Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

GT 4 vs 997 GT 3 same customer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2015, 09:24 PM
  #61  
DRPM
Drifting
 
DRPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: QC, CA / Abaco BS
Posts: 2,300
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by usctrojanGT3
I would not replace my RS with the GT4....the GT4 would be an addition to the stable.
^
+1
That makes sense to me.
Old 02-04-2015, 09:26 PM
  #62  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,512
Received 1,722 Likes on 913 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aero997c2s
So based off your above statement the 991 3 isn't a true GT car? I'm extremely excited about this car, having had two GT3s, and now a cayman I can't wait to see what this thing does. My dilemma isn't buy GT3 or GT4, it's buy GT4 or make my current cayman as badass as Mooty's.
i'll bet Mooty's cayman is being aggressively shopped....
Old 02-04-2015, 09:30 PM
  #63  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,333
Received 5,481 Likes on 2,269 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spyerx
Base car + a paint color + bucket seats + radio delete + ac delete if hardcore = perfect DE car.

Needs no other options.
no way
I want deviating stitching in the United color of Benetton
Old 02-04-2015, 09:35 PM
  #64  
997rs4.0
Race Car
 
997rs4.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,478
Received 110 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mvez
Can 18" wheels be used with the 380mm steel brakes.....that's the remaining question.

I asked the same question yesterday and the reply was yes, with forgeline and one more brand that I can't remember. Can't find the link now.
Old 02-04-2015, 09:36 PM
  #65  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,171
Received 504 Likes on 186 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aero997c2s
So based off your above statement the 991 3 isn't a true GT car?
Originally Posted by Marine Blue
While I agree that's it's disappointing that the engine doesn't have track oriented upgrades I think it's worthy to note that the Tudor Caymans run an entire season on one engine and they are bone stock engines. So the 9A1 may be up to the task in stock form, I guess we'll have to wait and see.

When a 9A1 engined car competes at Le Mans then we'll have a true current GT car. The Mezger did it, and won. Current feeder series are great but you're out against other privateers running last gen 3-series and Mazdas. When you stand up against the factory Corvette, BMW, and Ferrari teams - and win - then you've got the true GT engine. Which is what 996 and 997 cars had.
Old 02-04-2015, 09:46 PM
  #66  
997rs4.0
Race Car
 
997rs4.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,478
Received 110 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

It will be a lot of fun DEs in the next couple of years. Gt4s, 7.3 grinding it out. And then 1.3s way a head of everyone! I guess 1rs will be a rare sight at tracks. And then add some good 6.3 drivers in the mix..
Old 02-04-2015, 10:04 PM
  #67  
GTgears
Nordschleife Master
 
GTgears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 5,162
Received 114 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marine Blue
While I agree that's it's disappointing that the engine doesn't have track oriented upgrades I think it's worthy to note that the Tudor Caymans run an entire season on one engine and they are bone stock engines. So the 9A1 may be up to the task in stock form, I guess we'll have to wait and see.
Correction. There's no such thing as a Tudor Cayman. Furthermore, only 1 of the 3 Caymans that ran Rolex Grand Am at Daytona ran the season. That was BGB's car. They changed the engine not too long into the season after Daytona, on principal. And then they quite spectacularly blew an engine at Watkins Glen. They may have changed it one more time. I think it was a 4 engine season.

That said, teams have not historically run all year on a single Mezger in a Grand Am Cup either. Usually 3 or 4 is the average. A PCA Club racer can get 50-100 hours out of one. A pro endurance race team is replacing them pretty religously at 40-50 hours.

I don't understand the Mezger obsession any more than I understand the rear engine worship. It's not a "motorsports based" engine as everyone always says. It started out as the 130bhp 2.0l heart for the original 911. It is a great design that has shown great adaptability and versatility to the point that the displacement has been doubled with the same basic architecture. But the constant 9A1 bashing and Mezger worship is as irrational as most of our other vehicular fetishes. It's an engine. To think that Porsche hasn't designed a highly advance technologically sound engine with their current family of engines is niave. Porsche makes good engines, Mezger or not. The lump in my '67 912 is a good engine too and powered the 356 for nearly two decades. But 911 guys don't give that one much credit either and only respect the Furhmann instead on the old cars.
Old 02-04-2015, 10:12 PM
  #68  
audipwr1
Rennlist Member
 
audipwr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 4,491
Received 168 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

I agree mezger motor has just as many problems as any of these things

They **** coolant unless pinned, leak oil, and are unbalanced if 3.8 or over (speculation re issues with later models)

If it were in a Honda it would have been recalled
Old 02-04-2015, 10:21 PM
  #69  
Speeds5
Rennlist Member
 
Speeds5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 868
Received 166 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

I'd be looking at these when they're 30% off in a few years in the used market. These won't be limited in production so you know they'll be losing value as soon as you drive them off the lot. In 3-4 years, you pick up a nicely set up one at a discount and you're set for a track car.
Old 02-04-2015, 10:29 PM
  #70  
993GT
Rennlist Member
 
993GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,745
Received 545 Likes on 331 Posts
Default

IMHO, couldn't disagree more re: Mezger vs.M96 or 9A1...one is a true motorsports based engine, long living(esp. in turbo-spec), infinitely rebuildable, able to dramatically increase power(turbo's) with a few quirks(coolant fittings, some leak oil)...vs the throw-away M96's and 9A1's with a long list of fundamental engine construction issues that cause catastrophic failures(failing cylinder walls, heads cracking, m96 IMS, crankshafts breaking, oil starvation/wet-sump...etc.)...
This is not to say the M96 or 9A1 aren't great running engines(they are), it just the construction techniques that leave lots to be desired.
Old 02-04-2015, 10:40 PM
  #71  
The Greek
Rennlist Member
 
The Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 162 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by audipwr1
I agree mezger motor has just as many problems as any of these things

They **** coolant unless pinned, leak oil, and are unbalanced if 3.8 or over (speculation re issues with later models)

If it were in a Honda it would have been recalled
Im confused about the "unbalance" of all GT3's that are 3.8 and 4.0's. Can you elaborate on this?
Old 02-04-2015, 11:12 PM
  #72  
GTgears
Nordschleife Master
 
GTgears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 5,162
Received 114 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

People always seem for forget the pulled head studs on the 2.7s, broken head studs on the 3.0, bad valve guides on the 3.2, and leaking cylinders on the 3.6 air cooled Mezger engines. It is irrational worship. The engine family has had tons of issues over the years. Took them decades to "perfect" it as it sits in the GT3.
Old 02-04-2015, 11:32 PM
  #73  
997s07
Burning Brakes
 
997s07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Greek
Im confused about the "unbalance" of all GT3's that are 3.8 and 4.0's. Can you elaborate on this?
Cam actuator bolts backing out. Just learned this myself.
Old 02-04-2015, 11:36 PM
  #74  
The Greek
Rennlist Member
 
The Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 162 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997s07
Cam actuator bolts backing out. Just learned this myself.
If I recall, that was an issue limited to the RS. Don't recall any narrow body GT3's having that issue.
Old 02-04-2015, 11:37 PM
  #75  
997s07
Burning Brakes
 
997s07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GTgears
People always seem for forget the pulled head studs on the 2.7s, broken head studs on the 3.0, bad valve guides on the 3.2, and leaking cylinders on the 3.6 air cooled Mezger engines. It is irrational worship. The engine family has had tons of issues over the years. Took them decades to "perfect" it as it sits in the GT3.
Nevertheless, the basic architecture was used in real pro races. An opportunity the 9A1 still has not been given. The real question is why! I won't hide the appeal to me that a GT1 block is in my garage. But I'm genuinely interested in why the 9A1 isn't raced professionally in the cup cars and RSR.


Quick Reply: GT 4 vs 997 GT 3 same customer?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:13 AM.