997TT exhaust mod gains 40 lb ft!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

10-05-2006, 09:21 PM

#16

cooperlee

Instructor

Join Date: Feb 2006

Posts: 135

Likes: 3

Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

on no...u dont gotta go there cracker jack!!!! take care of those mamasitas playA!

Reply Like

10-06-2006, 10:54 AM

#17

9Eleven

Three Wheelin'

Join Date: Jun 2005

Location: Melbourne Beach, Fl

Posts: 1,793

Likes: 33

Received 61 Likes on 47 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by dk996tt

i was just referring to the hp gain. we all know that dynojet hp numbers are substantially higher than mustang numbers. so a 40 hp gain on a dynojet would be equivalent to a 25 hp gain on a mustang dyno.

So you're basing this claim on what? Rumor? What other so called experts say? Naysayers? I've seen the dynojet test many cars. I didn't seem out of the normal realm of hp figures that were claimed by the factory. It really depends on the operator and how honest he is when he does the test. Same day, conditions, gas, time between runs, but this can be said about any dyno operator, or any dyno for that matter. So you're claiming that the Dynojet numbers are up to 40 percent higher than a Mustang dyno. So using that claim, if you brought your car in for a test and the Mustang dyno gave you a result of 250 RWHP, the Dynojet would return a result of 400 RWHP? I don't think so.

It is more surprising that anyone would claim a 40 lb/ft increase in torque based on their so called "butt dyno,” and then claim that the dynojet is inaccurate. Just for the record, there are some that "claim" that the Mustang dyno reads high or low. Depending on who you talk to, if it was their car that read low, I'm sure they will say it was the dyno.

Last edited by 9Eleven; 10-06-2006 at 11:39 AM.