Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My Oil Analysis Trends - Questions and Comments Please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2024, 10:49 AM
  #1  
Bruce In Philly
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Bruce In Philly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 6,329
Likes: 0
Received 1,654 Likes on 987 Posts
Default My Oil Analysis Trends - Questions and Comments Please

2009 C2S 196K miles

If you have an analysis you want to post, do not post here, post it here where there is a collection of posts: https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...-analysis.html

So.... what do you think? Why the curves... shouldn't the lines be generally flat given my test/change intervals? Pete: give me some good news please!!!

Coupla items:
- Ceratec apparently contains quite a bit of Moly as well as their ceramic stuff - note the oil sample where I used LM MoS2 had the least moly in the sample.
- Oils are all Porsche approved A40 plus an additive (first sample I am not sure what I did, I think I had MoS2 in there)
- All Blackstone

Peace
Bruce in Philly (now Atlanta)




Last edited by Bruce In Philly; 02-22-2024 at 11:21 AM.
Old 02-22-2024, 12:07 PM
  #2  
MrMoose
Burning Brakes
 
MrMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 958
Received 391 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Boron and moly (and zinc / phosphorus / calcium while we're at it) are almost certainly from oil additives: either those in the oil itself or the stuff you're adding. Monitoring them doesn't really tell you anything useful.

I think all you can really say from this is that your engine looks okay, and your wear metals look fine and are consistent across a variety of oils and additives. I don't think you're getting anything useful out of these regular measurements (especially with 196K on the clock) so you can probably just stop doing it, but it's your money.
Old 02-22-2024, 03:56 PM
  #3  
silver_tt
Rennlist Member
 
silver_tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 764
Received 243 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Wear looks decent but would be lower if you used a better quality oil. Most of your samples have sheared down into a SAE 30 grade, especially considering you added 1.75 quarts in the 5K mile OCI.
Old 02-23-2024, 04:56 AM
  #4  
8x57IRS
Racer
 
8x57IRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 493
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Everything looks very even, no significant outliers. If the oil filter is also always evenly "loaded", I would be happy with that motor. Btw, I would avoid additives, quality oils are sufficiently additivated.
The following users liked this post:
MrMoose (02-23-2024)
Old 02-23-2024, 09:32 AM
  #5  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 26,309
Received 6,764 Likes on 4,304 Posts
Default

Brice,

It's nice and stable, but as I've mentioned in oil threads before, LM and M1 both show higher bearing wear than Driven does. You'll get lower metal wear numbers if you switch to Driven DI40 for your DFI engine - it will have the Moly in it already and higher zinc and Phosphorous and why the non-akumimun metals will go down.

Other than the iron wear numbers which aren't super high, just marginally high, your engine looks good, especially for the mileage
​​​​​​.



Quick Reply: My Oil Analysis Trends - Questions and Comments Please



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:55 AM.