Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

2011 3.8 RS Pressure Plate Failure = Denied Warranty Claim

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2014, 02:09 PM
  #1  
michaellitt
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
michaellitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2011 3.8 RS Pressure Plate Failure = Denied Warranty Claim

My pressure plate failed last Friday. It became difficult to shift into Neutral and a whistling sound developed from the transmission. I immediately pulled over and turned the machine off.

Called Porsche, had the vehicle towed to nearest dealer.

Was informed that the pressure plate had indeed failed and in the process took out the clutch and sent shrapnel through to the transmission. This is a well documented issue.

Warranty claim was submitted via the dealer into Porsche Canada and escalated to Germany. Warranty is valid until February 2015.

Porsche has denied the claim on the basis that the ECU has been modified.

1) I purchased the vehicle without knowledge of the modification. It is not a CPO car, I had a dealership find it for me. Their inspection assured that no modifications had been done to the vehicle. I'm the 3rd owner - assumption is that the 1st owner did the modification.

2) The engine has no over-revs (via the dealership that submitted the claim).

3) Cost of repair is >~$25,000.

I'm in a pickle here and am curious about potential courses of action. I assume it's too late to re-flash and re-submit the claim as the VIN will be flagged.

My dealer assures me that their diligence was complete. I have no records confirming software modification at any point.

Has anyone appealed a warranty claim like this under goodwill? I believe Porsche has acknowledged the issue given that they replace the broken pieces with a different/upgraded part # (parts from the 4.0).

I can't afford these repairs at the moment (wedding next week) and am at a complete loss.
Old 07-31-2014, 02:37 PM
  #2  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,482
Received 1,729 Likes on 1,057 Posts
Default

What evidence and basis are they claiming the ECU has been modified? Does it have a modified map? Reve limiter? What?
Old 07-31-2014, 02:49 PM
  #3  
surlynkid
Burning Brakes
 
surlynkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

First they said it was clean when you bought it from them and now they say it has a tune. Either they did not really check the car just like the clowns I used in Florida or they are full of **** now.
Old 07-31-2014, 03:30 PM
  #4  
michaellitt
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
michaellitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spyerx
What evidence and basis are they claiming the ECU has been modified? Does it have a modified map? Reve limiter? What?
They said that the "Software Code" did not match the factory one when they ran the diagnostic. I was not informed of this until the claim was denied.
Old 07-31-2014, 05:25 PM
  #5  
Yoops Racing
Pro
 
Yoops Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Cumming Ga
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

wow that bites. PCA can be PITA when it comes to ECU Flash. I wonder if you have it flashed back to stock if the dealer can help push it through now....you may want to inquire. I hope you and the dealer are on good terms...
Old 07-31-2014, 06:30 PM
  #6  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,404
Received 983 Likes on 509 Posts
Default

This is where the whole idea of flashing and the vendor telling you it can't be detected begins to unravel. While the dealer may not pick it up on a casual DME scan Porsche may be able to pick up more information.

I'd keep after my dealer and write Porsche. Keep it professional with the facts. Let them know that you had it inspected at a dealer and that you expected the car to be clean. Did your dealer make any money on the car?

Really sorry to hear about your dilemma. Hope it works out for you.
Old 07-31-2014, 07:04 PM
  #7  
Izzone
Nordschleife Master
 
Izzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,341
Received 291 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

It's not a 25k repair

If the pressure plate exploded...it probably only took out the bell housing

Take it to an independent and get it fixed
Old 07-31-2014, 07:25 PM
  #8  
997gt3north
Drifting
 
997gt3north's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

If the engine has no over revs (stated above - i.e. no money shift exploding pressure plate), then while not impossible, if is not 'likely' that shrapnel got to the transmission - it is likely that the bell-housing got dinged - and a dinged bell-housing is still usable unless it is seriously damaged.

My guess is that you are screwed and they know it - and they know that you know it. And the dealer is not going to say they made a mistake and you can't prove you didn't install the software unless you can get one of the 2 previous owners to say they did it - which might be your best course of action.

You should with help from here and the dealer be able to track down who owned the car previously - and hopefully they can confirm if they installed the software - at which point the dealer is going to be on the hook (try and get his info before the dealer figures out what you are doing.

The other angle is to phone the likely software providers (not that many) and see if they sold software for that car to the previous owners.

If none of the above works, get the car out of there, get a second opinion and see if the real price to fix it is $6k and not $25k.
Old 07-31-2014, 08:35 PM
  #9  
P.J.S.
Rennlist Member
 
P.J.S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,158
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So if the car has been "flagged" is your warranty voided?

I agree with others - $25k is suspect

Seek second opinion
Old 07-31-2014, 08:58 PM
  #10  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,482
Received 1,729 Likes on 1,057 Posts
Default

This really blows. This is one to fight with Porsche using any angle possible.

That 25k is a replacement tranny.

Is it possible to fix the scored bell housing? If so, that's a lot less $ I'm sure... or replace just the case, not the whole gearbox.
Old 07-31-2014, 09:31 PM
  #11  
kristob
Rennlist Member
 
kristob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 254
Received 101 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Sad state of affairs. There are good independents in the Toronto area. Take it for a second opinion. That repair bill seems rich. You can try going up the line at pcna, but they have you based on the ecu flash.
Old 07-31-2014, 09:47 PM
  #12  
surlynkid
Burning Brakes
 
surlynkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

You can pull the bell housing, get it repaired by welding and machining and put in new RS4.0 parts and be out the door for under $6K. $25K is BS even if the bell housing is toast. If it is, add another $2500 versus fixing it.

You don't need new trans just because straps on pp tore up bell housing. You only need bell housing.
Old 07-31-2014, 10:11 PM
  #13  
Texas RS
Rennlist Member
 
Texas RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,191
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Sorry to hear of your troubles. Suncoast can get you a remanufactured transmission for $14k, new is $18k. You still have clutch, pp and flywheel and probably a starter. With labor you will be pushing $20k.

If it is just the bell housing you can probably get it done for $5-6k as surlynkid indicated. There have been a few of these failures that I know of, only one was covered by Porsche warranty. One of the cars was a CPO car and was not covered.
Old 07-31-2014, 10:20 PM
  #14  
996FLT6
Rennlist Member
 
996FLT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: san francisco
Posts: 13,966
Received 230 Likes on 186 Posts
Default

So bogus in all fronts. I would be persistent about that car bought from dealership came in that way and they should honor the sale to u. It wasn't your fault but there's for not checking ecu in the 1st place. Anyway 3.8 pressure plate/clutch has been a known defect- it needed to be replaced anyway and Porsche should replace it. Mike
Old 07-31-2014, 10:44 PM
  #15  
parkerfe
Burning Brakes
 
parkerfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
Received 237 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by michaellitt
My pressure plate failed last Friday. It became difficult to shift into Neutral and a whistling sound developed from the transmission. I immediately pulled over and turned the machine off.

Called Porsche, had the vehicle towed to nearest dealer.

Was informed that the pressure plate had indeed failed and in the process took out the clutch and sent shrapnel through to the transmission. This is a well documented issue.

Warranty claim was submitted via the dealer into Porsche Canada and escalated to Germany. Warranty is valid until February 2015.

Porsche has denied the claim on the basis that the ECU has been modified.

1) I purchased the vehicle without knowledge of the modification. It is not a CPO car, I had a dealership find it for me. Their inspection assured that no modifications had been done to the vehicle. I'm the 3rd owner - assumption is that the 1st owner did the modification.

2) The engine has no over-revs (via the dealership that submitted the claim).

3) Cost of repair is >~$25,000.

I'm in a pickle here and am curious about potential courses of action. I assume it's too late to re-flash and re-submit the claim as the VIN will be flagged.

My dealer assures me that their diligence was complete. I have no records confirming software modification at any point.

Has anyone appealed a warranty claim like this under goodwill? I believe Porsche has acknowledged the issue given that they replace the broken pieces with a different/upgraded part # (parts from the 4.0).

I can't afford these repairs at the moment (wedding next week) and am at a complete loss.
If the dealer "assured' you that no modifications had been done to the car and you purchased it based on that assurance, your best cause of action is against the dealer. I would send the owner of the dealership a certified letter, with a copy to Porsche Canada and Porsche Germany, explaining how you detrimentally relied on their assurance that the car was stock giving them 10 days to agree to get the repairs done under warranty. If they refuse, file a formal lawsuit.


Quick Reply: 2011 3.8 RS Pressure Plate Failure = Denied Warranty Claim



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:46 PM.