Notices

718 as an Autocross Tool

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2018, 02:10 PM
  #46  
chriswd62
Rennlist Member
 
chriswd62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 540
Received 259 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LehmanZ06
LOOKS GREAT !

The going down 1” is totally good. The only thing that wouldn’t be kosher for national nit picky competition is combining a 8.5 front with a 10 rear.
8.5 front with a 10.5 rear is ok, but not 8.5 with 10 or 8 with 10.5

Locally you shouldn’t have a problem.

Thats lava orange right ? It looks fantastic !!!
Thanks, but it's Guards Red. It does look orange in certain light.

I believe the rules state the +1"/-1" wheel change is available on the "standard part". It does not say anything about the entire set being used together, so I could purchase the car with a set of 19x8/10s and a set of 20x8.5/10.5s from the factory. Assuming I had both sets in my garage, I could use the 20x8.5s (or 19x8.5 with the -1" rule) in the front and put the 19x10's in the rear if I chose to do so, even though they are different styles. They should all be considered "standard parts".
Old 04-16-2018, 05:21 PM
  #47  
PedalFaster
Pro
 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 622
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chriswd62
I believe the rules state the +1"/-1" wheel change is available on the "standard part". It does not say anything about the entire set being used together, so I could purchase the car with a set of 19x8/10s and a set of 20x8.5/10.5s from the factory. Assuming I had both sets in my garage, I could use the 20x8.5s (or 19x8.5 with the -1" rule) in the front and put the 19x10's in the rear if I chose to do so, even though they are different styles. They should all be considered "standard parts".
Your interpretation of the rule is incorrect -- Lehman is right. From the preamble to the Street rules:

Except for modifications authorized below, Street Category cars must be run as specified by the manufacturer with only standard equipment as defined by these Rules. This requirement refers not just to individual parts, but to combinations thereof which would have been ordered together on a specific car.
(Emphasis mine.)

Based on what you wrote, you could not order a 718 delivered with 8.5" wheels on the front, and 10" wheels on the back, so running in that configuration wouldn't be legal.
Old 04-16-2018, 05:35 PM
  #48  
chriswd62
Rennlist Member
 
chriswd62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 540
Received 259 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PedalFaster
Your interpretation of the rule is incorrect -- Lehman is right. From the preamble to the Street rules:



(Emphasis mine.)

Based on what you wrote, you could not order a 718 delivered with 8.5" wheels on the front, and 10" wheels on the back, so running in that configuration wouldn't be legal.

Hmm. If that's correct, then that's a bummer. I'd hate to have to spend another $3K for two new .5" wider rear wheels just to meet this interpretation of the rules, even though it would be in my favor from a performance prospective. I'd hate to think that I could be protested for running a wheel that is narrower that what the max option would be.
Old 04-16-2018, 11:22 PM
  #49  
burglar
Burning Brakes
 
burglar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 793
Received 57 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Unfortunately, if someone were to protest you, it would be upheld.

Oddly, you could legally run a 20x10.5 on the left rear, a 21x10.5 on the right rear, a19x8.5 on the left front and a 21x8.5 on the right front if that was your bag.
Old 04-17-2018, 08:07 PM
  #50  
sjfehr
Drifting
 
sjfehr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,029
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chriswd62
Hmm. If that's correct, then that's a bummer. I'd hate to have to spend another $3K for two new .5" wider rear wheels just to meet this interpretation of the rules, even though it would be in my favor from a performance prospective. I'd hate to think that I could be protested for running a wheel that is narrower that what the max option would be.
Yep, afraid so. And it's not just an internet interpretation, it's the rule. That would be a pretty weeny protest, though, protesting for too-small rear wheels.
Old 04-18-2018, 08:25 AM
  #51  
User 52121
Nordschleife Master
 
User 52121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,695
Received 134 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sjfehr
Yep, afraid so. And it's not just an internet interpretation, it's the rule. That would be a pretty weeny protest, though, protesting for too-small rear wheels.
Ive never seen a more whiny block of people than racers. Don’t put it past someone to not protest...
Old 04-25-2018, 09:59 AM
  #52  
Scooby921
Racer
 
Scooby921's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sjfehr
Yep, afraid so. And it's not just an internet interpretation, it's the rule. That would be a pretty weeny protest, though, protesting for too-small rear wheels.
I can see it from a weight perspective. Using 10" and not 10.5" does save some tiny value in weight and inertia. If the margin of victory was 0.01 seconds I can see it being meaningful. If you win by 1 second and someone protests they are just an *******.
Old 05-06-2018, 03:44 AM
  #53  
Jawnathin
Rennlist Member
 
Jawnathin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 192
Received 95 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by burglar
Quick look and a base 981.1 could get PTV and PCCB, and biggest factory option wheel was 20x8.5/20x10, sound correct?
Originally Posted by chriswd62
Yes. I believe the best 981.1 BS setup would include X73, PTV, PCCB, Sport Chrono, with 19x8.5/19x10s. I honesty think the GTS could be a contender in AS, with all of these goodies.
Started to look up 981 Caymans and this is news to me. Thought it could only run a 8" front and 9.5" rear so this is awesome. In addition to the width benefit, the 8.5" front and 10" rears have so many more wheel options.

So with that in mind I started looking up wheels and nearly all of the rear offsets on the 19x10s from TR are not legal. I like the OZ wheels.

OE Rear - 10 x 20" ET50
OZ Rear - 19 x 20" ET40

My question is, is it possible to stack both the optional 5mm spacer (XRP) option AND the 7mm offset allowance so it could legally run the +40 wheel? I took a look at the rulebook and it says - "On vehicles supplied with an OE wheel spacer, the wheel spacer shall be considered as a part of the wheel."

So +50 wheel w/ spacer = OEM +45. And with the 7mm allowance; up to +38 = legal? Did I get that right or am I doing a bit of double dipping?
Old 05-06-2018, 04:20 AM
  #54  
Jawnathin
Rennlist Member
 
Jawnathin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 192
Received 95 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Sorry for hijacking a thread on 718s with 981 questions but don't want to create a new thread for this. If preferred I can do that.

For the 981 - PASM vs X73. Any definitive conclusion as to which is better? I know X73 is 10mm lower and gets bigger bars but the loss of PASM shocks seems significant given how well they work. I am leaning towards PASM since it is easier to convert to X73 but if I am going to end up running X73 anyway then I'll consider starting there. It is also easier to find a PTV + X73 car than it is a PTV + PASM car.

Thanks.
Old 05-06-2018, 06:43 AM
  #55  
sjfehr
Drifting
 
sjfehr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,029
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jawnathin
Started to look up 981 Caymans and this is news to me. Thought it could only run a 8" front and 9.5" rear so this is awesome. In addition to the width benefit, the 8.5" front and 10" rears have so many more wheel options.

So with that in mind I started looking up wheels and nearly all of the rear offsets on the 19x10s from TR are not legal. I like the OZ wheels.

OE Rear - 10 x 20" ET50
OZ Rear - 19 x 20" ET40

My question is, is it possible to stack both the optional 5mm spacer (XRP) option AND the 7mm offset allowance so it could legally run the +40 wheel? I took a look at the rulebook and it says - "On vehicles supplied with an OE wheel spacer, the wheel spacer shall be considered as a part of the wheel."

So +50 wheel w/ spacer = OEM +45. And with the 7mm allowance; up to +38 = legal? Did I get that right or am I doing a bit of double dipping?
You're allowed to go +/- 1" of diameter. What you should really be looking for is 8.5x19 & 10x19 because of tire availability. You may have to get some wheels custom-made, but Forgestar and Apex are both price-comparable to OZ and look just as good.
Old 05-06-2018, 02:28 PM
  #56  
Jawnathin
Rennlist Member
 
Jawnathin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 192
Received 95 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Thanks Steve, I misquoted the wheel specs. I meant to say I like the 19x10" OZ wheels and I will certainly take advantage of the +/- 1" diameter allowance. The question I have is whether I can legally 'double dip' the offset allowance AND the 5mm spacer option to have a broader legal offset allowance.

Option Code XRP = 5mm spacers for all wheels
Rulebook says - "On vehicles supplied with an OE wheel spacer, the wheel spacer shall be considered as a part of the wheel."

The practical use case is...

OE rear = +50 (allowable offset = +43 to +57)
OE rear + XRP = +45 (allowable offset = +38 to +52)

So if allowed then the +40 of the OZ should be legal. I think the only catch is that if I claim that option code that it applies to the front too. However in the case of the OZ front wheel specs it still falls under that allowance.

OE front = +57 (allowable offset = +50 to +64)
OE front + XRP = +52 (allowable offset = +45 to +59)
OZ front = +53

Not sure if anyone has gone down this exercise before that could definitively answer. I can write a letter to request clarification but thought I'd check here first.


EDIT: I also need to verify it was possible to order the car with XRP. Can't find a 981 with them.

Last edited by Jawnathin; 05-06-2018 at 03:04 PM.
Old 05-07-2018, 09:34 AM
  #57  
burglar
Burning Brakes
 
burglar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 793
Received 57 Likes on 47 Posts
Default


Not sure about the 981, but on the 987 it says in the Porsche literature explicitly that you are not allowed to combine XRR (the big wheels) and XRP (the spacers.)

Looks like it's the sport techno (XRT) option on the 981 that gets you the 8.5/10 (ET57/50) combo. I don't see an XRP option in the brochure. The Stuttcars site lists XRP as an option for a 981, but I can't find it anywhere else, and I also can't find a wheel spacer option on the current 718 build site.

There ARE spacers listed in the Tequipment catalog, but it says they are only for use with 18" wheels, which means they are no bueno for the big 20s.


So based on that, I would say you need to stick within SCCA tolerances of the original 20x8.5et57 / 20x10et50 to properly be able to defend a possible protest.
Old 05-07-2018, 11:42 AM
  #58  
Scooby921
Racer
 
Scooby921's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by burglar
So based on that, I would say you need to stick within SCCA tolerances of the original 20x8.5et57 / 20x10et50 to properly be able to defend a possible protest.
Yes, and the rear offset kills every off-the-shelf 19" option. Every off-the-shelf wheel I could find in my months of research is a 19x10 +40 rear. To go custom forged is $1000~$2000 per wheel. If you want to be legal to national rules and not get protested at national events you are forced to run OE wheels or spend the money on custom. I'm just out for fun these days, so I knowingly bought illegal wheels. If someone protests I'll admit fault and give up the trophy. If the results are close enough I'll probably give it up on my own as the extra width might be worth a couple tenths. Of course the 20lbs I would have saved running forged wheels and the extra 3" of tire I am missing by using OE sizes are probably worth more than a couple tenths on a fully prepared car.
Old 05-07-2018, 01:34 PM
  #59  
Mport68
Rennlist Member
 
Mport68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sjfehr
Yep, afraid so. And it's not just an internet interpretation, it's the rule. That would be a pretty weeny protest, though, protesting for too-small rear wheels.
Actually, the protest would be for too large a front wheel... and IMO that's a legit complaint because although it's possible to stuff a 255 on an 8" wide wheel, it works much better on an 8.5" width
Old 05-07-2018, 02:00 PM
  #60  
burglar
Burning Brakes
 
burglar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 793
Received 57 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scooby921
To go custom forged is $1000~$2000 per wheel.
You can get a set of custom-spec Forgestars for the price of one fancy forged wheel. I hear the lead time is pretty long though.


Quick Reply: 718 as an Autocross Tool



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:25 AM.