Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Another brake question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2010, 09:51 PM
  #16  
jasonfreed
Rennlist Member
 
jasonfreed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I used Hawk Blues and Black on a Rx-7... the dust generated by these at the time was CAUSTIC beyond belief. If the dust mixed with rain car and wheels were stained pretty badly.
Is HT10 dust similar to this?
I ran Hawk Blues with a big brake kit on my old Audi and agree, the brake dust was terribly caustic.

Never had a problem with HT-10s or DTC70's.
Old 06-23-2010, 05:51 PM
  #17  
CT03911
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CT03911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have cross referenced a few places and it turns out the Centric rotors are drilled anyways. There was some confusion for me as I initially looked into it, now there is not.
The Tire Rack cost for Centrics is above what you can buy Porsche drilled rears anyways but therein lies another question anyways.
What is the exact difference between OEM, Cup and thirdly "Motorsport" equipment and specifically rear rotors.
Are cups and motorsports the same? How do they differ from OEM?
Lastly, as we appear to be stuck with drilled rears unless you spend big $, we all know they crack vs wear out.
Pagid says this in my recent conversation with them. They are drilled to save weight. The drilled OR slotted rotors perform better gas evacuation and removing pad dust than solid. We pretty much knew this but there are some who say modern pads don't outgass. They do. Too bad we can't get an ATE priced slotted for the rear. While heavier than drilled they last longer and thats what I want: cheaper and better even if they weigh a bit more.
Regarding rear drilled rotor cracking Pagid asks why we dont just run a 19f/29r combo vs 29f/14r.
The 19/29 would give the same relative braking differential but be more rotor friendly. Perhaps the initial bite etc is less but it is an interesting question.
Any Pagid 19f/29r users out there chime in because I may be running OEM, Cup or Moptorsort rotors on the rear, whatever the heck the difference really is for the forseeable future.
I know not all of this is earth shattering knews guys but an update on the original post.
Dennis
Old 06-23-2010, 05:55 PM
  #18  
TrackDays247.com
Former Vendor
 
TrackDays247.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 4,299
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Slotted rear GiroDiscs. Not cheapo rotors, but the right way to do it.
Old 06-23-2010, 06:50 PM
  #19  
ninerguru
Racer
 
ninerguru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

One thing I noticed when I got the 997Cup rotors (350mm- pccb replacement) was that the width of the e-brake "drum" was less than the OEM. It actually allows more air to flow internally by exposing the fins and probably makes them lighter. Looks like it only covers 1/2 the brake shoes but does not seem to affect the e-brake. Lou
Old 06-23-2010, 08:01 PM
  #20  
SH || NC
Drifting
 
SH || NC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 3,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dennis, thanks for the update/feedback.



Quick Reply: Another brake question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:36 AM.