Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

New GT2-pass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2007, 02:39 AM
  #31  
pole position
Burning Brakes
 
pole position's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AmirGT2
Per a very reliable source, PCNA no longer cares about dealer "mark-ups" because the cars are being flipped by the customers for the same ridiculous prices on ebay. Understandably, they would rather the dealers make the profit rather than speculators who are going to kill the market as they did with the CGT and previous GT2. According to my source, Porsche is limiting their production numbers for the 911 series and even more so for the GT cars in the U.S. This is primarily due to the foreign emerging markets as well as the declining dollar. As a matter of fact, Dubai has now surpassed Champion as their highest volume dealer.

Of course like anything else, there will be a good news and bad news scenario with this development. The good news is that this will keep the values more stable like the old days (pre-996 models) but the bad news is that it means more mark ups on harder to get cars.

I am sure that many of the more reputable dealers are going to stay loyal to their VIP customers who are not into the flipping business. My dealer, whom I have purchased many cars from, is giving me their first GT2 at MSRP.

Best,

Amir
So are you flipping the GT2 like you attempted/flip your RS ? Or is this just good business sense for a individual to make $$$ over but buying for MSRP ?

Bad dealers but never a bad customer , lol, do you include your buddy Terrance in that elusive speculator class "who kill the market" or do you give this flipper of all flippers a godly pass ?
Old 11-02-2007, 02:28 PM
  #32  
AmirGT2
Instructor
 
AmirGT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: LA
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think you misunderstood what I was saying. I was actually defending the dealers by saying that they have the right to make the profits over speculators. They are in the business of selling cars afterall.

That being said, I don't think its right to put everybody in the same boat. If a customer has been loyal and purchased cars in the past without flipping them right off of the showroom floor for massive profits, then they should be dealt with differently.

And for the record, I still own my RS and couldn't be happier with it. I also plan on keeping my GT2 as I have my CGT for over three years now as well.

As for my buddy Terrence, I don't find anything wrong with him driving his cars for a few thousand miles and selling them before they plummet ( Personally, I wish I was smart enough to do the same). I regard a "flipper", as someone who sells the car without even driving them.

Best,

Amir
Old 11-02-2007, 04:54 PM
  #33  
dasams
Rennlist Member
 
dasams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Coachella Valley
Posts: 2,216
Received 372 Likes on 261 Posts
Default Free Market Pricing

Originally Posted by NelsonF
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My local dealer just called to tell me that their incoming GT2 will sell at market(msrp+50k). As a repeat customer, I was offered msrp +$45k. I had the number one spot, but will be passing since they indicated msrp at the time of deposit 18months ago. Just a head's up for those interested. Clowns.
__________________
Would everyone would feel better if the MSRP was 50 grand higher and then the dealers discounted down to the market price? This is one way to take the flippers out of the market. On the other hand, perhaps the MSRP will turn out to be the market price.

And shame on Porsche for setting any MSRP that creates a gap in the supply / demand curve as they've done with the CGT (price too high) and GT3RS (price too low).

dave
Old 11-02-2007, 05:18 PM
  #34  
nkhalidi
Rennlist Member
 
nkhalidi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC / FL
Posts: 1,308
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mvd
And shame on Porsche for setting any MSRP that creates a gap in the supply / demand curve as they've done with the CGT (price too high) and GT3RS (price too low).
First, not only is your condemnation nearly economically and practically impossible, it's also completely contrary to the notion of letting the market decide on an appropriate trading price for a good (think houses). Begins to smell like the opposite of capitalism.

Second, CGTs were in fact trading OVER sticker when they were first released. They began to depreciate after they had been on the market for a little while. The issue there wasn't so much the car's MSRP but rather its relatively high production numbers.
Old 11-02-2007, 05:19 PM
  #35  
NelsonF
Pro
Thread Starter
 
NelsonF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fallbrook, Ca.
Posts: 507
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default new 2

That would not work as the profit margins on the car would just go to Porsche as opposed to the greedy stealer. Also, it would not preclude the stealer from continuing to add their market adjustment if they could get away with it. Stealers using this strategy are catering to the "gotta have it first and will pay any mark-up group".
Old 11-02-2007, 06:14 PM
  #36  
dasams
Rennlist Member
 
dasams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Coachella Valley
Posts: 2,216
Received 372 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nkhalidi
First, not only is your condemnation nearly economically and practically impossible, it's also completely contrary to the notion of letting the market decide on an appropriate trading price for a good (think houses).
We're in agreement that the market should set the price which is the point of my post. That's why I also said "perhaps the MSRP will turn out to be the market price" meaning that they got it right (and let the early adoptors pay a premium at their discretion).
Originally Posted by nkhalidi
Begins to smell like the opposite of capitalism.
Huh? I don't follow. I am 100% free market and think the dealerships should sell their product at whatever price the market will support. I was just wondering whether the limited production could have justified a higher MSRP. That would have reduced the 'market adjustment' and would also cut down on the "I'd never pay more than MSRP" and "find a new dealer" posts.
Originally Posted by nkhalidi
Second, CGTs were in fact trading OVER sticker when they were first released. They began to depreciate after they had been on the market for a little while. The issue there wasn't so much the car's MSRP but rather its relatively high production numbers.
Which tells me that the MSRP was too high for the volume.
Old 11-02-2007, 06:23 PM
  #37  
dasams
Rennlist Member
 
dasams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Coachella Valley
Posts: 2,216
Received 372 Likes on 261 Posts
Default Porsche and Market Adjustments

Originally Posted by NelsonF
That would not work as the profit margins on the car would just go to Porsche as opposed to the greedy stealer.
And what's wrong with that? Anyway, I can't agree since we have not discussed what price the dealer paid to Porsche. What if it's unchanged from the current? This would give the dealer the same margin as if it was sold with today's market adjustment.
Old 11-02-2007, 06:46 PM
  #38  
NelsonF
Pro
Thread Starter
 
NelsonF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fallbrook, Ca.
Posts: 507
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default new 2

"This would give the dealer the same margin as if it was sold with today's market adjustment."

Even if the Porsche charged the dealer the same price with a higher MSRP, it would not preclude the dealer from still adding another mark-up if they thought they could get it. Point is that some dealers are testing the market price points at the expense of loyal, repeat customers that made commitments (accepted by the dealers) to buy at msrp well in advance. As one of those customers that was affected, I'm expressing my displeasure and putting the dealer on notice that they've lost business going forward.
Old 11-02-2007, 07:18 PM
  #39  
dasams
Rennlist Member
 
dasams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Coachella Valley
Posts: 2,216
Received 372 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NelsonF
Even if the Porsche charged the dealer the same price with a higher MSRP, it would not preclude the dealer from still adding another mark-up if they thought they could get it.
Agreed - that's the free market at work.
Originally Posted by NelsonF
Point is that some dealers are testing the market price points at the expense of loyal, repeat customers that made commitments (accepted by the dealers) to buy at msrp well in advance. As one of those customers that was affected, I'm expressing my displeasure and putting the dealer on notice that they've lost business going forward.
I agree you are a victim to a frustrating situation and that sucks.

Speaking hypothetically, would you have bought the car if the MSPR was $50K higher and your dealer offered the car at MSRP?
Old 11-02-2007, 07:20 PM
  #40  
AmirGT2
Instructor
 
AmirGT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: LA
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NelsonF
Congrats Amir. It appears you were better positioned than I. I wonder how many cars purchased from the dealer would have elevated my status? 3 in the last 3 years was obviously not enough. Given this experience, I likely will not position myself to play their game in the future.
Thanks Nelson. Sorry to hear about the headache with your dealer. Hopefully they'll realize they are losing a quality customer and come to their senses.

Best,

Amir
Old 11-02-2007, 07:34 PM
  #41  
NelsonF
Pro
Thread Starter
 
NelsonF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fallbrook, Ca.
Posts: 507
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default new 2

"Speaking hypothetically, would you have bought the car if the MSPR was $50K higher and your dealer offered the car at MSRP?"

The answer is no as I think the car is priced at my personal value limit at it's current msrp. $250k+ would push me to consider stepping up to CGT's or more likely, stay with my current modded GT2 or something of similar overall performance within the same range. Who knows what the future will bring but I'll have one less dealer to consider.
Old 11-02-2007, 07:45 PM
  #42  
dasams
Rennlist Member
 
dasams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Coachella Valley
Posts: 2,216
Received 372 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NelsonF
stay with my current modded GT2
One last thought. Porsche could have generated a ton of good will if they had given buyers of the last gen GT2 first crack at the new one (at MSRP, natch). It would also have weeded out the flippers. And doesn't Ferrari follow such practices to great success for their new cars?
Old 11-02-2007, 08:16 PM
  #43  
NelsonF
Pro
Thread Starter
 
NelsonF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fallbrook, Ca.
Posts: 507
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default new 2

Frankly, my hope was that I would buy at msrp and that Porsche would keep production appropriately small in order to avoid the depreciation disaster of the previous GT2. You are right, they should have given previous owners the first shot at msrp. Regarding the previous GT2, they only shipped approx 300 cars last time and values still dropped (though market dynamics at the time were quite a bit different) .
Old 11-02-2007, 08:47 PM
  #44  
mastiffdog
Burning Brakes
 
mastiffdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AmirGT2
Per a very reliable source, PCNA no longer cares about dealer "mark-ups" because the cars are being flipped by the customers for the same ridiculous prices on ebay. Understandably, they would rather the dealers make the profit rather than speculators who are going to kill the market as they did with the CGT and previous GT2. According to my source, Porsche is limiting their production numbers for the 911 series and even more so for the GT cars in the U.S. This is primarily due to the foreign emerging markets as well as the declining dollar. As a matter of fact, Dubai has now surpassed Champion as their highest volume dealer.

Of course like anything else, there will be a good news and bad news scenario with this development. The good news is that this will keep the values more stable like the old days (pre-996 models) but the bad news is that it means more mark ups on harder to get cars.

I am sure that many of the more reputable dealers are going to stay loyal to their VIP customers who are not into the flipping business. My dealer, whom I have purchased many cars from, is giving me their first GT2 at MSRP.

Best,

Amir
Amir, you earned the GT2 at MSRP more than anyone at that dealership. They love you there, you are their best customer hands down.
Old 11-02-2007, 08:58 PM
  #45  
Nick
Rennlist Member
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: La Jolla
Posts: 3,635
Received 132 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Consider this.

The dealer probably made $10-12,000 per car on the previous three cars you ordered. If some doofus walks in and buys the GT2 for $100,000 over MSRP the dealer profit would around $120,000 (100,000 markup+ about 20,000 profit).

Many of us say the dealer will lose our business. The dealer could care less. With the mass production of the base 911's, the dealer has all the customer's he/she needs. The person that paid $100,000 over is the better customer to have.

I guess this is a long way of saying if you owned the dealership, you would do the same thing. Now you see why you are toast?


Quick Reply: New GT2-pass



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:27 AM.