Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

997 GT3 to get PSM!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2005, 08:37 PM
  #46  
JS
Race Car
 
JS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 4,527
Likes: 0
Received 536 Likes on 351 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MetalSolid
Watt, I can't see Porsche bringing that car here - DOT won't certify cars with exposed roll cages.

TOW Z meet?
They bring it in just like Ferrari brought in the 360 CS.
Old 10-21-2005, 12:02 AM
  #47  
CodeRed
Rennlist Member
 
CodeRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa monica
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Noel-Good thread BTW.
Old 10-21-2005, 01:43 AM
  #48  
MJSpeed
The Rebel
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
MJSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 5,390
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JASCLASS
They bring it in just like Ferrari brought in the 360 CS.
Great point.

Also if I recall correctly Top Gear's challenge between the two (360 CS v. GT3 RS) made a huge point about the P-Car having 0 electronic enhancements and how the F-Car was full of them.

My guess is that the 997 GT3 will be closer to the 360 CS than the 996 GT3 RS which in my book that would not be a bad thing. My understanding that on not so perfect road the 360 CS was on a different playing field than both versions of the 996 GT3.

And it some how IMHO would not lose it's appeal at all.
Old 10-21-2005, 02:08 AM
  #49  
MetalSolid
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
MetalSolid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JASCLASS
They bring it in just like Ferrari brought in the 360 CS.
Does the Euro 360 CS have a cage, what are the differences over a regular 360? I know the 997GT3RS wouldn't be an RS without a welded in cage - maybe a Ruf-type cage.

Rich.
Old 10-21-2005, 02:08 AM
  #50  
Cupcar#12
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Cupcar#12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a correctly calibrated system would be good (defeatable of course)
for instance the ABS in my cup car is very different than the street version (faster pulses) as allows full use on the track while in my other 964 i would defeat ABS on the track as it's threshold was too high and increased stopping distances.
we tested both on the cup (abs on/off) and there was about a 7% (shorter disti) gain with abs as opposed to it defeated - plus you could hit a dash mounted switch and disable it.
i am not intending to get into the propper breaking method discussion here guys - that has been beat to death already)
btw the 92 Turbo LeMans was equiped with a racing abs system even faster acting than the cups (the RSR did not have ABS) - this was the most expensive single control unit ever offered by Porsche.
Me i'm looking forward to a used 996 GT-3 soon
Old 10-21-2005, 05:37 AM
  #51  
sergini
Instructor
 
sergini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bologna, Italy
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow!
Old 10-21-2005, 11:05 AM
  #52  
Sun Ra
Drifting
 
Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Way Back In, New Zealand
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MetalSolid
Does the Euro 360 CS have a cage, what are the differences over a regular 360? I know the 997GT3RS wouldn't be an RS without a welded in cage - maybe a Ruf-type cage.

Rich.
it has rollbar mounting points, which are omitted from US model, making it $$$ to install here. rollbar and 4 points can be ordered, not in USA

also no cat.s so car is 100+ # lighter


i dont want a cage for street use, just the lightest weight car they make
Old 10-21-2005, 04:06 PM
  #53  
MetalSolid
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
MetalSolid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MJSpeed
My guess is that the 997 GT3 will be closer to the 360 CS than the 996 GT3 RS which in my book that would not be a bad thing.
The fact that Porsche never bought the 997 Performance Chassis option to the US is an indication of what the 997 GT3 will be like, and that there will be no GT3RS here.
Old 10-21-2005, 04:20 PM
  #54  
MJSpeed
The Rebel
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
MJSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 5,390
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MetalSolid
The fact that Porsche never bought the 997 Performance Chassis option to the US is an indication of what the 997 GT3 will be like, and that there will be no GT3RS here.

This point is interesting but it makes an assumption that proved to be erroneous with Porsche's recent history. The 996 was never offered in the US with the MO30 ROW suspension and yet they brought the GT3 with it's "real" suspension.

I guess we're both making assumptions.

We'll just have to wait and see what zee boys un Stuttgart decide to do.
Old 10-21-2005, 05:04 PM
  #55  
MetalSolid
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
MetalSolid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MJSpeed
This point is interesting but it makes an assumption that proved to be erroneous with Porsche's recent history. The 996 was never offered in the US with the MO30 ROW suspension and yet they brought the GT3 with it's "real" suspension.
I believe we're saying the same thing; using recent Porsche history my asumption is you can use the suspension options they've omitted from the US market to gauge what the next GT3 will be like. Had Porsche brought the 997 Performance Chassis to the States we could have expected an even more hardcore version of the 997GT3 - maybe even the RS. The 997 Performance Chassis is better than the 996 X74, so my assumption is we can expect the next GT3 to be better by that amount (with PASM on sport).



Quick Reply: 997 GT3 to get PSM!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:28 PM.