Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Quick question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2013, 12:56 PM
  #1  
Lightningmcnulty
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Lightningmcnulty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Quick question

Hey guys

I just sold my 951 and will be buying a 966tt, I just wanted some opinions on purchasing.

I see that a 50000+ mile model is usually the $40000 range and 30000- model is around $50000 usually.

I know that my 951 wore its miles really well so assuming everything else is equal what the better buy, i'm not looking for an investment just a fun car but its not worth saving $10000 if a higher mileage model is more prone to issues?!

also is it worth shelling out for the x50 models, I will be upgrading the car anyway including eventually the turbo's I would think, what the opinions on this.

I have looked back though a ton of pages and done searches and there is snippets of info about these two subjects but I figured i'd still ask just to clarify it in my mind, it might be good if someone could make a buyers guide sticky, I would do it but I don't have the knowledge.

thanks

Kim
Old 12-09-2013, 01:27 PM
  #2  
rmc1148
Drifting
 
rmc1148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lancaster Pa
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I prefer lower miles and honestly believe all being equal with good maintenances and not being abused it worth the extra cost over higher and at resale it is easier to sell with less. Most people here seem to like higher miles and they have their points but I go by my own experience. If you plan on owning a long time and put considerable miles on you car it might be better to go cheaper with higher miles especially if you do your own maintenance. The x50 package is nice but if you are going to upgrade turbos etc its a waste of money.
Old 12-09-2013, 01:46 PM
  #3  
PORSCHE_TECH
Cruisin'
 
PORSCHE_TECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

996 Turbos are usually good strong cars with minimal problems. A motor with slightly more miles will not make much difference since those motors are really reliable. With vehicle your interested in make sure you take it on a good hard test drive, and that its boosting properly sounds and looks well maintained.
Old 12-09-2013, 02:15 PM
  #4  
judd944
Rennlist Member
 
judd944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lexington, KY !!!!
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

You will love the car.

I went lower miles but only because it had modifications so the 8k more I paid got me both low miles and mods I wanted. win/win.
I would have had no problem getting a car with 60k instead of 30k to save $10k.

if you get a clutch be sure to get a stage 2.5 unit in it for the additional torque. I wish I did. I have been running stock software for more than a year.
Old 12-09-2013, 04:35 PM
  #5  
fly2low
Rennlist Member
 
fly2low's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am on my second 996TT
I have been around my own, plus have friends with 996TTs of various years
Instead of worrying about year or miles, I wanted to know the history of the car, and the results of a ppi. Tracked vs not, maintenance schedule, mods, ets
Old 12-09-2013, 05:42 PM
  #6  
NoGaBiker
Drifting
 
NoGaBiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Midtown Atlanta
Posts: 3,378
Received 224 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Low miles is nice, especially if you are a nit-picky person about your car. Having less wear on interior especially is nice, as ratty interior pieces can be a pain to replace.

I think your pricing might be a few thousand high (I think 50k gets you down about 15,000 miles for a non-X50 car), but not too far off.

I bought an X50 earlier this spring with 17,000 miles. Pretty loaded '02 with an MSRP of 148,500. I intended to keep the car largely stock, with only a few easily reversible mods (like exhaust, suspension.) Couldn't be happier. But if I were looking to mod the car, I don't know that paying more for an X50 is wise, since a big part of that huge (almost $18,000 MSRP!) cost is for the K24 turbos. If I were planning to change those elements I'd skip the X50.
Old 12-10-2013, 12:41 AM
  #7  
Lightningmcnulty
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Lightningmcnulty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That's good to know, I will broaden my search for higher miles and just judge the cars individually.

thanks everyone

Kim
Old 12-10-2013, 12:12 PM
  #8  
JG 996T
Rennlist Member
 
JG 996T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,146
Received 489 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

Maintenance history is more important than mileage. Lots of high mileage examples out there running well. That said, you are looking at a ten year old car - water pumps, power steering pumps, plugs, O2s, etc may be due - maintenance is not cheap.

That said, its a great car - probably nothing comparable available in the market at this price point.

Buyers guide attached. Have fun finding your next ride.
Attached Images
Old 12-10-2013, 01:48 PM
  #9  
Lightningmcnulty
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Lightningmcnulty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That's a great write up, thanks



Quick Reply: Quick question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:03 AM.