Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Need advice on potential 2003 996TT buy

Old 03-22-2017, 12:07 PM
  #16  
Berra
Pro
 
Berra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

It all depends on how it's been stored, but usually time will tear parts, BUT...I don't agree with some here saying "yes". This is not a fact, my own car is proof enough for me so I can atleast speak for myself and say no, low mileage will not always give trouble.

I bought mine at 19k miles and 6+k miles later I've done nothing except for service and car is still as new.
Old 03-22-2017, 12:47 PM
  #17  
Grey
5th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Grey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Berra
It all depends on how it's been stored, but usually time will tear parts, BUT...I don't agree with some here saying "yes". This is not a fact, my own car is proof enough for me so I can atleast speak for myself and say no, low mileage will not always give trouble.

I bought mine at 19k miles and 6+k miles later I've done nothing except for service and car is still as new.
That's good to know too. What year is your 996 and when did you acquire it?
Old 03-22-2017, 01:12 PM
  #18  
s65e90
Drifting
 
s65e90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,225
Received 719 Likes on 497 Posts
Default

Low miles on an older car will def show as you'll have to replace things. Saying 6k miles trouble free is not that impressive as it's only 6k miles. These cars are very reliable but need to be driven like anything else, it's a machine.
Old 03-22-2017, 01:31 PM
  #19  
Berra
Pro
 
Berra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Grey
That's good to know too. What year is your 996 and when did you acquire it?
Mine is a 2003 too and I bought it in November 2014. The shop where I service the car has gone through the whole car twice since then and they've told me it's basically brand new. It had 2 former owners, first owner had it for 7 years and second one had it 4 years. None of them drove it much, never seen rain etc.

I am aware that it's always good to drive a car but I will never agree that low mileage equals trouble. It may cause issues, but it's not a fact.
Old 03-22-2017, 07:25 PM
  #20  
manimal
Rennlist Member
 
manimal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,486
Received 106 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I don't think anyone's claiming that you're guaranteed to have issues, but at a certain point, extremely low miles do increase the possibility.

6k is not much of a sample. I'm sure Macster had 6k+ stints of trouble free miles in his 120k+ of miles. I have about 6k of relatively trouble-free miles on mine, as well (38k => 44k), but I'm not about to jump to any conclusions based on that experience.
Old 03-23-2017, 11:44 AM
  #21  
Berra
Pro
 
Berra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by manimal
I don't think anyone's claiming that you're guaranteed to have issues, but at a certain point, extremely low miles do increase the possibility.

6k is not much of a sample. I'm sure Macster had 6k+ stints of trouble free miles in his 120k+ of miles. I have about 6k of relatively trouble-free miles on mine, as well (38k => 44k), but I'm not about to jump to any conclusions based on that experience.
Issues can happen any car at any given moment, low miles or not.

I clearly said that age + low miles can indeed have an affect on the car but it's not a fact or a guarantee that it will.

Macster said Yes to that question but I see now that he edited his answer. I'm not trying to go head to head here, just sharing my experience with my own car and the fact that I've told my shop to check things up on the car Twice is because of this. I wanted to make sure that it wasn't harmed by just sitting in the garage.

I have records from day 1 and my car has seen as little as 600 miles a year with it's first owner. Second owner stacked up some miles, but never drove in rain etc.
Old 03-26-2017, 10:30 PM
  #22  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,131
Received 766 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Grey
My questions are if this is a reasonable price and if the low mileage is potentially a problem.
The price is more than reasonable, and I wouldn't at all be concerned about the mileage.
Old 03-29-2017, 12:52 PM
  #23  
Twinturbofan
Intermediate
 
Twinturbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I also would not use a dealer for a ppi. When I bought my car, got a clean bill of health from dealer ppl. Shortly there after, when complaining about how it drove to my indy mechanic he found many issues including a bent right front strut! That should have been caught by the dealer.
Old 03-30-2017, 04:47 PM
  #24  
Shadetree930
Instructor
 
Shadetree930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tail of the Dragon Country
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I would buy the car sight unseen. If not, it will be gone.
Old 03-31-2017, 09:34 AM
  #25  
Stephencs601
Rennlist Member
 
Stephencs601's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Long Island
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

I bought my 03 X50 with 27K for 40K from a MB dealer. Had no clue what they had.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Need advice on potential 2003 996TT buy



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:29 AM.