Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Exhaust back pressure video. I'm confused.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2018, 01:57 PM
  #1  
IX XI
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
IX XI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default Exhaust back pressure video. I'm confused.

I follow this guy on YouTube as his videos are very informative. He recently posted a video regarding exhaust back pressure:


But I'm confused. I thought the 997s needed some back pressure so as not to lose low end torque. For example, no cats vs 200 cell cats vs stock cats. And to fake it one step further, x-pipe design vs stock design vs the FVD U-design.

So, does a lack of back pressure mean an average net loss of power in the 997, or an overall net gain with simply a shift in the power band?
Old 01-01-2018, 02:23 PM
  #2  
Doug H
Nordschleife Master
 
Doug H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Destin, Nashville, In a 458 Challenge
Posts: 5,128
Received 903 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

It is more an issue of scavenging. Exhaust functions on pulses. Lower RMPs have larger gaps in the pulses and create pressure to pull the following pulse out the pipe like a drafting race car. The pulses get closer and almost instantaneous at high rpms. At low rpms or in the torque bands, you want a smaller diameter pipe to create more pressure and a larger pipe at high rpms to minimize pressure drop. Since you can only have only system, it is a compromise. You can go too free flowing to maximize peak hp, but it can reduce scavenging effect compromising lower end torque. Scavenging is comparable to creating vacuum pressure like race cars drafting off each other.
Old 01-01-2018, 02:32 PM
  #3  
BillNye
Racer
 
BillNye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: pseudoscience
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Guy is kinda an idiot. He frequently over simplifies things to the point of being incorrect. And he's completely sold out to the clickbait titles and stuff (which is mostly a pet peeve).
Starting @2:40. Everything is compromises, some small amount of back pressure is a byproduct to improvements of other characteristics.

Last edited by BillNye; 01-01-2018 at 04:16 PM.
Old 01-01-2018, 02:45 PM
  #4  
IX XI
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
IX XI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Good replies, echoes how I understood it to work on these cars.
Old 01-01-2018, 02:53 PM
  #5  
Doug H
Nordschleife Master
 
Doug H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Destin, Nashville, In a 458 Challenge
Posts: 5,128
Received 903 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IX XI
Good replies, echoes how I understood it to work on these cars.
The problem is terminology or semantics and efforts to over simplify. I did not watch the video, but he also may talking about cheaper cars where the exhaust systems are bunk and super restrictive. For the most part, exhaust systems on high end sports cars are pretty well tuned for all around performance so you can end up with trade-offs when trying to offer after market solutions.

Back in the day, I spent a whole lot of time on the dyno running cat bypasses, primary by passes, secondary bypasses and various combinations along with a stand alone fuel management system to try and optimize tune for each configuration. Learned a lot back then when tuning and setting up my various cars for street or track applications, but it has been a while.
Old 01-01-2018, 03:49 PM
  #6  
Bruce In Philly
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Bruce In Philly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
Received 1,410 Likes on 855 Posts
Default

Some reads.......

https://motordyneengineering.com/exh...nd-scavenging/
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/engin...-inch-exhaust/

Peace
Bruce in Philly

Old 01-01-2018, 04:42 PM
  #7  
ADias
Nordschleife Master
 
ADias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southwest
Posts: 8,295
Received 384 Likes on 268 Posts
Default

The value of that video and this thread is to show that *****-nilly tinkering with exhausts may reduce performance.
Old 01-01-2018, 04:54 PM
  #8  
IX XI
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
IX XI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Bruce, thanks for the links. Very informative.

ADias, I tend to agree. Thus far the mods I've done are purely cosmetic (wheels, wheel spacers, exhaust tips), and all suspension related where I feel there is a real cost/performance benefit to be had (H&R springs, TPC DSC, GT3 sway bars and drop links, more aggressive alignment).

I've been thinking about getting an exhaust but not sure if there are improvements to be found that are worth the monetary investment or if I should stick with just mufflers for some sound improvement.
Old 01-02-2018, 12:07 AM
  #9  
Frederic944
Rennlist Member
 
Frederic944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

follow this guy on YouTube as his videos are very informative. He recently posted a video regarding exhaust back pressure
=> Actually, it's a good video and describe in pretty simple words the actual phenomenon happening during the exhaust part of the 4 strokes cycle.
OEM spends quite a lot of money and development time to have the lowest exhaust back-pressure as it's detrimental for performance and efficiency. I.d. FE.
Old 01-02-2018, 10:21 AM
  #10  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,268
Received 6,140 Likes on 3,913 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IX XI
I thought the 997s needed some back pressure so as not to lose low end torque.
This is one reason why the OEM PSE system when on Sport mode closes the valves when RPMs drop and then reopens them once they're higher again. Helps reduce one of the compromises with exhaust systems by supplying the higher back pressure at low RPMs for increased torque, and less restrictive at higher RPMs for increased flow and power, yet PSE owners continue to disconnect the vacuum actuator to prevent them from closing by themselves because they prefer the louder sound all of the time.
Old 01-02-2018, 12:19 PM
  #11  
IX XI
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
IX XI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Petza914
This is one reason why the OEM PSE system when on Sport mode closes the valves when RPMs drop and then reopens them once they're higher again. Helps reduce one of the compromises with exhaust systems by supplying the higher back pressure at low RPMs for increased torque, and less restrictive at higher RPMs for increased flow and power, yet PSE owners continue to disconnect the vacuum actuator to prevent them from closing by themselves because they prefer the louder sound all of the time.
That's interesting. I didn't know it was an active system, I thought it was either on or off at all times.
I also didn't think the mufflers alone had that much influence on the system as a whole with regard to back pressure. I thought most of the back pressure was Introduced by stock headers and cats.

I like the idea of a freer flowing system and definitely welcome the sound improvement (as well as any performance improvements) but I'm worried about losing torque at the low end. 99.9% of my driving is on the streets where low end torque is nice to have.
Old 01-02-2018, 12:27 PM
  #12  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,268
Received 6,140 Likes on 3,913 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IX XI


That's interesting. I didn't know it was an active system, I thought it was either on or off at all times.
I also didn't think the mufflers alone had that much influence on the system as a whole with regard to back pressure. I thought most of the back pressure was Introduced by stock headers and cats.

I like the idea of a freer flowing system and definitely welcome the sound improvement (as well as any performance improvements) but I'm worried about losing torque at the low end. 99.9% of my driving is on the streets where low end torque is nice to have.
Fabspeed doesn't make their valvetronic exhaust for the 997.1 cars any longer (like what I have, and neither does Tubi), but I believe both FVD and cargraphic still offer a valved exhaust for the 997.1 that can be tied into the stock PSE controller or run from a remote (but then you probably lose the stock Porsche programming for the active open/close).
Old 01-02-2018, 12:43 PM
  #13  
the_buch
Rennlist Member
 
the_buch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,361
Received 82 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Thanks all ... I learned a couple of things here I didn't know before.
Old 01-02-2018, 12:59 PM
  #14  
Frederic944
Rennlist Member
 
Frederic944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

For your information, the Porsche PSE has not benefits in term of performance, it has been designed and sold as just an enhancement for the sound, that's it.

And please, someone, please explain to us how back pressure can improve any torque at any RPM, more exhaust back pressure will just leave more burnt mixture in the cylinder, thus leading to decreasing the VE, how could it improve the performance? it just hurts performance! Now, if you talk about emissions, yes, having exhaust gas trapped in the cylinder will cool off the combustion and reduce Nox.
Old 01-02-2018, 01:17 PM
  #15  
IX XI
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
IX XI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Frederic944
For your information, the Porsche PSE has not benefits in term of performance, it has been designed and sold as just an enhancement for the sound, that's it.

And please, someone, please explain to us how back pressure can improve any torque at any RPM, more exhaust back pressure will just leave more burnt mixture in the cylinder, thus leading to decreasing the VE, how could it improve the performance? it just hurts performance! Now, if you talk about emissions, yes, having exhaust gas trapped in the cylinder will cool off the combustion and reduce Nox.
I always thought the mufflers had no bearing on performance, whereas headers and cats did.

Then again I'm not an engineer so hoping to get a better understanding of it here.


Quick Reply: Exhaust back pressure video. I'm confused.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:00 PM.