Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Gundo hack 1.75" vs 2" pipes. What's the difference in sound and volume?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2016, 10:25 AM
  #1  
ElectricChair
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ElectricChair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,741
Received 200 Likes on 93 Posts
Default Gundo hack 1.75" vs 2" pipes. What's the difference in sound and volume?

997.2 C2 PDK (non-PSE)

I already order the fabspeed x-pipes to pair with gundo hack.

Questions:

1) Should I do gundo with 1.75" or 2" pipes?

2) What's the difference in sound and volume?

Thanks in advance!
Old 10-18-2016, 10:54 AM
  #2  
WantA997
Rennlist Member
 
WantA997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,205
Received 171 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Just curious why you went with Fabspeed over Sharkwerks (or even Billy Boat)?
Old 10-18-2016, 11:51 AM
  #3  
ElectricChair
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ElectricChair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,741
Received 200 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

A few posts/threads that helped with my decision:
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...l#post10397993
https://rennlist.com/forums/parts-ma...l#post11475042
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...l#post13073675
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/9...er-bypass.html

Also a few rennlisters reported drone and vibrations with sharkwerks on 997.2 PDK cars (note = PDK cars only). Asking around before taking my decision, I got this PM from a fellow rennlist member:
"Just an FYI, I had a Shark works Cross pipe shipped and I installed it to my PDK car. I had to remove the cross pipe due to vibration at idle. ( I think it dropped my revs a little causing the vibration ) bad enough that the inside of the car, seats including were shaking."

Sharkwerks added a note to their product page:
http://www.sharkwerks.com/products.php?pid=193
Note: A small percentage of owners have reported that there is a slight vibration at idle speed in Drive (PDK models only), when the brake pedal is depressed at a stop. This has been reported with all aftermarket exhaust systems. This can be fixed with a software tuning upgrade. It is considered normal and will not harm the vehicle.

My understanding is that droning and vibrations can occur with any exhaust mod. But since I am doing a DIY project, I chose the "less risky" road.
Old 10-18-2016, 01:01 PM
  #4  
kruzn911
Rennlist Member
 
kruzn911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

very interested in the same setup as you. Looking forward to hearing some sound clips!
Old 10-18-2016, 02:00 PM
  #5  
Crester
Pro
 
Crester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 585
Received 67 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

I have the set up you are going for... Fabspeed and Gundo. I went with 2" and I think you should as well. The car isn't that much louder when driving normally. It's only when you are heavy on the throttle that the car gets loud.

I also choose Fabspeed over Sharkwerks because of the vibration issue on PDK cars. I don't have any vibrations when stopped... but the Fabspeed makes your engine sound more high pitched. It's upto you if that's a good or bad thing.
Old 10-18-2016, 05:45 PM
  #6  
Iceter
Drifting
 
Iceter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 2,612
Received 412 Likes on 243 Posts
Default

I'll chime in here and say first that this is only my opinion and I have NOT heard two cars side by side with a 1.75" versus 2" Gundo hack.

That being said, IMO, there will be zero difference between the two.

I say this because:
1. The hack is a straight pipe that acts as more of a pressure equalizer than an exhaust diverter.
2. The difference in the volume of any flow down the pipe is minimal between 1.75" and 2".
3. The hack is buried several feet upstream of the exhaust outlet, minimizing any effect that a very slight change in pipe diameter at the hack would cause.

If anyone has audio of the two pipe diameters to compare, I'd love to hear it, but I think this is something that doesn't really matter very much.

The only question I've ever had about making the hack more effective is this... . I'd love to weld in a curved pipe in place of the straight hack, so that much more exhaust flow is diverted through the hack and away from the muffler. I've always thought that the exhaust probably had enough velocity that most of the flow just bypassed the hack tube and shot straight into the muffler. I've wondered if a contoured hack pipe would not only change the sound but actually improve performance--even if just a little.
Old 10-18-2016, 07:23 PM
  #7  
jhbrennan
Rennlist Member
 
jhbrennan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 6,571
Received 81 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iceter
I'll chime in here and say first that this is only my opinion and I have NOT heard two cars side by side with a 1.75" versus 2" Gundo hack.

That being said, IMO, there will be zero difference between the two.

I say this because:
1. The hack is a straight pipe that acts as more of a pressure equalizer than an exhaust diverter.
2. The difference in the volume of any flow down the pipe is minimal between 1.75" and 2".
3. The hack is buried several feet upstream of the exhaust outlet, minimizing any effect that a very slight change in pipe diameter at the hack would cause.

If anyone has audio of the two pipe diameters to compare, I'd love to hear it, but I think this is something that doesn't really matter very much.

The only question I've ever had about making the hack more effective is this... . I'd love to weld in a curved pipe in place of the straight hack, so that much more exhaust flow is diverted through the hack and away from the muffler. I've always thought that the exhaust probably had enough velocity that most of the flow just bypassed the hack tube and shot straight into the muffler. I've wondered if a contoured hack pipe would not only change the sound but actually improve performance--even if just a little.
Do we know what diameter Fister uses?
Old 10-18-2016, 07:30 PM
  #8  
docdrs
Rennlist Member
 
docdrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada 2011 C4S
Posts: 1,156
Received 72 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Its quite simple..... its 2-1.75 / 2 or 12.5% quieter with the 1.75 diameter pipe over the 2" pipe. Do the 2" and if its too loud pinch the pipe to reduce the blow by volume.
Old 10-18-2016, 09:25 PM
  #9  
ElectricChair
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ElectricChair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,741
Received 200 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jhbrennan
Do we know what diameter Fister uses?
Fister uses 1.75".
Old 10-19-2016, 10:26 AM
  #10  
ElectricChair
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ElectricChair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,741
Received 200 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iceter
The only question I've ever had about making the hack more effective is this... . I'd love to weld in a curved pipe in place of the straight hack, so that much more exhaust flow is diverted through the hack and away from the muffler. I've always thought that the exhaust probably had enough velocity that most of the flow just bypassed the hack tube and shot straight into the muffler. I've wondered if a contoured hack pipe would not only change the sound but actually improve performance--even if just a little.
Interesting idea. That would be very loud IMO, but too much flow may result in loss of power.
Old 10-19-2016, 02:45 PM
  #11  
CTCOOP
Intermediate
 
CTCOOP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just did the Fister mufflers (1.75'') with fabspeed x pipe (6 speed Cab). It sounds GREAT (IMO) but I can't imagine wanting it even a little bit louder than it is currently. Although, I don't know that the 12% difference in diameter can truly be equated to a 12% increase in sound - I would think less of an increase. Going to need an engineer to weigh in on that one...

Anyways, sound is always personal preference, but my new setup is LOUD with the top down over 3K RPM. As in people turn to look across 3 lanes of traffic in town wondering what that sound is
Old 10-19-2016, 04:20 PM
  #12  
Iceter
Drifting
 
Iceter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 2,612
Received 412 Likes on 243 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docdrs
Its quite simple..... its 2-1.75 / 2 or 12.5% quieter with the 1.75 diameter pipe over the 2" pipe. Do the 2" and if its too loud pinch the pipe to reduce the blow by volume.
The math isn't that simple. The area of a circle is Pi x r, so a 2" pipe has 42% more volume than a 1.75" pipe. Or, a 1.75" pipe has 36% less volume than a 2" pipe, if you're a glass half empty kind of guy. Either way, because the hack is a pressure equalizer and not a flow improver, I don't see how it would affect the sound level very much. I can see that it might affect the tone--although to the good or the bad, I don't know.

Originally Posted by ElectricChair
Interesting idea. That would be very loud IMO, but too much flow may result in loss of power.
I don't see how improving exhaust flow would decrease power. Bypassing the mufflers could only improve power. However, I agree that it could get very loud, depending on how much flow it diverted around the muffler.
Old 10-19-2016, 05:02 PM
  #13  
Ducati_John
Advanced
 
Ducati_John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: -
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The muffler is an acoustic low pass filter - it attenuates high frequencies coming out the engine via the exhaust pipe. When you do the gundo hack, you are partially short circuiting the acoustic lowpass of the muffler. This means more high frequencies get through. When I did my 2" hack, I got about 20dB more output between 150Hz and 600Hz. This changes the tonal characteristic of the exhaust sound. In my case, I heard a lot more crackles on deceleration and in general it sounds raspier. A smaller pipe would be less of a bypass and would tune things a bit differently. Without making a more detailed model, I couldn't say exactly what it would do, but generally I'd expect less increase of high frequencies compared to the 2" pipe. I took some measurements of my 2" hack with Sharkwerks bypass and posted them here:
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...l#post13403188
Old 10-19-2016, 05:32 PM
  #14  
Blu311
Burning Brakes
 
Blu311's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,174
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

I did a 1.5'' and while it sounded a lot better than stock, I wish it was a bit louder (and I don't really like loud exhausts). So if I could have do-over, I would go with 2''.
Old 10-19-2016, 06:06 PM
  #15  
Dan@SharkWerks
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Dan@SharkWerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 507
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I also choose Fabspeed over Sharkwerks because of the vibration issue on PDK cars. I don't have any vibrations when stopped... but the Fabspeed makes your engine sound more high pitched. It's upto you if that's a good or bad thing.
Originally Posted by ElectricChair
A few posts/threads that helped with my decision:
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...l#post10397993
https://rennlist.com/forums/parts-ma...l#post11475042
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...l#post13073675
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/9...er-bypass.html

Also a few rennlisters reported drone and vibrations with sharkwerks on 997.2 PDK cars (note = PDK cars only). Asking around before taking my decision, I got this PM from a fellow rennlist member:
"Just an FYI, I had a Shark works Cross pipe shipped and I installed it to my PDK car. I had to remove the cross pipe due to vibration at idle. ( I think it dropped my revs a little causing the vibration ) bad enough that the inside of the car, seats including were shaking."

Sharkwerks added a note to their product page:
http://www.sharkwerks.com/products.php?pid=193
Note: A small percentage of owners have reported that there is a slight vibration at idle speed in Drive (PDK models only), when the brake pedal is depressed at a stop. This has been reported with all aftermarket exhaust systems. This can be fixed with a software tuning upgrade. It is considered normal and will not harm the vehicle.

My understanding is that droning and vibrations can occur with any exhaust mod. But since I am doing a DIY project, I chose the "less risky" road.
I had a call about this earlier and wanted to address this topic. We also just installed one today (2009 PDK with no side muffler mods) and there are no vibrations on the car at idle or in Drive at a stop.

I don't know if it's due to what we changed with the design over the years (we now have added clearance for PSE side mufflers and completely changed the bracket system that attaches the muffler to the car), but I have not seen a 997.2 vibrate with our center exhaust for at least 4 years now. I believe that issue is 100% fixed. This was very early on with our first designs which may have not fit as nicely onto the header flange as well.

It was very rare anyway - I heard maybe 3-4 complaints over the years on these from customers and the parts were not installed here so I could not check clearances vs side mufflers, torque etc. to confirm, but we also never heard of this happening on cars with PSE or Gundo / FD hack.
__________________
Dan Kennedy
SharkWerks: www.sharkwerks.com
Northern California's Porsche Performance, & authorized Evolution Motorsports, TechArt, HRE and Tubi, Cargraphic dealer and installation center
Phone: 510-651-0300
Email: dan@sharkwerks.com

SharkWerks' Latest Updates on Twitter


Quick Reply: Gundo hack 1.75" vs 2" pipes. What's the difference in sound and volume?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:47 PM.