Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

997.1 vs 997.2 and the "big difference"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2016, 01:17 PM
  #31  
golfnutintib
Rennlist Member
 
golfnutintib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: ..............
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rickdogg82
I wonder how good the suspension refinements could be if they are not even listed (in the PDF document) as an improvement among the list of "New for 2009" features.

New for 2009
Though the 2009 911 Carrera and Carrera S Coupes boast several important
refinements over the 2008 cars, the cars carry the same internal 997 designation as
their immediate predecessors. Chief among those refinements are new, more
powerful and fuel-efficient engines and the availability of Porsche's seven-speed
double-clutch transmission, the PDK, in place of the optional Tiptronic S.
Other critical changes include larger, more potent brakes, a revised Porsche
Communication Management system with Bluetooth connectivity and available voice
commands, a fresh exterior with BI-XENON™ headlights, and light-emitting-diode rear
lighting.
suspension evolution is significant, and immediately noticeable, whether tooling around town or near the limit

.2 car front end does not 'pogo' over bumps nearly as much and the whole feel of the car is much 'quieter' while delivering better grip in quick weight transitions
Old 04-01-2016, 01:56 PM
  #32  
Ericson38
Burning Brakes
 
Ericson38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Central California Coast
Posts: 1,011
Received 328 Likes on 254 Posts
Default

Have you looked at the 997.1 and .2 suspension on a rack, next to each other? The geometry differences are not discernable with the eye. There may be shock and spring rate differences, and fluid filled mounts and such, but there are no real changes in suspension geometry. My C4 cab does not pogo, feels planted, and yes I have driven a 997.2 C2S also.

Last edited by Ericson38; 04-01-2016 at 02:17 PM.
Old 04-01-2016, 02:02 PM
  #33  
Ericson38
Burning Brakes
 
Ericson38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Central California Coast
Posts: 1,011
Received 328 Likes on 254 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by snake eyes
Bruce,
they revised the entire suspension layout on the 997.2 cars.. I watched a video somewhere where they had them both on a lift and a Porsche engineer was explaining how they upgraded the control arms hubs and shock mounts.
I think it was a product overview class for Porsche dealerships service center.

In a nut shell the 997.2 has a complete powertrain and suspension package revision from the 997.1. It also has an interior and PCM upgrade.
Very big differences just on the engineering side not on the cosmetic side..

I like to think of it as part 997.1 and part 991.1
Upgraded hubs and shock mounts aren't entire revised suspension layout changes.
Old 04-01-2016, 02:03 PM
  #34  
Austin997.2
Burning Brakes
 
Austin997.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 992
Received 51 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

My 997.2 goes to 11, not sure about the 997.1.
Old 04-01-2016, 02:07 PM
  #35  
vern1
Drifting
 
vern1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,351
Received 104 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

Why would anyone want to buy a 997.2 vs .1 when all you get is an updated NAV.....

I can barely tell the difference cosmetically and I know what the differences are. I bet if you gave an uninformed person 10 mins to look at the 2 side by side that they probably couldn't tell

Sure a few extra horses would be nice but it was hardly a ground breaking move

Besides, the 997.1 sounds sooooo much better!!
Old 04-01-2016, 02:18 PM
  #36  
snake eyes
Three Wheelin'
 
snake eyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,649
Received 358 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ericson38
Have you looked at the 997.1 and .2 suspension on a rack, next to each other? The geometry differences are not discernable with the eye. There may be shock and spring rate differences, and fluid filled mounts and such, but there are no real changes in suspension geometry. My C4 does not pogo, feels planted, and yes I have driven a 997.2 C2 also.
your Carrera 4 has completely different suspension tuning and many different parts than the 997.2 4 version.
don't kid yourself as they have completely different AWD systems.
Old 04-01-2016, 02:21 PM
  #37  
snake eyes
Three Wheelin'
 
snake eyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,649
Received 358 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vern1
Why would anyone want to buy a 997.2 vs .1 when all you get is an updated NAV.....

I can barely tell the difference cosmetically and I know what the differences are. I bet if you gave an uninformed person 10 mins to look at the 2 side by side that they probably couldn't tell

Sure a few extra horses would be nice but it was hardly a ground breaking move

Besides, the 997.1 sounds sooooo much better!!
yup cosmetically they are the same just about..

I wonder if the 991.1 guys are going to have this debate with the 991.2 guys
And than say how their outdated 9A1 engine sounds better, how the rear steering doesn't matter, how the electronic rear diff isn't a big difference, or they don't care for the new LED rear lights

But hey park them side by side no one can tell difference between a 991.1 and a 991.2!
Old 04-01-2016, 02:24 PM
  #38  
Ericson38
Burning Brakes
 
Ericson38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Central California Coast
Posts: 1,011
Received 328 Likes on 254 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by snake eyes
your Carrera 4 has completely different suspension tuning and many different parts than the 997.2 4 version.
don't kid yourself as they have completely different AWD systems.
That is not suspension, that's the AWD clutch.
Old 04-01-2016, 02:28 PM
  #39  
snake eyes
Three Wheelin'
 
snake eyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,649
Received 358 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ericson38
That is not suspension, that's the AWD clutch.
The AWD system weighs more. They have new shocks, SPASM available which I have, springs, mounts, control arms, hubs, half shafts, and brakes...

BUT WAIT THAT IS NOT DIFFERN'T SERIOUSLY

Oh and I suppose you think your car is the same as a 997.1 GT3 too
Old 04-01-2016, 02:32 PM
  #40  
Ericson38
Burning Brakes
 
Ericson38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Central California Coast
Posts: 1,011
Received 328 Likes on 254 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by snake eyes
The AWD system weighs more. They have new shocks, SPASM available which I have, springs, mounts, control arms, hubs, half shafts, and brakes...

BUT WAIT THAT IS NOT DIFFERN'T SERIOUSLY

Oh and I suppose you think your car is the same as a 997.1 GT3 too
Mounts, rates, etc, yes, but not an entirely different suspension layout at all. Now we are in to the weight of the AWD ? If you say so.
Old 04-01-2016, 02:35 PM
  #41  
snake eyes
Three Wheelin'
 
snake eyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,649
Received 358 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ericson38
Mounts, rates, etc, yes, but not an entirely different suspension layout at all. Now we are in to the weight of the AWD ? If you say so.
sigh, by your logic you own a GT3 congratulations!
because a GT3 or Turbo doesn't have entirely different suspension layout.
You know being the platform is the same..

so there you go enjoy
Old 04-01-2016, 02:40 PM
  #42  
Ericson38
Burning Brakes
 
Ericson38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Central California Coast
Posts: 1,011
Received 328 Likes on 254 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by snake eyes
sigh, by your logic you own a GT3 congratulations!
because a GT3 or Turbo doesn't have entirely different suspension layout.
You know being the platform is the same..

so there you go enjoy
997.2 is the title of the thread.

Last edited by Ericson38; 04-01-2016 at 02:59 PM.
Old 04-01-2016, 03:24 PM
  #43  
speedracerf4i
Pro
 
speedracerf4i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Chino Hills
Posts: 537
Received 171 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Here are the reasons of why I shelled out extra $10K for my 997.2 C4S vs 997.1 C4S last year (not in order of preference):

1. Easier oil change on .2, you don't have to lift the car to change the oil filter.
2. Bigger brake than .1 on non-S cars. And all .2 calipers has been strengthened.
3. Revised suspension. The .2 seems to dampen the higher frequency bumps better than .1
3. C4S and all 4's now comes with mechanical LSD. This is a big ticket item.
4. Electronic F/R differential that reacts faster to driving conditions (so they said).
5. Ventilated seats are finally available. Very important here in CA.
6. New PCM including the available Bluetooth, larger screen, available iPod integration AND Sat Radio.
7. No more IMS (I think this was the biggest reason).
8. DFI (better mileage).
9. Better looking standard wheels (IMHO)
10. LED lighting all around + the available adaptive cornering lights (I love it in my BMW).
11. I liked the black keys (.2) better than the silver keys (.1)
12. I love the silver painted front air inlets on .2 4S's
13. I almost forgot the 30 extra HP. It's nice to have some extra power.
14. Bigger side mirrors. What can I say, I am old and bigger mirror helps.

Last edited by speedracerf4i; 04-01-2016 at 06:46 PM. Reason: missing info added
Old 04-01-2016, 03:37 PM
  #44  
Ericson38
Burning Brakes
 
Ericson38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Central California Coast
Posts: 1,011
Received 328 Likes on 254 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerf4i
Here are the reasons of why I shelled out extra $10K for my 997.2 C4S vs 997.1 C4S last year (not in order of preference):

1. Easier oil change on .2, you don't have to lift the car to change the oil filter.
2. Bigger brake than .1, albeit by just a little.
3. Revised suspension. The .2 seems to dampen the higher frequency bumps better than .1
3. C4S now comes with mechanical LSD.
4. Electronic F/R differential that reacts faster to driving conditions (so they said).
5. Ventilated seats are finally available. Very important here in CA.
6. New PCM including the Bluetooth, larger screen, iPod integration AND Sat Radio.
7. No IMS (I think this was the biggest reason).
8. DFI (better mileage and more power).
9. Better looking standard wheels (IMHO)
10. LED lighting all around + the adaptive cornering lights (I love it in my BMW).
11. I liked the black keys (.2) better than the silver keys (.1)
12. I loved the silver painted front air inlets on .2 4S's
That is a great summary !
Old 04-01-2016, 04:36 PM
  #45  
Blu311
Burning Brakes
 
Blu311's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,174
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerf4i
Here are the reasons of why I shelled out extra $10K for my 997.2 C4S vs 997.1 C4S last year (not in order of preference):

1. Easier oil change on .2, you don't have to lift the car to change the oil filter.
2. Bigger brake than .1, albeit by just a little.
3. Revised suspension. The .2 seems to dampen the higher frequency bumps better than .1
3. C4S now comes with mechanical LSD.
4. Electronic F/R differential that reacts faster to driving conditions (so they said).
5. Ventilated seats are finally available. Very important here in CA.
6. New PCM including the Bluetooth, larger screen, iPod integration AND Sat Radio.
7. No IMS (I think this was the biggest reason).
8. DFI (better mileage and more power).
9. Better looking standard wheels (IMHO)
10. LED lighting all around + the adaptive cornering lights (I love it in my BMW).
11. I liked the black keys (.2) better than the silver keys (.1)
12. I loved the silver painted front air inlets on .2 4S's
13. I almost forgot the 30 extra HP. It's nice to have some extra power.
14. Bigger side mirrors. What can I say, I am old and bigger mirrors helps.
Originally Posted by Ericson38
That is a great summary !
Yes, great summary!


Quick Reply: 997.1 vs 997.2 and the "big difference"?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:38 PM.