS which should be here in the next few weeks. MB just did not do it for me and my wife is short and there was no seat adjustment she could make to see over the hood. BMW 4.8 was a great alternative, but it only comes with 20" wheels so you must buy another set of wheel/tire for winter which adds 1500-2000. I liked it alot and you would not be disapointed. But the Cayenne is a 928 in a different body, quick, comfortable, and runs/handles like any other Porsche. I'd envy your situation, a Cayenne and a great 928, the best two Porsche's you can own in my opinion.
#6
Cottage Industry Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by skl
Depends what you want to do with it- just drive it? (please don't ask about towing ) Drive them all and get the one you prefer. I haven't liked any of the bimmers lately (thanks to Bangle and I-drive) and have had several and loved them. the X5 is nice but I couldn't tow with it and the Cayenne was more heavy duty IMHO. I haven't been too impressed with MB for quite a while- the SUV looks like a minivan to me. I think the newer Cayennes have the bugs worked out and are a great vehicle for what they're intended for... The X5 is getting a little long in the tooth but still a good looking vehicle as Bange hasn't ruined it ... yet.
Also, Bangle is no longer doing the day-to-day design - he is more in a higher coordinating position, not the one actually drawing up the looks of the cars.
If you look closely, BMW has gone overboard at the beginning of the new design, and is now toning down and finding its new identity. This was bitterly necessary after 30 years of doing just variations of the same. The old look was dated, and would not win over new buyers from other brands. I think they did the right thing to make a change, but should have done it more gradually, rather than shocking people as they did.
Lastly, the X5 is the most dated vehicle in this discussion. I would not buy a vehicle that is due to be replaced by an all new successor in a year or two - vehicles last much longer, and they just take a big dive in value when an all new model replaces them.
But I agree, that one should drive them all before deciding. I've driven cars that others said were great, and I was disappointed - and vice versa.
Had I listened to the German auto magazine editors, I should never have bought a 928 - can't see where it begins and ends, is not comfortable, is not as much a Porsche as a 911, and guzzles gas like crazy, so they wrote. Well, I can park that thing in pretty small slots, I find it very comfortable, consider it an excellent car AND Porsche at the same time, and my gas mileage is significantly better than what they had published. Besides, I love it more than any car I've ever owned.
#7
I just sold my 2001 X5 and bought an '06 Cayenne. A close friend owns the Benz. Here are the strengths and weaknesses of each:
X-5 +'s Ergonomics, Fuel Economy, Car-like Ride Quality; -'s Fit/Finish, handling
ML +'s Cargo capacity, interior room'-'s Fit/Finish, economy, Mini-van Styling, Truck-like ride
Cayenne +'s Interior, Handling, Fit/Finish; -'s Cargo capacity (between X-5 & ML), Fuel Economy, Occasional Odd ergonomics, and (for some) the tight ride quality.
That said, I enjoy my 30 mile commute every single day in my Cayenne.
X-5 +'s Ergonomics, Fuel Economy, Car-like Ride Quality; -'s Fit/Finish, handling
ML +'s Cargo capacity, interior room'-'s Fit/Finish, economy, Mini-van Styling, Truck-like ride
Cayenne +'s Interior, Handling, Fit/Finish; -'s Cargo capacity (between X-5 & ML), Fuel Economy, Occasional Odd ergonomics, and (for some) the tight ride quality.
That said, I enjoy my 30 mile commute every single day in my Cayenne.
Trending Topics
#8
Burning Brakes
Get the Cayenne. I have been very impressed with mine. I am at about 24k miles now and not a single problem. It does a lot of things well, Porsche well for that matter. I had to swear off BMW's after Bangle. I don't care what anybody says, they hired that guy and all of the cars became extremely ugly. Anyway, they lost me as a customer. Too bad for them as my wife really enjoyed the V12 7 series models. In fact, that is what we traded for the Cayenne. I have also had bad experiences with MB lately, two of them. One was an '01 S600, the other an '02 G500. Not going back there anytime soon either. Thank god the Cayenne is living up to what I expect from a premium machine. I was running out of options.
#9
Racer
Originally Posted by rome
BudgetM3-- I know what you are saying about the automatic mode upshifts, but if you turn off the PSM (i.e. "Please Save Me"), you will find the upshifts are much more delayed and the car has A LOT more torque through each of the gears.
#10
Racer
Thread Starter
Hey George - I agree 100%. I think I'm pretty set on the Cayenne S and I hope to go for a test ride tomorrow - I stopped by a Porsche Dealer today and they were closed. I'm looking for that handling and performance that I think only the Cayenne can give - I spend a lot of time in my car not only commuting by going from job to job so I want to enjoy the ride.
One other question - I read in this months Porsche Panorama the there have been some vibrations in the wheel which may be due to an imbalance in the axel. Any comments on this? Is it anything to worry about?
TIA>
One other question - I read in this months Porsche Panorama the there have been some vibrations in the wheel which may be due to an imbalance in the axel. Any comments on this? Is it anything to worry about?
TIA>
#11
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by doug928
One other question - I read in this months Porsche Panorama the there have been some vibrations in the wheel which may be due to an imbalance in the axel. Any comments on this? Is it anything to worry about?
It is the Ultimate Driving Machine....no wait, that's a BMW.
It is the Ultimate Force in the Universe....no wait, that's the Death Star.
It's a Volkwagen with a Porsche crest......BINGO!
Buying a late 05/06, you should have no problems unless.....
You purchase 20" tires (vibration/balance problems)
You purchase the tow option (say hello to my little friend, the "!")
You actually want the rear hatch to open ONLY when you want it to.
You don't mind your windshield wipers sounding like an angry elephant having it's butt dragged across sandpaper
Uh oh, 11PM, bed check and lights out time.....good night.
#12
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
OK, I'm in a similar position to Doug. I have a '99 ML430 that I use to tow my 964 track car. Car trailer and "stuff" means about 5000 lbs to tow. I'm also considering the X5 (4.8), ML500 and CS. Since this "car" is my wife's daily driver, a pick-up or a "real" tow vehicle is out of the question. It's got to be a nice SUV that will tow. I've been using the ML430 for this for 2 years and have been happy.
What's wrong with CS towing?
What's wrong with CS towing?
#13
Pepper Bartender
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Tom W
What's wrong with CS towing?
#14
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Mechanically, the Cayenne is quite good at towing.
I tow a 20' enclosed V nose Cargopro aluminum trailer with the Cup car (or 996TT or 968 Cab en route to the detailers), ~2400# empty, 5000# to 6000# depending on what car is back there. Very stable at highway speeds. 9-11 mpg towing.
https://rennlist.com/forums/attachme...chmentid=18142
https://rennlist.com/forums/attachme...chmentid=18140
rennlist user 'skl' tows a 18' V nose ATC enclosed aluminum; we both have PASM on our Cayenne S.
Electrically, the only "issue" would be dependent on the lighting type/configuration on your trailer. Some configurations (too many incandescent bulbs or the use of LED lighting) leads to a "!" "Check Trailer Lights" message everytime you tow.
Installing an electric brake controller is very straightforward and has been discussed here many times.
The other issue is the lack of proper towing mirror extentions. About the only thing availabe are the 'universal' clip on type....vibration at highway speeds makes them marginal.
I tow a 20' enclosed V nose Cargopro aluminum trailer with the Cup car (or 996TT or 968 Cab en route to the detailers), ~2400# empty, 5000# to 6000# depending on what car is back there. Very stable at highway speeds. 9-11 mpg towing.
https://rennlist.com/forums/attachme...chmentid=18142
https://rennlist.com/forums/attachme...chmentid=18140
rennlist user 'skl' tows a 18' V nose ATC enclosed aluminum; we both have PASM on our Cayenne S.
Electrically, the only "issue" would be dependent on the lighting type/configuration on your trailer. Some configurations (too many incandescent bulbs or the use of LED lighting) leads to a "!" "Check Trailer Lights" message everytime you tow.
Installing an electric brake controller is very straightforward and has been discussed here many times.
The other issue is the lack of proper towing mirror extentions. About the only thing availabe are the 'universal' clip on type....vibration at highway speeds makes them marginal.
#15
Rennlist Member
Was in same position. Had ML430, drove them all. I choose the cayS. Although mine has had NO problems many others have had early model problems. I think most of them are now a non issue.
If towing not an issue, I would go with the cay V-6. That will be my next move in 12 months (I think) or I will buy out my cay.
I have been more that pleased with the car and out performs the other choices by miles!
good luck
tom
If towing not an issue, I would go with the cay V-6. That will be my next move in 12 months (I think) or I will buy out my cay.
I have been more that pleased with the car and out performs the other choices by miles!
good luck
tom