Auto-blip "manuals"
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Auto-blip "manuals"
Came to mind reading another thread. I'm guessing this already has another thread but my search skills on here are lousy.
I was watching a track session of someone in a GT4. It was impressive to see them handle the Nurburgring as well as they did, and great to see the GT4 (moreso the driver) keeping pace with an Aventador SV and doing well vs. a Ring Taxi M3.
I was initially particularly impressed by the quickness and accuracy in their shifting / rev matching. I then realized (either reading through comments or observation) that they were using the autoblip feature.
Now, of course this makes sense to maximize times, particularly on a challenging course. However, I don't quite "get" this middle ground. I would prefer at that point to just have a PDK system and keep my hands on the wheel. The "challenge" or joy of manual is in large part (to me) the rev matching or rev matching under braking and heel-toe skill required to do so smoothly.
Has anyone used this auto blip system on a "manual" car? Does it feel as odd as it looks? Or do you just get accustomed to it? I would almost fear moving to that system and then back to a regular manual car, and start engine braking on every downshift....
Again, not a critique on the driver using it for such a track but I just don't quite get the appeal or point.
Thoughts?
I was watching a track session of someone in a GT4. It was impressive to see them handle the Nurburgring as well as they did, and great to see the GT4 (moreso the driver) keeping pace with an Aventador SV and doing well vs. a Ring Taxi M3.
I was initially particularly impressed by the quickness and accuracy in their shifting / rev matching. I then realized (either reading through comments or observation) that they were using the autoblip feature.
Now, of course this makes sense to maximize times, particularly on a challenging course. However, I don't quite "get" this middle ground. I would prefer at that point to just have a PDK system and keep my hands on the wheel. The "challenge" or joy of manual is in large part (to me) the rev matching or rev matching under braking and heel-toe skill required to do so smoothly.
Has anyone used this auto blip system on a "manual" car? Does it feel as odd as it looks? Or do you just get accustomed to it? I would almost fear moving to that system and then back to a regular manual car, and start engine braking on every downshift....
Again, not a critique on the driver using it for such a track but I just don't quite get the appeal or point.
Thoughts?
#2
I agree it's lame on a manual. None of the manual 997s have this feature. It was introduced on the 991, I think mid-year on the 2013s.
#4
Rennlist Member
Came to mind reading another thread. I'm guessing this already has another thread but my search skills on here are lousy.
I was watching a track session of someone in a GT4. It was impressive to see them handle the Nurburgring as well as they did, and great to see the GT4 (moreso the driver) keeping pace with an Aventador SV and doing well vs. a Ring Taxi M3.
I was initially particularly impressed by the quickness and accuracy in their shifting / rev matching. I then realized (either reading through comments or observation) that they were using the autoblip feature.
Now, of course this makes sense to maximize times, particularly on a challenging course. However, I don't quite "get" this middle ground. I would prefer at that point to just have a PDK system and keep my hands on the wheel. The "challenge" or joy of manual is in large part (to me) the rev matching or rev matching under braking and heel-toe skill required to do so smoothly.
Has anyone used this auto blip system on a "manual" car? Does it feel as odd as it looks? Or do you just get accustomed to it? I would almost fear moving to that system and then back to a regular manual car, and start engine braking on every downshift....
Again, not a critique on the driver using it for such a track but I just don't quite get the appeal or point.
Thoughts?
I was watching a track session of someone in a GT4. It was impressive to see them handle the Nurburgring as well as they did, and great to see the GT4 (moreso the driver) keeping pace with an Aventador SV and doing well vs. a Ring Taxi M3.
I was initially particularly impressed by the quickness and accuracy in their shifting / rev matching. I then realized (either reading through comments or observation) that they were using the autoblip feature.
Now, of course this makes sense to maximize times, particularly on a challenging course. However, I don't quite "get" this middle ground. I would prefer at that point to just have a PDK system and keep my hands on the wheel. The "challenge" or joy of manual is in large part (to me) the rev matching or rev matching under braking and heel-toe skill required to do so smoothly.
Has anyone used this auto blip system on a "manual" car? Does it feel as odd as it looks? Or do you just get accustomed to it? I would almost fear moving to that system and then back to a regular manual car, and start engine braking on every downshift....
Again, not a critique on the driver using it for such a track but I just don't quite get the appeal or point.
Thoughts?
Point is, it can be defeated. No one forces you to use it, but it's there if you want it. Fun too if you time a few laps with auto blip engaged, and then try to replicate the times without it. Tells you how good a driver you are!!
Yes, just click Sport button to off on GT4. On 991 GTS/50th leave it in Sport, stay out of Sport Plus.
#5
Nordschleife Master
Not lame. The first gearboxes had straight teeth and no synchros. They always required double clutching. That was possible because things were much slower than they are now. Then synchros were invented, no double clutching needed. Now the technology to match the engine shaft to the gearbox shaft is available and it just makes sense. Precise, no wear. H&T is a guess at best. If someone needs to show others their superiority by doing that, they've got issues.
This from someone who still double clutches a 915 tranny, if you know what that is... and only because those are 30-yo parts.
This from someone who still double clutches a 915 tranny, if you know what that is... and only because those are 30-yo parts.
#6
Rennlist Member
I have a 2006 997S manual and have driven a stick for many years but my heel-toe skills are lacking. I went to the Porsche sport driving course in Birmingham and had this feature on a 991S and on the Cayman GT4. I Loved it. Made me even consider moving to a 991 just to get it. You can use it or turn it off depending on the sport or sport plus setting. Great feature. Maybe it artificially makes you a better driver, but I will take it. I don't consider it a middle ground vs. PDK. If performance is the only factor then PDK is the way to go, but I enjoy a manual and this adds to the manual experience if you aren't a world class heel-toe shifter.
#7
Rennlist Member
I think that you have to turn off stability control in the GT4 to get rid of the rev-matching feature. This is probably one of the only things I don't like about that car.
If its a manual, lets keep is that way. As the default, do no rev-match and if you want to add it, press a button. I really enjoy doing it myself and I think it would make me lazy and out of practice if I didn't have to do it.
If its a manual, lets keep is that way. As the default, do no rev-match and if you want to add it, press a button. I really enjoy doing it myself and I think it would make me lazy and out of practice if I didn't have to do it.
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
I think that you have to turn off stability control in the GT4 to get rid of the rev-matching feature. This is probably one of the only things I don't like about that car.
If its a manual, lets keep is that way. As the default, do no rev-match and if you want to add it, press a button. I really enjoy doing it myself and I think it would make me lazy and out of practice if I didn't have to do it.
If its a manual, lets keep is that way. As the default, do no rev-match and if you want to add it, press a button. I really enjoy doing it myself and I think it would make me lazy and out of practice if I didn't have to do it.
#10
Rennlist Member
#11
Burning Brakes
Not lame. The first gearboxes had straight teeth and no synchros. They always required double clutching. That was possible because things were much slower than they are now. This from someone who still double clutches a 915 tranny, if you know what that is... and only because those are 30-yo parts.
Concluding your history lesson for the day……….
#12
Oops, this was referring to the M2 not the gt4. Brain fart!!! Glad that Porsche got this right, but would still rather have it turned off as the default mode.
Quite frankly I don't understand how auto-blip has never been widely implemented; we've had electronic throttle for a long time. It's like the synchros as people pointed out, a new generation of stick-shift drivers (sadly, that remains uncertain) will wonder why older cars lack it.
#13
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Lots of different views.
I enjoy rev matching on back roads. I think it is fundamentally a part of manual transmission. That said, I love that the GT4 at least has a manual and the ability to turn off this auto blip feature saves that.
For a track, if two hands on wheel is the key, the auto blip still seems an odd in-between mode (to me).
I do think that rev matching and H&T are big parts of a fun country road drive (again, to me). If I was trying to set best lap times I would want paddles on the wheel.
I enjoy rev matching on back roads. I think it is fundamentally a part of manual transmission. That said, I love that the GT4 at least has a manual and the ability to turn off this auto blip feature saves that.
For a track, if two hands on wheel is the key, the auto blip still seems an odd in-between mode (to me).
I do think that rev matching and H&T are big parts of a fun country road drive (again, to me). If I was trying to set best lap times I would want paddles on the wheel.
#14
Rennlist Member
I think the feature is good as an option to push a turn on, but not in default mode. It's just my opinion tho
#15
Rennlist Member
On my wife's audi I remember paying extra for the paddles and it was a must for me to have (if we were going to have an auto Trans it had to be a DsG and had to have paddles) they are rarely used after all.