2011 3.8 RS Pressure Plate Failure = Denied Warranty Claim
#1
Intermediate
Thread Starter
2011 3.8 RS Pressure Plate Failure = Denied Warranty Claim
My pressure plate failed last Friday. It became difficult to shift into Neutral and a whistling sound developed from the transmission. I immediately pulled over and turned the machine off.
Called Porsche, had the vehicle towed to nearest dealer.
Was informed that the pressure plate had indeed failed and in the process took out the clutch and sent shrapnel through to the transmission. This is a well documented issue.
Warranty claim was submitted via the dealer into Porsche Canada and escalated to Germany. Warranty is valid until February 2015.
Porsche has denied the claim on the basis that the ECU has been modified.
1) I purchased the vehicle without knowledge of the modification. It is not a CPO car, I had a dealership find it for me. Their inspection assured that no modifications had been done to the vehicle. I'm the 3rd owner - assumption is that the 1st owner did the modification.
2) The engine has no over-revs (via the dealership that submitted the claim).
3) Cost of repair is >~$25,000.
I'm in a pickle here and am curious about potential courses of action. I assume it's too late to re-flash and re-submit the claim as the VIN will be flagged.
My dealer assures me that their diligence was complete. I have no records confirming software modification at any point.
Has anyone appealed a warranty claim like this under goodwill? I believe Porsche has acknowledged the issue given that they replace the broken pieces with a different/upgraded part # (parts from the 4.0).
I can't afford these repairs at the moment (wedding next week) and am at a complete loss.
Called Porsche, had the vehicle towed to nearest dealer.
Was informed that the pressure plate had indeed failed and in the process took out the clutch and sent shrapnel through to the transmission. This is a well documented issue.
Warranty claim was submitted via the dealer into Porsche Canada and escalated to Germany. Warranty is valid until February 2015.
Porsche has denied the claim on the basis that the ECU has been modified.
1) I purchased the vehicle without knowledge of the modification. It is not a CPO car, I had a dealership find it for me. Their inspection assured that no modifications had been done to the vehicle. I'm the 3rd owner - assumption is that the 1st owner did the modification.
2) The engine has no over-revs (via the dealership that submitted the claim).
3) Cost of repair is >~$25,000.
I'm in a pickle here and am curious about potential courses of action. I assume it's too late to re-flash and re-submit the claim as the VIN will be flagged.
My dealer assures me that their diligence was complete. I have no records confirming software modification at any point.
Has anyone appealed a warranty claim like this under goodwill? I believe Porsche has acknowledged the issue given that they replace the broken pieces with a different/upgraded part # (parts from the 4.0).
I can't afford these repairs at the moment (wedding next week) and am at a complete loss.
#2
Rennlist Member
What evidence and basis are they claiming the ECU has been modified? Does it have a modified map? Reve limiter? What?
#3
Burning Brakes
First they said it was clean when you bought it from them and now they say it has a tune. Either they did not really check the car just like the clowns I used in Florida or they are full of **** now.
#4
Intermediate
Thread Starter
#5
wow that bites. PCA can be PITA when it comes to ECU Flash. I wonder if you have it flashed back to stock if the dealer can help push it through now....you may want to inquire. I hope you and the dealer are on good terms...
#6
Rennlist Member
This is where the whole idea of flashing and the vendor telling you it can't be detected begins to unravel. While the dealer may not pick it up on a casual DME scan Porsche may be able to pick up more information.
I'd keep after my dealer and write Porsche. Keep it professional with the facts. Let them know that you had it inspected at a dealer and that you expected the car to be clean. Did your dealer make any money on the car?
Really sorry to hear about your dilemma. Hope it works out for you.
I'd keep after my dealer and write Porsche. Keep it professional with the facts. Let them know that you had it inspected at a dealer and that you expected the car to be clean. Did your dealer make any money on the car?
Really sorry to hear about your dilemma. Hope it works out for you.
Trending Topics
#8
If the engine has no over revs (stated above - i.e. no money shift exploding pressure plate), then while not impossible, if is not 'likely' that shrapnel got to the transmission - it is likely that the bell-housing got dinged - and a dinged bell-housing is still usable unless it is seriously damaged.
My guess is that you are screwed and they know it - and they know that you know it. And the dealer is not going to say they made a mistake and you can't prove you didn't install the software unless you can get one of the 2 previous owners to say they did it - which might be your best course of action.
You should with help from here and the dealer be able to track down who owned the car previously - and hopefully they can confirm if they installed the software - at which point the dealer is going to be on the hook (try and get his info before the dealer figures out what you are doing.
The other angle is to phone the likely software providers (not that many) and see if they sold software for that car to the previous owners.
If none of the above works, get the car out of there, get a second opinion and see if the real price to fix it is $6k and not $25k.
My guess is that you are screwed and they know it - and they know that you know it. And the dealer is not going to say they made a mistake and you can't prove you didn't install the software unless you can get one of the 2 previous owners to say they did it - which might be your best course of action.
You should with help from here and the dealer be able to track down who owned the car previously - and hopefully they can confirm if they installed the software - at which point the dealer is going to be on the hook (try and get his info before the dealer figures out what you are doing.
The other angle is to phone the likely software providers (not that many) and see if they sold software for that car to the previous owners.
If none of the above works, get the car out of there, get a second opinion and see if the real price to fix it is $6k and not $25k.
#10
Rennlist Member
This really blows. This is one to fight with Porsche using any angle possible.
That 25k is a replacement tranny.
Is it possible to fix the scored bell housing? If so, that's a lot less $ I'm sure... or replace just the case, not the whole gearbox.
That 25k is a replacement tranny.
Is it possible to fix the scored bell housing? If so, that's a lot less $ I'm sure... or replace just the case, not the whole gearbox.
#11
Rennlist Member
Sad state of affairs. There are good independents in the Toronto area. Take it for a second opinion. That repair bill seems rich. You can try going up the line at pcna, but they have you based on the ecu flash.
#12
Burning Brakes
You can pull the bell housing, get it repaired by welding and machining and put in new RS4.0 parts and be out the door for under $6K. $25K is BS even if the bell housing is toast. If it is, add another $2500 versus fixing it.
You don't need new trans just because straps on pp tore up bell housing. You only need bell housing.
You don't need new trans just because straps on pp tore up bell housing. You only need bell housing.
#13
Rennlist Member
Sorry to hear of your troubles. Suncoast can get you a remanufactured transmission for $14k, new is $18k. You still have clutch, pp and flywheel and probably a starter. With labor you will be pushing $20k.
If it is just the bell housing you can probably get it done for $5-6k as surlynkid indicated. There have been a few of these failures that I know of, only one was covered by Porsche warranty. One of the cars was a CPO car and was not covered.
If it is just the bell housing you can probably get it done for $5-6k as surlynkid indicated. There have been a few of these failures that I know of, only one was covered by Porsche warranty. One of the cars was a CPO car and was not covered.
#14
Rennlist Member
So bogus in all fronts. I would be persistent about that car bought from dealership came in that way and they should honor the sale to u. It wasn't your fault but there's for not checking ecu in the 1st place. Anyway 3.8 pressure plate/clutch has been a known defect- it needed to be replaced anyway and Porsche should replace it. Mike
#15
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
Received 237 Likes
on
142 Posts
My pressure plate failed last Friday. It became difficult to shift into Neutral and a whistling sound developed from the transmission. I immediately pulled over and turned the machine off.
Called Porsche, had the vehicle towed to nearest dealer.
Was informed that the pressure plate had indeed failed and in the process took out the clutch and sent shrapnel through to the transmission. This is a well documented issue.
Warranty claim was submitted via the dealer into Porsche Canada and escalated to Germany. Warranty is valid until February 2015.
Porsche has denied the claim on the basis that the ECU has been modified.
1) I purchased the vehicle without knowledge of the modification. It is not a CPO car, I had a dealership find it for me. Their inspection assured that no modifications had been done to the vehicle. I'm the 3rd owner - assumption is that the 1st owner did the modification.
2) The engine has no over-revs (via the dealership that submitted the claim).
3) Cost of repair is >~$25,000.
I'm in a pickle here and am curious about potential courses of action. I assume it's too late to re-flash and re-submit the claim as the VIN will be flagged.
My dealer assures me that their diligence was complete. I have no records confirming software modification at any point.
Has anyone appealed a warranty claim like this under goodwill? I believe Porsche has acknowledged the issue given that they replace the broken pieces with a different/upgraded part # (parts from the 4.0).
I can't afford these repairs at the moment (wedding next week) and am at a complete loss.
Called Porsche, had the vehicle towed to nearest dealer.
Was informed that the pressure plate had indeed failed and in the process took out the clutch and sent shrapnel through to the transmission. This is a well documented issue.
Warranty claim was submitted via the dealer into Porsche Canada and escalated to Germany. Warranty is valid until February 2015.
Porsche has denied the claim on the basis that the ECU has been modified.
1) I purchased the vehicle without knowledge of the modification. It is not a CPO car, I had a dealership find it for me. Their inspection assured that no modifications had been done to the vehicle. I'm the 3rd owner - assumption is that the 1st owner did the modification.
2) The engine has no over-revs (via the dealership that submitted the claim).
3) Cost of repair is >~$25,000.
I'm in a pickle here and am curious about potential courses of action. I assume it's too late to re-flash and re-submit the claim as the VIN will be flagged.
My dealer assures me that their diligence was complete. I have no records confirming software modification at any point.
Has anyone appealed a warranty claim like this under goodwill? I believe Porsche has acknowledged the issue given that they replace the broken pieces with a different/upgraded part # (parts from the 4.0).
I can't afford these repairs at the moment (wedding next week) and am at a complete loss.