Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

997 GT2 Dyno pull

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2017, 09:42 PM
  #1  
Johnb55
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Johnb55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 122
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
Default 997 GT2 Dyno pull

Our local Subaru dealer had a fun car show/barbeque with a chassis dyno set up to do some dyno pulls. Just for grins I put my 997 GT2 up there to see what it would do. I was very pleasantly surprised! 617 hp @ 6,600 rpm and 581 lb-ft torque at 4,000 rpm at the wheels. Also walked away with a trophy for the strongest pull of the day.

The car has an EVOMS tune, GT2 RS intercoolers, a single mass clutch, lightweight flywheel, and a Guard diff.
Attached Images   
Old 11-12-2017, 09:47 PM
  #2  
Igooz
Trucker
Rennlist Member
 
Igooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Permanently Banned
Posts: 4,009
Received 470 Likes on 265 Posts
Default

Wow! Impressive numbers.
Old 11-12-2017, 10:05 PM
  #3  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,482
Received 1,729 Likes on 1,057 Posts
Default

hahaha... show up with a machine gun to a knife fight....
Old 11-12-2017, 10:11 PM
  #4  
Rick GT3
Rennlist Member
 
Rick GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: PR
Posts: 883
Received 92 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

what a BLAST!!!
Old 11-13-2017, 09:21 AM
  #5  
Johnb55
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Johnb55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 122
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spyerx
hahaha... show up with a machine gun to a knife fight....
Yeah, kinda... I was just curious to see what it would do. There were also some Vipers, Corvettes, and Mustangs there putting down down some strong numbers. Some of those modified Scubies are not to be taken too lightly either, I saw an STi do 480 whp.
Old 11-13-2017, 10:24 AM
  #6  
Reid55
Racer
 
Reid55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well done!
Old 11-13-2017, 11:33 AM
  #7  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,440
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Great stuff

A couple of questions:

Did they blow any air through the intercoolers ?

What sort of loading does this dyno do, how long was the power run was it a 6 second job or was it longer ?

Where did they attach the straps at the back ? last time I tried to go on a chassis dyno they attached to my lower arms and they bent them during the run !
Old 11-13-2017, 01:07 PM
  #8  
Johnb55
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Johnb55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 122
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
Great stuff

A couple of questions:

Did they blow any air through the intercoolers ?

What sort of loading does this dyno do, how long was the power run was it a 6 second job or was it longer ?

Where did they attach the straps at the back ? last time I tried to go on a chassis dyno they attached to my lower arms and they bent them during the run !
No air blowing. They were two quick 6 second pulls. Ambient temps were about 45 degrees. They did use a Correction Factor. I assume they attached the rear straps to the lower a-arm mounting points. Fronts were through the wheels, which the car didn't like. It threw a code with the rears rolling without the fronts. I'll try to reset it with my Duramatric later today.

Here's a short video:
Old 11-13-2017, 07:01 PM
  #9  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,806
Received 1,701 Likes on 991 Posts
Default

Whenever I dyno they attach the rear straps to the rear subframe cross member. The front goes through the wheels.

Congrats. Those are very nice numbers. It's interesting to compare the dyno of your VTGS to my conventional K16s. I am running ported housing with standard K16 hot sections and OEM 997GT2 compressors. This is on 91 octane and 1.2 bar. Did your tune not raise your redline as it appears to be at 6800 or did you guys just shut it down early? It would have been interesting to see how the VTGs would do above 7K. What fuel were you using?

Old 11-13-2017, 11:29 PM
  #10  
Johnb55
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Johnb55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 122
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powdrhound
Whenever I dyno they attach the rear straps to the rear subframe cross member. The front goes through the wheels.

Congrats. Those are very nice numbers. It's interesting to compare the dyno of your VTGS to my conventional K16s. I am running ported housing with standard K16 hot sections and OEM 997GT2 compressors. This is on 91 octane and 1.2 bar. Did your tune not raise your redline as it appears to be at 6800 or did you guys just shut it down early? It would have been interesting to see how the VTGs would do above 7K. What fuel were you using?

Nice numbers there as well.
The dyno guy just ran it to the redline indicated on the tach, which is 6,800. It was still making good power as can be seen in the graph. The EVOMS adds 200 rpm to the rev limiter and runs boost up to 21 psi (1.4 Bar) conditions permitting. It was running on 93 octane.
I really didn't see where they hooked the rear straps to, the guys seemed very careful and proficient though.
I was able to clear the PASM code with my Durametric software. That was the first time I've ever used that, it's pretty handy.
Old 11-14-2017, 06:00 AM
  #11  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,440
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powdrhound
Whenever I
Congrats. Those are very nice numbers. It's interesting to compare the dyno of your VTGS to my conventional K16s.
I don't want to appear a kill joy broken record on this but the OP's dyno run was a bit of fun with a tool which can give him comparison against others on the day, basically his GT2 could spin up those rollers for 5 seconds faster than all the others the power and torque numbers are pretty meaningless if you want to compare them to a steady state braked manufacturer set of power and torque curves.

Hence you can't compare them to your Dynojet curves which again will differ from the OPs and the way the manufacture does it.
Old 11-14-2017, 08:24 AM
  #12  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,806
Received 1,701 Likes on 991 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
I don't want to appear a kill joy broken record on this but the OP's dyno run was a bit of fun with a tool which can give him comparison against others on the day, basically his GT2 could spin up those rollers for 5 seconds faster than all the others the power and torque numbers are pretty meaningless if you want to compare them to a steady state braked manufacturer set of power and torque curves.

Hence you can't compare them to your Dynojet curves which again will differ from the OPs and the way the manufacture does it.
Yes, I think everyone understands that comparing numbers on different dynos is meaningless. Nothing new there. I was simply commenting on the shape of the curves which indicate how the power comes in. Nothing more nothing less. I just realized that the OP was on a Dynocom. I initially thought he was on a Dynojet when I glanced at his graph. Obviously apples and oranges.

Last edited by powdrhound; 11-14-2017 at 08:42 AM.
Old 11-14-2017, 09:13 AM
  #13  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,440
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powdrhound
Yes, I think everyone understands that comparing numbers on different dynos is meaningless. Nothing new there. I was simply commenting on the shape of the curves which indicate how the power comes in. Nothing more nothing less. I just realized that the OP was on a Dynocom. I initially thought he was on a Dynojet when I glanced at his graph. Obviously apples and oranges.
It is not possible for a 5 second spin up of a known mass by a powerful TURBO engine to give a true representation of the torque curve to compare with the factory curves...
The factory curves have the engine braked for a period as the revs rise and are completely different hence why eg a 997 turbo has peak torque at 1900rpm according to the factory but there isn't a chassis dyno on the planet which can replicate this....

I know you know this but I was just looking at you dynojet curves and you have as much power at 4800rpm as you do at peak power ~7000rpm, this is obviously wrong and is because rollers can't measure high turbo torque it spins them up too quickly and delivers silly peaks like your 980NM !

Last time I had mine on a Chassis dyno (when it bent the arm) it chaffed the tyres as the operator tried to load it and he measured over 1000NM which is not just true.... I guess I am a bit frustracted because I'd like to do a power test to make sure all is present but apart from the fun aspect seems futile
Old 11-14-2017, 05:20 PM
  #14  
Giantviper
Burning Brakes
 
Giantviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 1,137
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Very cool and congrats on the win numbers you pulled. Which Subaru dealer in NJ was the event at?

My Subaru Dealer also owns a Porsche dealer next door. All Flat motors together I guess was the thought :-).
Old 11-14-2017, 05:47 PM
  #15  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,806
Received 1,701 Likes on 991 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
It is not possible for a 5 second spin up of a known mass by a powerful TURBO engine to give a true representation of the torque curve to compare with the factory curves...
The factory curves have the engine braked for a period as the revs rise and are completely different hence why eg a 997 turbo has peak torque at 1900rpm according to the factory but there isn't a chassis dyno on the planet which can replicate this....

I know you know this but I was just looking at you dynojet curves and you have as much power at 4800rpm as you do at peak power ~7000rpm, this is obviously wrong and is because rollers can't measure high turbo torque it spins them up too quickly and delivers silly peaks like your 980NM !

Last time I had mine on a Chassis dyno (when it bent the arm) it chaffed the tyres as the operator tried to load it and he measured over 1000NM which is not just true.... I guess I am a bit frustracted because I'd like to do a power test to make sure all is present but apart from the fun aspect seems futile
Nowhere was I comparing anything to factory curves. Not sure where you are reading that. Honestly, who really cares about factory curves? I certainly don't since a factory dyno is virtually inaccessible to the average Joe. After all, outside of what is posted by the manufacturer, 99% of dynos graphs that you see out there are obviously NOT on factory dynos but rather by guys using run of the mill dynojets, mustangs, or other chassis dynos like the one used by the OP. All of these dynos as you correctly mentioned naturally have their limitations especially when it comes accurately depicting torque peaks on turbocharged power plants resulting in an overinflation of the peak numbers. All of these dynos however are useful to VALIDATE CHANGES you make to the power plant when tested on the SAME dyno and ideally under the SAME atmospheric conditions. Nothing more. I'm good with that as it serves it's purpose and as such don't lose much sleep over not being able to test on a factory dyno. Would it be great to get some numbers on the same rig as used by the manufacturer? Sure, but it ain’t gonna happen so life goes on. Honestly, most people are simply trying to find out if the tune or the new XYZ gizmo they put on the engine results in a quantifiable gain, or in the OPs case, how it compares to other cars on the same rollers. For most people that’s good enough..

Last edited by powdrhound; 11-15-2017 at 03:12 AM.


Quick Reply: 997 GT2 Dyno pull



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:33 AM.