Notices
997 Turbo Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Have you had a coolant pipe failure on your 997.1TT
Yes, I had a coolant pipe failure on my 997TT
43
27.74%
No, I've not had a coolant pipe failure on my 997TT
94
60.65%
No, I've not had a coolant pipe failure, but I preventatively addressed the issue
18
11.61%
Voters: 155. You may not vote on this poll

997.1TT Coolant Pipe Failure Poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2018, 03:55 PM
  #1  
Tmistry
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tmistry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,058
Received 103 Likes on 49 Posts
Default 997.1TT Coolant Pipe Failure Poll

Hi All,

I'm interested in the incidence of coolant pipe failure on our cars. Thought a poll makes sense. By design, I've kept it very broad, so trying to get as large an n as possible.

Name:  photo70.jpg
Views: 2455
Size:  1,021.9 KB

Last edited by Tmistry; 04-15-2018 at 02:17 PM.
Old 04-15-2018, 02:20 PM
  #2  
Tmistry
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tmistry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,058
Received 103 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Bump for Sunday. Looking for a large response pool to see what the coolant failure rate really is on our cars. Please vote!

Name:  photo257.jpg
Views: 1978
Size:  265.7 KB
Old 04-15-2018, 03:44 PM
  #3  
Skwerl
Drifting
 
Skwerl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,352
Received 303 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

There was a pretty well-attended poll a few months ago started by Nate Tempest, specifically in regards to the "better glue in 09" legend. As I recall, something like half of 07/08s needed the fix and zero 09s.
Old 04-15-2018, 04:28 PM
  #4  
JG 996T
Rennlist Member
 
JG 996T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,146
Received 489 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

I also had a 996 turbo, no failure. 70k miles.
Old 04-15-2018, 04:51 PM
  #5  
Tmistry
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tmistry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,058
Received 103 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Skwerl
There was a pretty well-attended poll a few months ago started by Nate Tempest, specifically in regards to the "better glue in 09" legend. As I recall, something like half of 07/08s needed the fix and zero 09s.
Skwerl, I assume this means 1/2 of the cars that needed the fix, were 2007/2008? Not, 1/2 of 2007/2008 cars needed the fix.

I'd like to have a poll only looking at the total population of 997.1 cars, irrespective of years, and determine what percentage of the total 997.1 population actually needed the fix.
Old 04-15-2018, 05:00 PM
  #6  
Skwerl
Drifting
 
Skwerl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,352
Received 303 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

Here is the thread:

https://rennlist.com/forums/997-turb...ich-years.html

47% of responding 2007s failed
17% of 2008s failed
0% of 2009s

26% total but the supposed change in epoxy in late 2008 should be factored IMO, especially since most people with 997 Turbos have 2007s (sort of surprising so many 08s responded on that poll).
Old 04-15-2018, 05:37 PM
  #7  
ShatterPoints
Rennlist Member
 
ShatterPoints's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 245
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

My car (2007) had coolant pipe issues on the turbo and the return lines in the front of the motor. Also the oil lines were not great. Had the lines repaired and pinned while the motor was out of the car. I bought the car with the leaks and it had 55k on the odo.
Old 04-15-2018, 05:50 PM
  #8  
Tmistry
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tmistry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,058
Received 103 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShatterPoints
My car (2007) had coolant pipe issues on the turbo and the return lines in the front of the motor. Also the oil lines were not great. Had the lines repaired and pinned while the motor was out of the car. I bought the car with the leaks and it had 55k on the odo.
Thanks ShatterPoints. I would consider your actions to be addressing preventatively, depending on how bad things were. Tough to get a handle on this issue. The objective behind the poll is to determine if a catastrophic coolant dump is a reasonable fear of ownership.
Old 04-15-2018, 06:33 PM
  #9  
Big Swole
Rennlist Member
 
Big Swole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA area
Posts: 7,058
Received 2,011 Likes on 1,262 Posts
Default

Subscribed
Old 04-15-2018, 06:35 PM
  #10  
ShatterPoints
Rennlist Member
 
ShatterPoints's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 245
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tmistry
Thanks ShatterPoints. I would consider your actions to be addressing preventatively, depending on how bad things were. Tough to get a handle on this issue. The objective behind the poll is to determine if a catastrophic coolant dump is a reasonable fear of ownership.

I think a coolant dump would be a fear to have if you track the car often AND do not address the pipes re: their condition upon initial ownership. For my particular issue the coolant line on the turbo was the feed line and was so bad the dealership I bought the car from spent money to fix that issue. I would agree the rest of it was preventive, as the pipe leak on my return line was more of a seep and I was losing enough coolant to fall below the min line in the expansion tank over 1-2 weeks. At no point did coolant dump on me but it was a risk from the original leak non the less.
Old 04-15-2018, 08:23 PM
  #11  
Tmistry
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tmistry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,058
Received 103 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShatterPoints
I think a coolant dump would be a fear to have if you track the car often AND do not address the pipes re: their condition upon initial ownership. For my particular issue the coolant line on the turbo was the feed line and was so bad the dealership I bought the car from spent money to fix that issue. I would agree the rest of it was preventive, as the pipe leak on my return line was more of a seep and I was losing enough coolant to fall below the min line in the expansion tank over 1-2 weeks. At no point did coolant dump on me but it was a risk from the original leak non the less.
Good info to know. Thanks 🙏
Old 04-16-2018, 12:56 AM
  #12  
MadScience
Racer
 
MadScience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 267
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No failure yet on my '09 with close to 60k miles on it. I'll likely take preventative measures if/when the engine comes out for some other reason, but am not motivated to drop it just for that.

I don't track the car. I'd feel differently if I used the car in some way that kept the revs up consistently, but I don't.
Old 04-16-2018, 01:57 AM
  #13  
nzskater
Rennlist Member
 
nzskater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Japan 🇯🇵
Posts: 2,873
Received 166 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShatterPoints
I think a coolant dump would be a fear to have if you track the car often AND do not address the pipes re: their condition upon initial ownership. For my particular issue the coolant line on the turbo was the feed line and was so bad the dealership I bought the car from spent money to fix that issue. I would agree the rest of it was preventive, as the pipe leak on my return line was more of a seep and I was losing enough coolant to fall below the min line in the expansion tank over 1-2 weeks. At no point did coolant dump on me but it was a risk from the original leak non the less.
That's not really preventative; any leak be it a gradual seep vs an eventful coolant egress is still a failure of the coolant pipes/epoxy.
Old 04-16-2018, 02:13 AM
  #14  
ShatterPoints
Rennlist Member
 
ShatterPoints's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 245
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nzskater
That's not really preventative; any leak be it a gradual seep vs an eventful coolant egress is still a failure of the coolant pipes/epoxy.
Splitting hairs at this point.

OP has a particular severity that is being applied on a per case basis it seems. I would agree with you that if there is a leak at all then it "counts" as an issue. Regardless of the situation, I'm confident that most if not all owners will agree that the OE coolant lines WILL leak at some point in their life. The average mileage on a vehicle as corroborated on the internet and local shops is 45-55k. That is though is just an avg some will go sooner and others not at all. No matter the car anyone buys there will always be something to worry about where by you choose to roll the dice or do preventive maintenance.
Old 04-16-2018, 06:21 AM
  #15  
RajuPatel
Rennlist Member
 
RajuPatel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 278
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

I am experiencing this issue. see my thread at https://rennlist.com/forums/997-turb...eak-issue.html Have removed the engine at a PORSCHE workshop. I am changing all non metal parts etc. I am also pinning the TORQUE Solutions aluminium inserts. my car is run only 32k kms but had been lying around with he previous owner. I had it tuned after putting aftermarket turbos, BOV, waste gates etc. the coolant leakage has happened post the new power upgrade. not related though. while at it I am doing everything necessary, so that i do not need to bring down the engine again, at least fro the cooling system point of view...


Quick Reply: 997.1TT Coolant Pipe Failure Poll



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:34 AM.