Which one for me: E39 M5 or 996TT?
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
First of all, hello! I've been lurking through many, many threads here and on 6speedonline.
Which one for me: E39 M5 or 996TT?
These may seem like odd cars to compare, but I've narrowed it down to these; stay with me here.
Both are awesome, highly regarded machines that have depreciated the majority of what they will. I’ve tried to reason this to myself, and just want to pull some outside opinion into the mix.
Background on me:
- I’m single, debt free, and have no responsibilities aside from my job.
- I’ve owned a bunch of cool and high powered cars so far (C5 Z06, blown NSX, 600hp Supra, Stock Twin Supra, LS1 RX7, etc...)
- I get bored easily and I only own cars for a few months to maybe a little over a year or so.
- I only buy cars that have mostly depreciated and get into something else for little, if no loss, on a whim. I don’t mind enjoying cars long after they were the big deal.
- I don’t spend money on much else.
Background on intended usage, needs:
- This will be my only car, but I have a reliable fuel-injected/water cooled motorcycle which I try to ride as often as possible.
- I commute 2 miles city one way now, but will change to 15 miles highway commute in a few weeks due to a move.
- I usually don’t need to carry any more than 1 passenger; opportunities to carry more passengers are optional.
- I can’t drive anything normal or mundane, just not in my nature.
- I like big power, I don’t get to use it that often, but when I want it - I want it.
- Some sort of mod-ability is important.
- MPG is a psychological thing for me, so it does matter, but I do have the 40mpg on the bike.
- Reliability is important, but I don’t usually own cars for more than a few thousand miles.
- I've been to an HPDE once, and liked it, but don't see myself taking the car more than 2 times per year.
My thoughts so far:
- 2001-2002 996 Turbo – Awesome looks, OK interior, great power, very responsive to mods. A little more MPG than the M5. Most owners report them to be pretty reliable aside from a seemingly week transmission in a few cases. Catch is I will have to take a small loan out to get one (nothing that will upset my monthly earnings significantly, but will be something I notice). Insurance is 50% more than M5.
- 2001-2002 E39 M5 – Good looks, great interior, good power, mediocre response to mods. Just a tad less MPG than the 996TT. Extra doors and bigger back seats. Navigation standard and better than Porsche nav. Most owners report them to be pretty reliable aside from a few minor common problems. Insurance will be 50% less than the 996TT but also save me 62% versus my current toy (RX7). Greatest advantage is that I can pay cash for one of these.
Thoughts? I have not driven either car, so that could be a major turnoff (like the E46 M3 was).
Thanks!
Daniel
Which one for me: E39 M5 or 996TT?
These may seem like odd cars to compare, but I've narrowed it down to these; stay with me here.
Both are awesome, highly regarded machines that have depreciated the majority of what they will. I’ve tried to reason this to myself, and just want to pull some outside opinion into the mix.
Background on me:
- I’m single, debt free, and have no responsibilities aside from my job.
- I’ve owned a bunch of cool and high powered cars so far (C5 Z06, blown NSX, 600hp Supra, Stock Twin Supra, LS1 RX7, etc...)
- I get bored easily and I only own cars for a few months to maybe a little over a year or so.
- I only buy cars that have mostly depreciated and get into something else for little, if no loss, on a whim. I don’t mind enjoying cars long after they were the big deal.
- I don’t spend money on much else.
Background on intended usage, needs:
- This will be my only car, but I have a reliable fuel-injected/water cooled motorcycle which I try to ride as often as possible.
- I commute 2 miles city one way now, but will change to 15 miles highway commute in a few weeks due to a move.
- I usually don’t need to carry any more than 1 passenger; opportunities to carry more passengers are optional.
- I can’t drive anything normal or mundane, just not in my nature.
- I like big power, I don’t get to use it that often, but when I want it - I want it.
- Some sort of mod-ability is important.
- MPG is a psychological thing for me, so it does matter, but I do have the 40mpg on the bike.
- Reliability is important, but I don’t usually own cars for more than a few thousand miles.
- I've been to an HPDE once, and liked it, but don't see myself taking the car more than 2 times per year.
My thoughts so far:
- 2001-2002 996 Turbo – Awesome looks, OK interior, great power, very responsive to mods. A little more MPG than the M5. Most owners report them to be pretty reliable aside from a seemingly week transmission in a few cases. Catch is I will have to take a small loan out to get one (nothing that will upset my monthly earnings significantly, but will be something I notice). Insurance is 50% more than M5.
- 2001-2002 E39 M5 – Good looks, great interior, good power, mediocre response to mods. Just a tad less MPG than the 996TT. Extra doors and bigger back seats. Navigation standard and better than Porsche nav. Most owners report them to be pretty reliable aside from a few minor common problems. Insurance will be 50% less than the 996TT but also save me 62% versus my current toy (RX7). Greatest advantage is that I can pay cash for one of these.
Thoughts? I have not driven either car, so that could be a major turnoff (like the E46 M3 was).
Thanks!
Daniel
#2
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hi Daniel,
I assume you've posted on an M forum as well, you are bound to get fairly biased views on both sites?? For my 2c, after having an M3 and now a 964 Turbo 2, the feeling from the Turbo, Porsche kudos is far greater. M5's as good a reputation as they have, do still loose money. You will never get away from the fact they look similar to the rest of the 5 series range, are far more common etc. I love the looks of the 996TT, (not in my budget yet I'm afraid, although you boys are getting closer!!) it's a class car, not on many driveways, and once you've had a Porsche will be hard to replace.
So to make sure I'm clear, get the 996TT all day long. Either way it's always a hoot looking for and buying cars, so good luck
Steve
I assume you've posted on an M forum as well, you are bound to get fairly biased views on both sites?? For my 2c, after having an M3 and now a 964 Turbo 2, the feeling from the Turbo, Porsche kudos is far greater. M5's as good a reputation as they have, do still loose money. You will never get away from the fact they look similar to the rest of the 5 series range, are far more common etc. I love the looks of the 996TT, (not in my budget yet I'm afraid, although you boys are getting closer!!) it's a class car, not on many driveways, and once you've had a Porsche will be hard to replace.
So to make sure I'm clear, get the 996TT all day long. Either way it's always a hoot looking for and buying cars, so good luck
Steve
#3
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for the response! I figured I would get biased responses as you noted, so I did post on the M5 board as well. Interestingly, a few of the M5er's have noted that if they didn't need the 4 doors, they'd go with the 996 Turbo all day long.
-Daniel
#4
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![jumper](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/jumper.gif)
Steve
#5
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
#6
Intermediate
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Daniel,
I have both cars, having had the E39 M5 for 7 years and the 996TT for 3 months. Apart from the space and comfort, the 996TT is a step up in a number of areas (acceleration, looks, handling, prestige) and is basically more fun to drive. Although the E39 M5 is a classic and a very good car, with a great balance of luxury with performance unparalleled for its time, I think you should go for 996TT. My E39 M5 is up for sale now as it just never gets driven.
Good luck!
I have both cars, having had the E39 M5 for 7 years and the 996TT for 3 months. Apart from the space and comfort, the 996TT is a step up in a number of areas (acceleration, looks, handling, prestige) and is basically more fun to drive. Although the E39 M5 is a classic and a very good car, with a great balance of luxury with performance unparalleled for its time, I think you should go for 996TT. My E39 M5 is up for sale now as it just never gets driven.
Good luck!
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Bethesda, MD
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hi Daniel,
I had a 328i for 9 yrs. (very reliable, good mpg), then traded up to an '03 C4 Cab. Both were great cars but neither had enough power for me. So, I traded the Cab for an '03 996TT... and won't be going back. The M5 is a very good car, but it can't keep up with the Turbo, especially once mods are made. Plus, as powerful as the M5 is, it has a family sedan appeal (imo). The 996TT, on the other hand, doesn't. And, it's a great daily driver as well as a super track car w/a few mods. Turbo!
Linda
'03 996TT
I had a 328i for 9 yrs. (very reliable, good mpg), then traded up to an '03 C4 Cab. Both were great cars but neither had enough power for me. So, I traded the Cab for an '03 996TT... and won't be going back. The M5 is a very good car, but it can't keep up with the Turbo, especially once mods are made. Plus, as powerful as the M5 is, it has a family sedan appeal (imo). The 996TT, on the other hand, doesn't. And, it's a great daily driver as well as a super track car w/a few mods. Turbo!
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
Linda
'03 996TT
#9
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Maybe I'm not getting something, but isn't an early model of the BMW worth something like $25,000? In today's market, especially in comparison to the performance of that car and a newer 3 series, you could be in as low as $21,000. There are a lot of choices in that market, including the E55 which is a huge value.
I don't think you will get a good 996tt for less than $47,000, so the price ranges are quite far apart.
Since both are off warranty, there is significant risk of expensive repairs with either, but my experience with both brands suggests the BMW will have more problems, and more expensive problems.
I really think this boils down to what you can afford. If mid-20's is your comfort zone, then that is your answer. I don't think it is a good move to go in over your head on a used car. With th tt, you would need to decide that you are willing to spend the necessary amount, AND leave $5,000 in reserve for the unanticipated repair. The car will still be a bargain, but that is only valid if one can afford it. AS
I don't think you will get a good 996tt for less than $47,000, so the price ranges are quite far apart.
Since both are off warranty, there is significant risk of expensive repairs with either, but my experience with both brands suggests the BMW will have more problems, and more expensive problems.
I really think this boils down to what you can afford. If mid-20's is your comfort zone, then that is your answer. I don't think it is a good move to go in over your head on a used car. With th tt, you would need to decide that you are willing to spend the necessary amount, AND leave $5,000 in reserve for the unanticipated repair. The car will still be a bargain, but that is only valid if one can afford it. AS
#12
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
^^ Alexander, you make some good points. In terms of the of Porsche, I would anticipate paying around 45-50k and as such I would have a small payment versus outright buying the M5. The positive note is that I most definitely have the reserve covered, would hate for the expensive repair to come about, but would be ready.
Honestly, neither of these cars is a practical purchase, but that is what I'm into.
Lots of great feedback here. Thanks!
Honestly, neither of these cars is a practical purchase, but that is what I'm into.
Lots of great feedback here. Thanks!
#13
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter