GT 4 vs 997 GT 3 same customer?
#62
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,512
Received 1,722 Likes
on
913 Posts
So based off your above statement the 991 3 isn't a true GT car? I'm extremely excited about this car, having had two GT3s, and now a cayman I can't wait to see what this thing does. My dilemma isn't buy GT3 or GT4, it's buy GT4 or make my current cayman as badass as Mooty's.
#63
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
#64
#65
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
While I agree that's it's disappointing that the engine doesn't have track oriented upgrades I think it's worthy to note that the Tudor Caymans run an entire season on one engine and they are bone stock engines. So the 9A1 may be up to the task in stock form, I guess we'll have to wait and see.
When a 9A1 engined car competes at Le Mans then we'll have a true current GT car. The Mezger did it, and won. Current feeder series are great but you're out against other privateers running last gen 3-series and Mazdas. When you stand up against the factory Corvette, BMW, and Ferrari teams - and win - then you've got the true GT engine. Which is what 996 and 997 cars had.
#66
It will be a lot of fun DEs in the next couple of years. Gt4s, 7.3 grinding it out. And then 1.3s way a head of everyone! I guess 1rs will be a rare sight at tracks. And then add some good 6.3 drivers in the mix..
#67
Nordschleife Master
While I agree that's it's disappointing that the engine doesn't have track oriented upgrades I think it's worthy to note that the Tudor Caymans run an entire season on one engine and they are bone stock engines. So the 9A1 may be up to the task in stock form, I guess we'll have to wait and see.
That said, teams have not historically run all year on a single Mezger in a Grand Am Cup either. Usually 3 or 4 is the average. A PCA Club racer can get 50-100 hours out of one. A pro endurance race team is replacing them pretty religously at 40-50 hours.
I don't understand the Mezger obsession any more than I understand the rear engine worship. It's not a "motorsports based" engine as everyone always says. It started out as the 130bhp 2.0l heart for the original 911. It is a great design that has shown great adaptability and versatility to the point that the displacement has been doubled with the same basic architecture. But the constant 9A1 bashing and Mezger worship is as irrational as most of our other vehicular fetishes. It's an engine. To think that Porsche hasn't designed a highly advance technologically sound engine with their current family of engines is niave. Porsche makes good engines, Mezger or not. The lump in my '67 912 is a good engine too and powered the 356 for nearly two decades. But 911 guys don't give that one much credit either and only respect the Furhmann instead on the old cars.
#68
Rennlist Member
I agree mezger motor has just as many problems as any of these things
They **** coolant unless pinned, leak oil, and are unbalanced if 3.8 or over (speculation re issues with later models)
If it were in a Honda it would have been recalled
They **** coolant unless pinned, leak oil, and are unbalanced if 3.8 or over (speculation re issues with later models)
If it were in a Honda it would have been recalled
#69
Rennlist Member
I'd be looking at these when they're 30% off in a few years in the used market. These won't be limited in production so you know they'll be losing value as soon as you drive them off the lot. In 3-4 years, you pick up a nicely set up one at a discount and you're set for a track car.
#70
IMHO, couldn't disagree more re: Mezger vs.M96 or 9A1...one is a true motorsports based engine, long living(esp. in turbo-spec), infinitely rebuildable, able to dramatically increase power(turbo's) with a few quirks(coolant fittings, some leak oil)...vs the throw-away M96's and 9A1's with a long list of fundamental engine construction issues that cause catastrophic failures(failing cylinder walls, heads cracking, m96 IMS, crankshafts breaking, oil starvation/wet-sump...etc.)...
This is not to say the M96 or 9A1 aren't great running engines(they are), it just the construction techniques that leave lots to be desired.
This is not to say the M96 or 9A1 aren't great running engines(they are), it just the construction techniques that leave lots to be desired.
#71
Rennlist Member
Im confused about the "unbalance" of all GT3's that are 3.8 and 4.0's. Can you elaborate on this?
#72
Nordschleife Master
People always seem for forget the pulled head studs on the 2.7s, broken head studs on the 3.0, bad valve guides on the 3.2, and leaking cylinders on the 3.6 air cooled Mezger engines. It is irrational worship. The engine family has had tons of issues over the years. Took them decades to "perfect" it as it sits in the GT3.
#73
#74
Rennlist Member
#75
People always seem for forget the pulled head studs on the 2.7s, broken head studs on the 3.0, bad valve guides on the 3.2, and leaking cylinders on the 3.6 air cooled Mezger engines. It is irrational worship. The engine family has had tons of issues over the years. Took them decades to "perfect" it as it sits in the GT3.