Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Cam deviation -7.9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Yesterday, 03:40 PM
  #16  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,033
Received 1,775 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Default

^^ This
The following users liked this post:
kancell10 (Yesterday)
Old Yesterday, 03:42 PM
  #17  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,033
Received 1,775 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Default

I think the IMS tensioner / chain ramp is the one that cannot be replaced without splitting the case on the 5-chain engine, correct?
Old Yesterday, 04:06 PM
  #18  
sublm8
Rennlist Member
 
sublm8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 291
Received 192 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Murphy
I think the IMS tensioner / chain ramp is the one that cannot be replaced without splitting the case on the 5-chain engine, correct?
correct. Other large chain ramps can be replaced, however I question the utility of this as I and other owners have been able to get back to spec without replacing these. They don’t appear to impact cam deviation and they are quite large and unlikely to wear through, at least based on my research and observation. On my engine there was some wear but none of the visible pitting that affects the small cam chain pads.

Last edited by sublm8; Yesterday at 04:07 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by sublm8:
996love (Yesterday), kancell10 (Yesterday)
Old Yesterday, 04:07 PM
  #19  
Viper1000
Rennlist Member
 
Viper1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Hockley TX
Posts: 931
Received 234 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sublm8
correct. Other large chain ramps can be replaced, however I question the utility of this as I and other owners have been able to get back to spec without replacing these. They don’t appear to impact cam deviation and they are quite large and unlikely to wear through, at least based on my research and observation.

Sorry for the stupid question but then why do they fall apart? Is it a different one?
Old Yesterday, 04:20 PM
  #20  
sublm8
Rennlist Member
 
sublm8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 291
Received 192 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Viper1000
Sorry for the stupid question but then why do they fall apart? Is it a different one?
They just wear over time. You’ll see the center groove. When you look at them side-by-side w the cam pads you can see how much larger the surface area is and how the wear pattern is different as a result.

The four cam pads pit as they are smaller and under dynamic tension as the variocam actuator does its thing. Theory that the original material was inferior and new pads are better, unsure how accurate that is.

also you can’t visualize the IMS chain pads, so those I can’t speak to, but as noted there’s no way to access anyway. They are smaller and potentially a debris source. Nothing a mortal can do anything about without $$$.




Last edited by sublm8; Yesterday at 04:25 PM.
Old Yesterday, 04:22 PM
  #21  
De Jeeper
Nordschleife Master
 
De Jeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Delaware
Posts: 5,897
Received 3,508 Likes on 1,849 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Viper1000
Sorry for the stupid question but then why do they fall apart? Is it a different one?

Those longer guides for the long chains and ims chain r a guide for the chain slack to ride against. The chain tensioners keep the chains tight. On the 2 small chains, variocam (can timing) the pads on the actuators push on the chain itself to create tension. This is why they wear faster and chunk.



Quick Reply: Cam deviation -7.9



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:39 PM.