2005 996 C4S Bore Scoring and rebuild info
#31
Drifting
Thread Starter
No engine expert here but I don't believe that is a chunk missing. The engine was running when sent in. I think Jake would have called if he had found an exploded cylinder liner. Regardless the liners get machined out anyway.
The following users liked this post:
Mpfaff (10-15-2019)
#32
Former Vendor
This build is coming along well, and as scheduled. We edited more video this past week, and will get it scheduled to be released on the channel.
The following users liked this post:
Mpfaff (07-08-2019)
The following users liked this post:
spud72 (10-15-2019)
#34
Drifting
Thread Starter
Some feedback I received: #6 was horribly scored, #5 almost horrible, and #4 just starting. All of that can clearly be seen in the above video. Bore scoring is replacing the IMSB problem but on steroids! I don't wish to sound like an alarmist but if you have one of these cars pay attention to proper recommended maintenance activities/procedures, the engine sounds, tailpipe appearance and oil consumption. The sky is Not falling but information is power so my advice is to soak up as much as possible.
The following users liked this post:
jobyt (07-12-2019)
#35
Burning Brakes
[QUOTE=wildbilly32;15959873I don't wish to sound like an alarmist but if you have one of these cars pay attention to proper recommended maintenance activities/procedures, the engine sounds, tailpipe appearance and oil consumption. The sky is Not falling but information is power so my advice is to soak up as much as possible.[/QUOTE]
From what I understand;
Use a good motor oil
Drive off immediately after cold start, keeping rpms at or below 3k until operating temps are reached.
After that, what more can you do?
Thanks for your thread! Very informative! And very jealous of your new motor. 😎
From what I understand;
Use a good motor oil
Drive off immediately after cold start, keeping rpms at or below 3k until operating temps are reached.
After that, what more can you do?
Thanks for your thread! Very informative! And very jealous of your new motor. 😎
The following users liked this post:
BlackSlacks (10-26-2019)
#36
Drifting
Thread Starter
Disclaimer time(again): I do not work for F6I. I do not have a financial interest in F6I. I am paying for my engine work. I choose F6I from what I read over a period of years and from talking to Jake. They are the best...in my opinion. I am happy to share this journey with the goal of helping people understand the issue. I am excitingly waiting for the return of my car!!
The following users liked this post:
2005 996 C4S (09-12-2022)
#37
Flat 6 rules!!!!!
I shipped my 2004 Boxster s to Jake and he installed his IMS Solution and a lot of other upgrades for me. I've put 35,000 miles on her since then and it has all been pure joy.
#39
Former Vendor
One good thing about the 986 Boxster- they simply do not score bores!
#40
Rennlist Member
#42
Former Vendor
These engines do not use forged pistons, lack ferrostan piston coating, and have more open running clearances. They also have better stroke/ bore ratios, as well as rod/ stroke ratios, and a slew of other benefits.
#43
Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations;[url=tel:15965243
15965243[/url]]These engines do not use forged pistons, lack ferrostan piston coating, and have more open running clearances. They also have better stroke/ bore ratios, as well as rod/ stroke ratios, and a slew of other benefits.
#44
Former Vendor
So the Boxster motors did not use forged pistons but the 911 did?!? Does it just go by the displacement of the motor? I know you show a number of variables but is the displacement a common denominator? I’ve watched the ‘bore scoring’ series (great stuff), just thought still trying to figure out which motors/years/models were best to AVOID this issue. Thank you for weighing in! -Dom
its not a displacement issue, it’s an engine designation issue. There’s 17 engine designations in the M9X engine family.
Basically any 986 is safe from bore scoring, as well as any 987 base (2.7) or Boxster S 987 from 2005 and 2006, with M96.25 and M96.26 engine designations.
The following users liked this post:
I am the Walrus (07-12-2019)
#45
The Boxster never shared the displacement of the 911, until 2007 when it became a 3.4 engine, when the Boxster S got the M97.21 Cayman S Engine. The 07 and 08 Boxster are the only Boxster engines that are scored bores.
its not a displacement issue, it’s an engine designation issue. There’s 17 engine designations in the M9X engine family.
Basically any 986 is safe from bore scoring, as well as any 987 base (2.7) or Boxster S 987 from 2005 and 2006, with M96.25 and M96.26 engine designations.
its not a displacement issue, it’s an engine designation issue. There’s 17 engine designations in the M9X engine family.
Basically any 986 is safe from bore scoring, as well as any 987 base (2.7) or Boxster S 987 from 2005 and 2006, with M96.25 and M96.26 engine designations.