Notices
997 Turbo Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

997.1 vs. 997.2 - Now after a few years?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2017, 12:10 PM
  #31  
HellaHashTags
Instructor
 
HellaHashTags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NorCal
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A lot of negative comments about the DFI engine in this thread sound like "well this engineer said this" and "this publication said that" from 8 years ago. I think we have gathered enough actual data in the past 8 years to come to a less biased conclusion: the DFI engine is reliable and responsive to simple power adders.
Old 06-27-2017, 01:01 PM
  #32  
Catorce
Banned
 
Catorce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,609
Received 73 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Quadcammer
Do you have evidence of this?

My understanding was that the parts cost on the DFI may be about the same, but the man hours to assemble the mezger was so much longer given all the individual parts (I'm convinced the whole thing is just a mess of bolts) that the labor cost was what cost porsche too much.

Evidence? No, not really, except like I mentioned, i am the only one that still manufactures the Mezger engine case ON THE PLANET and own the tooling for the only repro case that exists. I know what they cost to make. The case design is super simple. I have built dozens of Mezger engines in the past (air cooled), but the TT case assembly is no different.
Old 06-27-2017, 01:12 PM
  #33  
raclaims
Rennlist Member
 
raclaims's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,646
Received 313 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

For me it's the .1 without a doubt. Yes I own one so I'm biased.

However, I also own a new RS and a 12 cup car and a 16 cup

The 997.1 and the 12 cup just have a raw edge that is gone in the newer 911s.

I'll never sell my .1 and it's frankly the most under valued car in the 911 lineup if you ask me
Old 06-27-2017, 02:04 PM
  #34  
white997
Advanced
 
white997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I dont know failure rates, i bet most dont get posted. I personally seen a 991 9A1 fail. this was in a 100% stock car, the car just shut down after a spirited run and would not crank over and smoke was all over the place. The car has been at Porsche of SF for 2 months now with no resolution, they took the whole motor apart. Owner got the shaft, as he is stuck without a car until Porsche decides what to do.
Old 06-27-2017, 02:39 PM
  #35  
HellaHashTags
Instructor
 
HellaHashTags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NorCal
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by white997
I dont know failure rates, i bet most dont get posted. I personally seen a 991 9A1 fail. this was in a 100% stock car, the car just shut down after a spirited run and would not crank over and smoke was all over the place. The car has been at Porsche of SF for 2 months now with no resolution, they took the whole motor apart. Owner got the shaft, as he is stuck without a car until Porsche decides what to do.
Are you talking about a 991 GT3 or a 991 Turbo?
Old 06-27-2017, 02:40 PM
  #36  
white997
Advanced
 
white997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 1 Post
Default

991 turbo
Old 06-27-2017, 02:55 PM
  #37  
HellaHashTags
Instructor
 
HellaHashTags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NorCal
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by white997
991 turbo
That's the first time I've heard or read about a 997.2 Turbo or 991 Turbo having a catastrophic failure like that. The 997.1 Turbo issues are extremely well known and documented. I wonder why that is?
Old 06-27-2017, 09:32 PM
  #38  
Whosdady
Instructor
 
Whosdady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: St. Louis, Mo.
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I agree that most will be biased towards what they drive. I'm a fairly new TTS owner so I'm happy to share why I purchased a 997.2 over a 997.1. For me the harder decision was between the 991 and the 997.2.

For me the 997.1 felt sluggish and old. Less nimble and rough, not raw. Believe me, I would have gladly saved the $15K- $20K by going with an older model but it didn't seem worth it. The PDK, dynamic motor mounts and ceramic brakes are amazing. All of which are available on the 991 and that is why I feel it's a better comparison. As those are some of my favorite aspects of the 997.2.

And I would take a dfi motor anyday on a turbo car...
Old 06-28-2017, 01:01 AM
  #39  
Southpaw
Racer
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The North Coast
Posts: 289
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HellaHashTags
That's the first time I've heard or read about a 997.2 Turbo or 991 Turbo having a catastrophic failure like that. The 997.1 Turbo issues are extremely well known and documented. I wonder why that is?
Same here... first I've heard of a DFI motor failing. I'm not saying it's not possible or never happened, I'm saying the reports of the 997.2/991 turbo DFI failing are few and far between. The failures are a small minority..
The more widespread, general consensus among their owners and tuners is it's proven to be very reliable... Even when modded.
Old 06-28-2017, 02:18 AM
  #40  
CodeRed
Rennlist Member
 
CodeRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa monica
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

drink some more kool aid
Old 06-28-2017, 12:35 PM
  #41  
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 15,629
Received 1,370 Likes on 793 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CodeRed
drink some more kool aid
what koolaid? The 7.2 motor appears to reliable, no? Do you have evidence otherwise (1 anecdote otherwise)?
Old 06-28-2017, 01:50 PM
  #42  
Southpaw
Racer
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The North Coast
Posts: 289
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CodeRed
drink some more kool aid
Fortunate enough to have drank both flavor kool-aids... Both were very yummy
Old 06-28-2017, 04:11 PM
  #43  
786
Pro
 
786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 669
Received 166 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

drove both, bought a .1, the PDK was nice and all but i was bored with the lack of interaction. both great cars and you really can't go wrong with either.

tbh the 997 GT3's and GT4 i drove since i bought my 997TT are more enticing than a 997.2TT. the linearity of the power delivery coupled with that delicious gearshift make a compelling case. i may trade for one of those before i would consider another Turbo. they're obviously slower but have more than enough power for street use, and i prefer the overall feel more.

i disagree with whoever said the 7.1 felt old and sluggish compared to a 7.2, you can't compare a manual to the PDK car as pretty much anything feels sluggish compared to one of those. in gear acceleration was similar in my experience, and a tuned 7.1 feels really strong.
Old 06-28-2017, 04:14 PM
  #44  
raclaims
Rennlist Member
 
raclaims's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,646
Received 313 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

To say the 997.1 is sluggish never drove mine...seriously...a few run of the mill mods and it's a monster.

I didn't add bigger turbos or any wild 800HP kit...just exhaust, headers and a ECU flash and a set of coilovers and short shifter for a little more fun.

I think you can do without the headers and just do the exhaust and flash and suspension and it will rock your world
Old 06-28-2017, 04:18 PM
  #45  
786
Pro
 
786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 669
Received 166 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

agreed, less is more on these cars imo. Exhaust, headers, IC's, inlets, and a tune would be a stout setup.


Quick Reply: 997.1 vs. 997.2 - Now after a few years?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:21 AM.