Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Typical Number of Range 1 and Range 2 Events?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2018, 12:48 PM
  #1  
docwyte
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
docwyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: denver, co
Posts: 7,383
Received 486 Likes on 324 Posts
Default Typical Number of Range 1 and Range 2 Events?

Got the UMW data logger and was able to pull my Range 1 and Range 2 ignition numbers. What's considered a normal amount for them? What's low end and what's excessive?
Old 08-01-2018, 01:28 PM
  #2  
Road King
Three Wheelin'
 
Road King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,272
Received 74 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

I'm sure if you post your #s you'll get lots of feedback. Obviously the lower the better for Type 2s, and we like to see a decent amount of hours passed after the last Type 2.
Old 08-01-2018, 02:22 PM
  #3  
manimal
Rennlist Member
 
manimal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,486
Received 106 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I don't think there's a "typical" number. Range 1's are expected on a car that's been driven, and max out at 2^16 = 65,536. Range 2's are hopefully close to 0 and a long time ago.
Old 08-01-2018, 04:29 PM
  #4  
pfbz
Rennlist Member
 
pfbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: US
Posts: 7,579
Received 2,718 Likes on 1,461 Posts
Default

On 996 gen cars, the over-rev report isn't terribly useful. You'll get range one counts just from driving the car the way it is meant to be driven, and it is possible to accumulate some range two WITHOUT a mechanical over-rev, just by hitting rev limiter on fast accel (sometimes phantom range 2's as well).

A high range two count with a low number of hours between last event and current hours is the only thing that might cause any concern at all imho.

997 expanded to six ranges, so you can really see if there was a mechanical over rev.
Old 08-01-2018, 04:39 PM
  #5  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 10,703
Received 2,221 Likes on 1,432 Posts
Default

^ +1
Old 08-01-2018, 04:39 PM
  #6  
T10Chris
Three Wheelin'
 
T10Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,404
Received 160 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

you can hit range 2s in 996 just by running through the gears and shifting fast at redline, or by revving it in neutral. over rev report on these cars is basically useless.
Old 08-02-2018, 12:15 PM
  #7  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,708
Received 402 Likes on 254 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pfbz
On 996 gen cars, the over-rev report isn't terribly useful. You'll get range one counts just from driving the car the way it is meant to be driven, and it is possible to accumulate some range two WITHOUT a mechanical over-rev, just by hitting rev limiter on fast accel (sometimes phantom range 2's as well).

A high range two count with a low number of hours between last event and current hours is the only thing that might cause any concern at all imho.

997 expanded to six ranges, so you can really see if there was a mechanical over rev.
What was the first generation of Porsche turbos to provide overrange reports? Was it available in the NA cars or just the turbos?
Old 08-02-2018, 07:34 PM
  #8  
Jon Beatty
Track Day
 
Jon Beatty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denver, NC, USA
Posts: 22
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

AFAIK the 996 was the first 911 to have over rev counters and yes, the 996 2 ranges are indicative of the way the car was driven but they don't have enough granularity to be terribly useful IMHO.
What I'd like to know is if you have a range 2, can I assume that also triggered a range 1? Not particularly useful and maybe academic but when you get to the 997's with 6 ranges, it potentially does make a difference. Also, since the ECU is just counting ignitions you get 3 counts for every complete turn of the crank at that range level. So, if someone does do the money shift yet escapes catastrophic damage (at least immediately) will you get a flurry of range 2's say if you hit 8k RPM's? I'm assuming the answer is yes but unless the ECU would log the timestamp of each over rev count, it is again academic. Only the most recent over rev ignition has a timestamp.
I also agree that you can get a range 2 just by aggressive driving and not by a mechanical over rev. In talking to a good friend who is a certified Porsche mechanic, accelerating hard in a low gear and shifting at or close to red line, the momentum of the engine will trigger a range 2. He called it a "rev flair".
Old 08-03-2018, 09:20 AM
  #9  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,708
Received 402 Likes on 254 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jon Beatty
AFAIK the 996 was the first 911 to have over rev counters and yes, the 996 2 ranges are indicative of the way the car was driven but they don't have enough granularity to be terribly useful IMHO.
What I'd like to know is if you have a range 2, can I assume that also triggered a range 1? Not particularly useful and maybe academic but when you get to the 997's with 6 ranges, it potentially does make a difference. Also, since the ECU is just counting ignitions you get 3 counts for every complete turn of the crank at that range level. So, if someone does do the money shift yet escapes catastrophic damage (at least immediately) will you get a flurry of range 2's say if you hit 8k RPM's? I'm assuming the answer is yes but unless the ECU would log the timestamp of each over rev count, it is again academic. Only the most recent over rev ignition has a timestamp.
I also agree that you can get a range 2 just by aggressive driving and not by a mechanical over rev. In talking to a good friend who is a certified Porsche mechanic, accelerating hard in a low gear and shifting at or close to red line, the momentum of the engine will trigger a range 2. He called it a "rev flair".
I'm thinking it's the money shifts everyone wants to detect, not bumping off red line during hard acceleration. Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't our cars have the same rev limiters installed that the older ones had? My understanding is the rev limiter can't protect from a money shift but can act in time to protect from what you call rev flair. That doesn't mean it woudn't still register on the counter as a range 2.
Old 08-03-2018, 11:43 AM
  #10  
FRUNKenstein
Rennlist Member
 
FRUNKenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 6,013
Received 297 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Despite the fact that the general consensus among knowledgeable people is that the DME report isn't terribly useful on a 996TT, you will still get buyers all "revved up" over a DME report supplied with a PPI. Although I don't consider myself an expert, as I understand it, this is especially if the car has a tune to raise the redline. Someone with more knowledge than I can speak to the issue of the effect of a tune on a DME over-rev report.
Old 08-03-2018, 01:27 PM
  #11  
manimal
Rennlist Member
 
manimal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,486
Received 106 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by autobonrun
I'm thinking it's the money shifts everyone wants to detect, not bumping off red line during hard acceleration. Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't our cars have the same rev limiters installed that the older ones had? My understanding is the rev limiter can't protect from a money shift but can act in time to protect from what you call rev flair. That doesn't mean it woudn't still register on the counter as a range 2.
That is correct.

A lot of folks out there seem to have the (incorrect) assumption that all Range 2's indicate a mechanical overrev. I'm glad we're correcting the myth around here.
Old 08-03-2018, 08:07 PM
  #12  
pfbz
Rennlist Member
 
pfbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: US
Posts: 7,579
Received 2,718 Likes on 1,461 Posts
Default

And for every individual person here that gets the correct picture, 100 new folks get the incorrect story over on BAT...
The following users liked this post:
brontosaurus (02-25-2021)
Old 08-04-2018, 03:57 PM
  #13  
docwyte
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
docwyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: denver, co
Posts: 7,383
Received 486 Likes on 324 Posts
Default

Isn't that the truth...
Old 08-04-2018, 04:32 PM
  #14  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,813
Received 1,705 Likes on 994 Posts
Default

Overrevs on 996s are relatively meaningless besides indicating you probably have a raised redline. I installed a brand new ECU four years ago with 0/0 across the board and within 10k miles have maxed out both range 1s and 2s at 65k+ each with no mechanical overrevs. If you miss a shift and zing it high enough to damage it, you’ll know it...
Old 08-06-2018, 10:20 AM
  #15  
FASTTRIP
Instructor
 
FASTTRIP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 205
Received 27 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

If a 996 turbo is running a Cobb tuner say in valet mode does anyone know if I go over 4 k rpm which is the limit set by program would that show as over rev on ECU. Or would it be cleared when going back to factory tune. I leave it on valet teaching my son to drive manual to keep over revs if by accident down while he is learning.


Quick Reply: Typical Number of Range 1 and Range 2 Events?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:20 PM.