Tough Question...
02-17-2007, 09:29 PM
#16
Burning Brakes
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by allegretto
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too. I must say the TT is stupendous. With Pirelli Wintersports I went up my drive, 300+,ft uphill in 6-8 of snow (try that with your Z-06 Dog). My FWD 07 Camry wasn't as sure-footed. Plus I can sip a latte at 125+ while rockin' There is nothing, save pull tractors,that this car doesn't do excellently.
Fellas, the RS is partially a "decal option" as you say but there are some distinctions.
If they don't make 1200 more for the US market it will be a better keeper than a TT however.
There's always other options too...
Fellas, the RS is partially a "decal option" as you say but there are some distinctions.
If they don't make 1200 more for the US market it will be a better keeper than a TT however.
There's always other options too...
02-17-2007, 10:58 PM
#17
Rennlist Lifetime Member
Originally Posted by allegretto
No hedging;
Would you trade your TT for an RS?
To be used for track/street mixture.
No cost issues involved. Straight up.
Would you trade your TT for an RS?
To be used for track/street mixture.
No cost issues involved. Straight up.
HELL NO
02-18-2007, 05:45 PM
#18
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by allegretto
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too. I must say the TT is stupendous. With Pirelli Wintersports I went up my drive, 300+,ft uphill in 6-8 of snow (try that with your Z-06 Dog). My FWD 07 Camry wasn't as sure-footed. Plus I can sip a latte at 125+ while rockin' There is nothing, save pull tractors,that this car doesn't do excellently.
Fellas, the RS is partially a "decal option" as you say but there are some distinctions.
If they don't make 1200 more for the US market it will be a better keeper than a TT however.
There's always other options too...
Fellas, the RS is partially a "decal option" as you say but there are some distinctions.
If they don't make 1200 more for the US market it will be a better keeper than a TT however.
There's always other options too...
i vote no. stay with the tt for all the reasons noted by others.
personally, i like less powerful cars for track use. you become a better driver as you don't have the horsepower to overcome your mistakes. passing faster cars is lot of fun too!
Last edited by golfguy; 02-18-2007 at 06:05 PM. Reason: forgot to answer the question
02-18-2007, 10:57 PM
#19
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
This is interesting.
Frankly I expected someone to defect.
If I had asked this question on the GT-3 Board I know there would be a loud unanimous NO. But I didn't expect such fealty.
Cool. It is one special sombich of a car.
Frankly I expected someone to defect.
If I had asked this question on the GT-3 Board I know there would be a loud unanimous NO. But I didn't expect such fealty.
Cool. It is one special sombich of a car.
02-20-2007, 04:01 AM
#20
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Cali
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mastiffdog
It will definitely be the better keeper from an economic standpoint. The car will always be a collector's car if it stays a garage queen. Get the green one!
