Notices
997 Turbo Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Vehicle year and whether or not your coolant pipe joins failed
2007 - did fail
11
16.42%
2007 - did not fail
14
20.90%
2008 - did fail
6
8.96%
2008 - did not fail
20
29.85%
2009 - did fail
2
2.99%
2009 - did not fail
14
20.90%
Voters: 67. You may not vote on this poll

Coolant pipe epoxy failure - which years?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2017, 05:43 AM
  #1  
Nate Tempest
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Nate Tempest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 716
Received 118 Likes on 69 Posts
Default Coolant pipe epoxy failure - which years?

From what I've read, Porsche apparently improved the coolant leak issue by changing the epoxy used for MY 2008+. I'm wondering whether people have indeed seen a higher incidence rate on 2007 997.1tt's, compared to 2008 and 2009.

Edit: I supposed better wording would have been "has not yet failed", but you get the idea.
Old 05-05-2017, 07:04 AM
  #2  
vbb
Pro
 
vbb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I have a 2008 and I just had a coolant leak from an epoxy failure. Now I have pinned the coolant lines.
Old 05-05-2017, 11:13 AM
  #3  
Skwerl
Drifting
 
Skwerl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,352
Received 303 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

Decided to jinx myself and checked '09 with no coolant pipe issues, after 70k enthusiastic miles.
Old 05-05-2017, 02:10 PM
  #4  
Kevin
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest
Posts: 9,305
Received 305 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

For the 997.1TT you might want to add/ include the plastic coolant elbow/fitting that connects to the rear oil water heat exchangers. This failure is just as bad and is becoming more common.

Please note: Guys make sure that your shop techs remove/clean and re-epoxy all of the fitting prior to pinning. I have seen numerous "fixes" with one fitting fixed/epoxied and all fittings pinned. If the glue/epoxy fails with a pinned coolant fitting>> coolant will seep and leak until fixed. You won't get the dreaded loss of coolant since the fitting is secured. But it's a mess. We are seeing these quick fixes on the 996TT, only to have owners go back in and spend the monies "twice" to get fixed.
Old 05-05-2017, 05:09 PM
  #5  
vbb
Pro
 
vbb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin
For the 997.1TT you might want to add/ include the plastic coolant elbow/fitting that connects to the rear oil water heat exchangers. This failure is just as bad and is becoming more common.

Please note: Guys make sure that your shop techs remove/clean and re-epoxy all of the fitting prior to pinning. I have seen numerous "fixes" with one fitting fixed/epoxied and all fittings pinned. If the glue/epoxy fails with a pinned coolant fitting>> coolant will seep and leak until fixed. You won't get the dreaded loss of coolant since the fitting is secured. But it's a mess. We are seeing these quick fixes on the 996TT, only to have owners go back in and spend the monies "twice" to get fixed.
That's a good point. I'd ask if the shop doing the work is willing to warranty their work. Mine did. That helps to ensure they do it right the first time, and if they don't, at least you have some protections.
Old 05-05-2017, 09:51 PM
  #6  
estrellajon
Burning Brakes
 
estrellajon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

From my research, coolant line failure was completely addressed on 997.2. .1s are not immune. You will hear less issues on 09 since not many were made but not immune
Old 05-05-2017, 10:40 PM
  #7  
Nate Tempest
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Nate Tempest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 716
Received 118 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

It could have been improved without being completely resolved though. Kind of like IMS on 06+ non-turbos. Not saying it was, but I have read statements to that effect. So, wanted to get some (obviously skewed and unreliable) numbers. That's also why I included the options for owning the car but not having the problem - to try for a rate rather than an absolute count.
Old 05-05-2017, 11:16 PM
  #8  
Skwerl
Drifting
 
Skwerl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,352
Received 303 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

What's always interesting to me is that it seems like it can effect virtually any car. High miles, low miles, gently driven queens, track rats - I've seen coolant pipe reports on all of them.

I think I once saw a thread on 6speed about an 09 with the issue but I may be misremembering or it may have been preventative.
Old 05-08-2017, 04:07 PM
  #9  
Turboslut
Rennlist Member
 
Turboslut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 545
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

see thread and post here...
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-gt2-...l#post13134621
Old 05-08-2017, 06:21 PM
  #10  
Nate Tempest
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Nate Tempest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 716
Received 118 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

From a quick perusal of that (very long) thread, it certainly appears that the problem improved after 2007-2008 (perhaps even mid-production year 2008?), notwithstanding the fact that there were fewer Turbos made in 2009. Tough to tell though since it's only people who had the problem that posted.

Actually, yeah, looks like Porsche confirms exactly that. Here's the summary from NHTSA, from that thread:

On April 26, 2013, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE13-009 to investigate 10 complaints alleging incidents of sudden coolant loss while traveling on public roadways in certain model year (MY) 2001 through 2007 Porsche 911 vehicles. The complaints alleged that pipe ends joined by epoxy to certain cooling system components may fail suddenly and separate, resulting in large volumes of coolant leakage. The investigation was opened to assess evidence of a design or manufacturing defect in the coolant pipe fittings and any related safety consequences.

In response to ODI’s Information Request letter, Porsche identified a manufacturing quality issue with the supplier’s application of adhesive to coolant pipe fittings that resulted in elevated failure rates in approximately 6,800 early production 997 generation vehicles (MY 2007 and early MY 2008). ODI’s analysis of field data showed that the age-adjusted failure rate for these vehicles was approximately six times greater than MY 2001 through 2005 996 generation vehicles and MY 2008 through 2011 997 generation vehicles built after a process improvement for adhesive application was implemented by the supplier.

https://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/acms/c...13009-5428.PDF

Process improvement in mid 2008 MY production. Seems to match what we're seeing - lots of failures in 2007, some in 2008, and very few in 2009.

I have seen some anecdotes of the pipes coming off even in 2010+ cars, but presumably if a thing is glued on, it can come off in at least some circumstances. The failure rate is the thing - and it definitely appears higher for 2007 and early 2008s.
Old 05-08-2017, 10:44 PM
  #11  
TurnOne
Advanced
 
TurnOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So what is considered mid year?

My 2008 was built 10/2008.

Pretty please tell me it is after mid year swap, or you think it is.

Chris
Old 05-08-2017, 11:03 PM
  #12  
bruni911
Instructor
 
bruni911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ancaster
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Why is this not a recall to fix cars?
this could be extremely dangerous !!
Old 05-09-2017, 12:32 AM
  #13  
CodeRed
Rennlist Member
 
CodeRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa monica
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

another reason to buy an 09
Old 05-09-2017, 12:55 AM
  #14  
Nate Tempest
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Nate Tempest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 716
Received 118 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TurnOne
So what is considered mid year?

My 2008 was built 10/2008.

Pretty please tell me it is after mid year swap, or you think it is.

Chris
Take a look at the pdf I linked; it's all there:

Short term countermeasures (improved employee training) were implemented by the supplier in July 2007 and by late January 2008 the supplier had introduced an automated metering device for application of adhesive on pipe adapters. ODI estimates that vehicles produced after February 2008 should have parts produced using the new process
There are also figures showing exactly what I was trying to find with this poll - the failure rates for various periods. Basically post February 2008 it's still _possible_ for it to fail, but it appears very unlikely compared to the rate seen in earlier vehicles.
Old 05-09-2017, 01:05 AM
  #15  
TurnOne
Advanced
 
TurnOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nate Tempest
Take a look at the pdf I linked; it's all there:
Thanks, I overlooked. The PDF was very informative.

Chris


Quick Reply: Coolant pipe epoxy failure - which years?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:03 PM.