997 GT2 Dyno pull
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
997 GT2 Dyno pull
Our local Subaru dealer had a fun car show/barbeque with a chassis dyno set up to do some dyno pulls. Just for grins I put my 997 GT2 up there to see what it would do. I was very pleasantly surprised! 617 hp @ 6,600 rpm and 581 lb-ft torque at 4,000 rpm at the wheels. Also walked away with a trophy for the strongest pull of the day.
The car has an EVOMS tune, GT2 RS intercoolers, a single mass clutch, lightweight flywheel, and a Guard diff.
The car has an EVOMS tune, GT2 RS intercoolers, a single mass clutch, lightweight flywheel, and a Guard diff.
#3
Rennlist Member
hahaha... show up with a machine gun to a knife fight....
#4
Rennlist Member
what a BLAST!!!
#5
Instructor
Thread Starter
Yeah, kinda... I was just curious to see what it would do. There were also some Vipers, Corvettes, and Mustangs there putting down down some strong numbers. Some of those modified Scubies are not to be taken too lightly either, I saw an STi do 480 whp.
#7
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Great stuff
A couple of questions:
Did they blow any air through the intercoolers ?
What sort of loading does this dyno do, how long was the power run was it a 6 second job or was it longer ?
Where did they attach the straps at the back ? last time I tried to go on a chassis dyno they attached to my lower arms and they bent them during the run !
A couple of questions:
Did they blow any air through the intercoolers ?
What sort of loading does this dyno do, how long was the power run was it a 6 second job or was it longer ?
Where did they attach the straps at the back ? last time I tried to go on a chassis dyno they attached to my lower arms and they bent them during the run !
Trending Topics
#8
Instructor
Thread Starter
Great stuff
A couple of questions:
Did they blow any air through the intercoolers ?
What sort of loading does this dyno do, how long was the power run was it a 6 second job or was it longer ?
Where did they attach the straps at the back ? last time I tried to go on a chassis dyno they attached to my lower arms and they bent them during the run !
A couple of questions:
Did they blow any air through the intercoolers ?
What sort of loading does this dyno do, how long was the power run was it a 6 second job or was it longer ?
Where did they attach the straps at the back ? last time I tried to go on a chassis dyno they attached to my lower arms and they bent them during the run !
Here's a short video:
#9
Whenever I dyno they attach the rear straps to the rear subframe cross member. The front goes through the wheels.
Congrats. Those are very nice numbers. It's interesting to compare the dyno of your VTGS to my conventional K16s. I am running ported housing with standard K16 hot sections and OEM 997GT2 compressors. This is on 91 octane and 1.2 bar. Did your tune not raise your redline as it appears to be at 6800 or did you guys just shut it down early? It would have been interesting to see how the VTGs would do above 7K. What fuel were you using?
Congrats. Those are very nice numbers. It's interesting to compare the dyno of your VTGS to my conventional K16s. I am running ported housing with standard K16 hot sections and OEM 997GT2 compressors. This is on 91 octane and 1.2 bar. Did your tune not raise your redline as it appears to be at 6800 or did you guys just shut it down early? It would have been interesting to see how the VTGs would do above 7K. What fuel were you using?
#10
Instructor
Thread Starter
Whenever I dyno they attach the rear straps to the rear subframe cross member. The front goes through the wheels.
Congrats. Those are very nice numbers. It's interesting to compare the dyno of your VTGS to my conventional K16s. I am running ported housing with standard K16 hot sections and OEM 997GT2 compressors. This is on 91 octane and 1.2 bar. Did your tune not raise your redline as it appears to be at 6800 or did you guys just shut it down early? It would have been interesting to see how the VTGs would do above 7K. What fuel were you using?
Congrats. Those are very nice numbers. It's interesting to compare the dyno of your VTGS to my conventional K16s. I am running ported housing with standard K16 hot sections and OEM 997GT2 compressors. This is on 91 octane and 1.2 bar. Did your tune not raise your redline as it appears to be at 6800 or did you guys just shut it down early? It would have been interesting to see how the VTGs would do above 7K. What fuel were you using?
The dyno guy just ran it to the redline indicated on the tach, which is 6,800. It was still making good power as can be seen in the graph. The EVOMS adds 200 rpm to the rev limiter and runs boost up to 21 psi (1.4 Bar) conditions permitting. It was running on 93 octane.
I really didn't see where they hooked the rear straps to, the guys seemed very careful and proficient though.
I was able to clear the PASM code with my Durametric software. That was the first time I've ever used that, it's pretty handy.
#11
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Hence you can't compare them to your Dynojet curves which again will differ from the OPs and the way the manufacture does it.
#12
I don't want to appear a kill joy broken record on this but the OP's dyno run was a bit of fun with a tool which can give him comparison against others on the day, basically his GT2 could spin up those rollers for 5 seconds faster than all the others the power and torque numbers are pretty meaningless if you want to compare them to a steady state braked manufacturer set of power and torque curves.
Hence you can't compare them to your Dynojet curves which again will differ from the OPs and the way the manufacture does it.
Hence you can't compare them to your Dynojet curves which again will differ from the OPs and the way the manufacture does it.
Last edited by powdrhound; 11-14-2017 at 08:42 AM.
#13
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Yes, I think everyone understands that comparing numbers on different dynos is meaningless. Nothing new there. I was simply commenting on the shape of the curves which indicate how the power comes in. Nothing more nothing less. I just realized that the OP was on a Dynocom. I initially thought he was on a Dynojet when I glanced at his graph. Obviously apples and oranges.
The factory curves have the engine braked for a period as the revs rise and are completely different hence why eg a 997 turbo has peak torque at 1900rpm according to the factory but there isn't a chassis dyno on the planet which can replicate this....
I know you know this but I was just looking at you dynojet curves and you have as much power at 4800rpm as you do at peak power ~7000rpm, this is obviously wrong and is because rollers can't measure high turbo torque it spins them up too quickly and delivers silly peaks like your 980NM !
Last time I had mine on a Chassis dyno (when it bent the arm) it chaffed the tyres as the operator tried to load it and he measured over 1000NM which is not just true.... I guess I am a bit frustracted because I'd like to do a power test to make sure all is present but apart from the fun aspect seems futile
#14
Burning Brakes
Very cool and congrats on the win numbers you pulled. Which Subaru dealer in NJ was the event at?
My Subaru Dealer also owns a Porsche dealer next door. All Flat motors together I guess was the thought :-).
My Subaru Dealer also owns a Porsche dealer next door. All Flat motors together I guess was the thought :-).
#15
It is not possible for a 5 second spin up of a known mass by a powerful TURBO engine to give a true representation of the torque curve to compare with the factory curves...
The factory curves have the engine braked for a period as the revs rise and are completely different hence why eg a 997 turbo has peak torque at 1900rpm according to the factory but there isn't a chassis dyno on the planet which can replicate this....
I know you know this but I was just looking at you dynojet curves and you have as much power at 4800rpm as you do at peak power ~7000rpm, this is obviously wrong and is because rollers can't measure high turbo torque it spins them up too quickly and delivers silly peaks like your 980NM !
Last time I had mine on a Chassis dyno (when it bent the arm) it chaffed the tyres as the operator tried to load it and he measured over 1000NM which is not just true.... I guess I am a bit frustracted because I'd like to do a power test to make sure all is present but apart from the fun aspect seems futile
The factory curves have the engine braked for a period as the revs rise and are completely different hence why eg a 997 turbo has peak torque at 1900rpm according to the factory but there isn't a chassis dyno on the planet which can replicate this....
I know you know this but I was just looking at you dynojet curves and you have as much power at 4800rpm as you do at peak power ~7000rpm, this is obviously wrong and is because rollers can't measure high turbo torque it spins them up too quickly and delivers silly peaks like your 980NM !
Last time I had mine on a Chassis dyno (when it bent the arm) it chaffed the tyres as the operator tried to load it and he measured over 1000NM which is not just true.... I guess I am a bit frustracted because I'd like to do a power test to make sure all is present but apart from the fun aspect seems futile
Last edited by powdrhound; 11-15-2017 at 03:12 AM.