View Poll Results: did YOUR car suffer an IMS failure
Voters: 1659. You may not vote on this poll
IMS failure for your 997 car, Y or N? tell us (yr, 997.1, .2, m96, m97, failure mode)
#631
Ok boys (and girls) I just went through every page of this thread and documented the year and miles of each reported IMS failure. Took me about an hour. I am currently looking for a 997 so was interested in this data. Since there is really no way to use the actual votes to document the needed data, going through the thread was the only other option. I am sure some people voted but did not post in the thread. There may even be people that posted in the thread but did not vote. I only recorded failures on 997 cars. A few people reported Caymans and Boxters but I did not record those even though engines were similar. If someone said his friend had a failure I did not record that either. Remember like everything else on the internet some of this data may not be accurate. Some IMS failures may have actually been other issues that just appeared to be an IMS and some reports may have been trolls. It was not always clear if the 05 failures were early or late builds so I was not able to break that down by build date. I put the 06 or later data at the end of the list.
Reported IMS failures in the thread to date:
Year Mileage Post number
05 36k 24
05 40k 80
05 38k 72 (op had 5 posts)
05 16k 118
05 45k 244
05 ? 272 (op had 1 post)
05 60k 299
05 34k 306
05 35k 332
05 10k 324
05 57k 350 (op had 3 posts)
05 ? 424
05 27k 437
05 10k 458
05 58k 479
05 26k 486
05 17k 575
05 30k 581
05 68k 600
07 75k 110 (op had 1 post)
06 55k 171 (noted it occurred on the track)
06 40k 432
Reported IMS failures in the thread to date:
Year Mileage Post number
05 36k 24
05 40k 80
05 38k 72 (op had 5 posts)
05 16k 118
05 45k 244
05 ? 272 (op had 1 post)
05 60k 299
05 34k 306
05 35k 332
05 10k 324
05 57k 350 (op had 3 posts)
05 ? 424
05 27k 437
05 10k 458
05 58k 479
05 26k 486
05 17k 575
05 30k 581
05 68k 600
07 75k 110 (op had 1 post)
06 55k 171 (noted it occurred on the track)
06 40k 432
Last edited by street rod; 02-14-2016 at 08:27 PM. Reason: added requested info
#632
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Ok boys (and girls) I just went through every page of this thread and documented the year and miles of each reported IMS failure. Took me about an hour. I am currently looking for a 997 so was interested in this data. Since there is really no way to use the actual votes to document the needed data, going through the thread was the only other option. I am sure some people voted but did not post in the thread. There may even be people that posted in the thread but did not vote. I only recorded failures on 997 cars. A few people reported Caymans and Boxters but I did not record those even though engines were similar. If someone said his friend had a failure I did not record that either. Remember like everything else on the internet some of this data may not be accurate. Some IMS failures may have actually been other issues that just appeared to be an IMS and some reports may have been trolls. It was not always clear if the 05 failures were early or late builds so I was not able to break that down by build date. I put the 06 or later data at the end of the list.
Reported IMS failures in the thread to date:
Year Mileage
05 39k
05 40k
05 38k
05 16k
05 45k
05 ?
05 60k
05 34k
05 35k
05 57k
05 ?
05 27k
05 26k
05 17k
05 30k
05 68k
07 75k
06 55k (noted it occurred on the track)
06 40k
Reported IMS failures in the thread to date:
Year Mileage
05 39k
05 40k
05 38k
05 16k
05 45k
05 ?
05 60k
05 34k
05 35k
05 57k
05 ?
05 27k
05 26k
05 17k
05 30k
05 68k
07 75k
06 55k (noted it occurred on the track)
06 40k
#633
Interesting. So only 3 that were not '05 cars and 1 of those was a track failure. Also, I'm curious if you counted reports from people that only had 1 or 2 posts, as I would also eliminate these. Did you capture data whether they were S or non-S cars as there was a rumor that non-S cars received more of the smaller bearings than the S Cars did.
#634
Rennlist Member
Any chance you can go back through your notes and add post numbers to each failure data point? That way we can all go back and quickly find the stories behind each in this thread.
Thanks again!
Last edited by mgordon18; 02-14-2016 at 06:10 PM.
#635
When you run through the list, would you please be so awesome as to jot down the post number of the non '05's? I ask this only because, I feel they may potentially have been forum trolls.
#637
Ok due to several requests I went back and edited my original post and added the post number for each data point and also if the original poster had a very low post count.
#638
#639
Interesting the '06 on page 29, post 432 said the following in a subsequent post when asked if it had a newer bearing:
"Never really asked to be honest, I was quoted for the newer design IMS when it was replaced. I think the manufacture date of the vehicle is a 2005."
The '07 I doubted because he never responded to other posts. And other post '05 was said to be track related. Seems safe to summize there should be need to be concerned with the subsequent larger bearing IMS...
"Never really asked to be honest, I was quoted for the newer design IMS when it was replaced. I think the manufacture date of the vehicle is a 2005."
The '07 I doubted because he never responded to other posts. And other post '05 was said to be track related. Seems safe to summize there should be need to be concerned with the subsequent larger bearing IMS...
#641
Rennlist Member
Interesting the '06 on page 29, post 432 said the following in a subsequent post when asked if it had a newer bearing:
"Never really asked to be honest, I was quoted for the newer design IMS when it was replaced. I think the manufacture date of the vehicle is a 2005."
The '07 I doubted because he never responded to other posts. And other post '05 was said to be track related. Seems safe to summize there should be need to be concerned with the subsequent larger bearing IMS...
"Never really asked to be honest, I was quoted for the newer design IMS when it was replaced. I think the manufacture date of the vehicle is a 2005."
The '07 I doubted because he never responded to other posts. And other post '05 was said to be track related. Seems safe to summize there should be need to be concerned with the subsequent larger bearing IMS...