Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

997GT3 front shock upper mount question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2017, 02:13 PM
  #16  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,822
Received 1,719 Likes on 1,001 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pete95zhn
I have 997 GT3's upper shock mounts on my 996. The bolt pattern is the same. They will space shock tops about 10 mm outboard / side. (IIRC, maybe it was 15mm. Can't measure just now, the car is 200 kms away)
Pete, I think the reason you are seeing this discrepancy of 15mm is that you are comparing the plates with one in the high camber and the other in low camber configuration. When doing so, the difference is 14mm.
Old 10-27-2017, 02:45 PM
  #17  
T10Chris
Three Wheelin'
 
T10Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,405
Received 161 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Great info in this thread. Thanks everyone for contributing.
Old 10-27-2017, 03:17 PM
  #18  
Tom@TPC Racing
Rennlist Member
 
Tom@TPC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jessup, MD
Posts: 3,367
Received 913 Likes on 513 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powdrhound
Whoever opened up the shock tower in the pics you have above where they cut away a large portion of the upper "dome" simply went way overboard, no reason to go that drastic.
The photo is of a 996Cup bare tub sitting outside for 12 years. It was one of four Cup cars that we raced in GrandAm Rolex back in 2005. This was the test car for different setups. The opening was made so big to allow for 5-minute front spring change on pit lane during practice session. At that time JRZ didn't even offer the red **** so up with the airjack, off the front wheels, pop the top nut with an impact, let the shock drop and swap the spring of same height with no change to front camber and toe. On to green track the car goes for the driver to give feedback. We did have a good reason. This reason I am sure sounds ridiculous for most car owners however it did serve that very specific purpose for the team. You're right, for 99.9% of car owners, don't do it.
Old 10-27-2017, 03:34 PM
  #19  
pete95zhn
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
pete95zhn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: fortistuning.fi
Posts: 2,271
Received 99 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powdrhound
Pete, I think the reason you are seeing this discrepancy of 15mm is that you are comparing the plates with one in the high camber and the other in low camber configuration. When doing so, the difference is 14mm.
I'm pretty sure had I compared both in low camber position, because that's what I use, but can't right now confirm that...as big A says: I'll be back...
__________________
Pete

Power. Lots is good, more is better, too much is just right...

'87 951, RIP
'00 996 C2 L92U AQ / IXAA IXRB IX54 M96/7.xx G96/7.88 M030 M375 M376 M436 M476 M601 M983 ... + 991 GT3 brakes, 997 GT3 sway bars, fully monoball'd suspension, Bilstein Cup Car coilovers, do88 Big Pack ICs. 10 & 12 x 19" BBS CH-R wheels with 265/30 & 325 /30 -19 MPSC2s.



Old 10-27-2017, 03:54 PM
  #20  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,822
Received 1,719 Likes on 1,001 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom-TPC Racing
The photo is of a 996Cup bare tub sitting outside for 12 years. It was one of four Cup cars that we raced in GrandAm Rolex back in 2005. This was the test car for different setups. The opening was made so big to allow for 5-minute front spring change on pit lane during practice session. At that time JRZ didn't even offer the red **** so up with the airjack, off the front wheels, pop the top nut with an impact, let the shock drop and swap the spring of same height with no change to front camber and toe. On to green track the car goes for the driver to give feedback. We did have a good reason. This reason I am sure sounds ridiculous for most car owners however it did serve that very specific purpose for the team. You're right, for 99.9% of car owners, don't do it.
Makes sense Tom. Thanks!
Old 10-28-2017, 12:34 AM
  #21  
lordpantsington
Pro
 
lordpantsington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 533
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Been looking for these measurements for a while, Thanks a bunch.
Old 11-01-2017, 11:07 PM
  #22  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,822
Received 1,719 Likes on 1,001 Posts
Default

Okay. Here is the deal boys and girls. I got my grubby hands on both the OEM 996 and 997 versions of the Cup/GT2/GT3 upper mounts today. While the 996 mount has the asymmetrical shape and the 997 mount has the symmetrical hexagon shape, they are both 100% interchangeable. The stud/bolt pattern is identical at 118/110/110 and the monoball is also centered identically within the triangular bolt pattern for both mounts when comparing them in the low and high camber configurations. As such, as I mentioned in my post #15 above, the monoball boss for both the 996 and 997 mounts will just barely come in contact with the strut tower when in the high camber config and slid all the way inboard in the slots. You can see that the 997 OEM mount is also a dead ringer for the 996 JRZ mount as pictured below.

With that said, I have no idea why Porsche made the oddball shape for the 996 mount but I suspect that maybe the original 996.1 tub may have had different strut towers which required the cut outs in the mounts and that carried on until Porsche introduced the 997 versions. Just a guess though. There is certainly no clearance issue whatsoever of the 997 mounts when used in 996.2 and later cars. Hope all this puts the misinformation to rest once and for good.

Cheers...

The following users liked this post:
brontosaurus (09-17-2021)
Old 11-02-2017, 11:03 PM
  #23  
oldskews4
Rennlist Member
 
oldskews4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I told you so over at 6GT3 forum when you first posted. I guess I'm not trust worthy
Old 11-02-2017, 11:28 PM
  #24  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,822
Received 1,719 Likes on 1,001 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oldskews4
I told you so over at 6GT3 forum when you first posted. I guess I'm not trust worthy
Sorry. I didn't notice your post till a few days later and without any proof besides a simple sentence saying they work, it's hard to believe that 100%. Again, way too many people saying the will fit and they won't fit for one reason or another. Again, what threw me off is Tom's previous posts regarding this in other threads. When guys that run race shops are posting stuff claiming up and down they won't fit, it's hard to discount them because you would typically assume they know what they're talking about. Unfortunately that was not the case here as pretty much every thing posted in this thread has been proven wrong. Not saying this to be deragatory, but one thing I've learned over the years is that in most cases for the most part the only person you can trust is yourself and have to verify everything yourself to be 100% sure.

Last edited by powdrhound; 11-03-2017 at 01:52 PM.
Old 11-10-2022, 01:22 PM
  #25  
norwegen911
Instructor
 
norwegen911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

What is the best solution for changing top mounts on 997 gt3? Original porsche or other brands?



Quick Reply: 997GT3 front shock upper mount question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:17 AM.