Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

MAF value = Horsepower potential

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2019, 12:43 AM
  #76  
sweet victory
Three Wheelin'
 
sweet victory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,381
Received 203 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

221.25g/s. I forgot to log RPM. Doh! Odometer must've been at like ~6900 RPM before I changed gears.
Old 03-06-2019, 12:50 AM
  #77  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,060
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sweet victory
221.25g/s. I forgot to log RPM. Doh! Odometer must've been at like ~6900 RPM before I changed gears.
lol...What engine do you have? Don't forget to get all the other data, IAT, altitude, humidity ect...
Old 03-06-2019, 12:57 AM
  #78  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,060
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bplein
Well there's a bit of that aspect to it, but it's also practical. Let's say you baseline your car. Now you make a change. You want to know how much of that change (different MAF values) was due to the change vs. the fact that yesterday it was 40F and 10% humidty and today it was 60F and 40% humidity.

This is about putting some science down that we can all do without renting dyno time. Poor man's dyno.
This is true, but the advantage over renting Dyno time, is that I drive every day and this is right at my fingertips. I always end up taking it to redline at some point during my drive. So the more Data you log, the better your base-line, and the better you can evaluate changes..

Also look at my IAT temps, cool air, you wont get that on the Dyno !!! I think that is one reason our cars do poorly on the Dyno..
Old 03-06-2019, 01:21 AM
  #79  
sweet victory
Three Wheelin'
 
sweet victory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,381
Received 203 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
lol...What engine do you have? Don't forget to get all the other data, IAT, altitude, humidity ect...
3.4L

I'm using Bluedriver. I don't think I can monitor altitude and humidity. Using a weather app, it's 58F and 85% humidity. Basically sea level since I was on Pacific Coast Hwy.
Old 03-06-2019, 01:32 AM
  #80  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,060
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sweet victory
3.4L

I'm using Bluedriver. I don't think I can monitor altitude and humidity. Using a weather app, it's 58F and 85% humidity. Basically sea level since I was on Pacific Coast Hwy.
OK cool, I was going to say, if you are using an Android, most Android phone you can get altitude and Baro from the GPS, or download an app for them..

BTW, how many miles on your 3.4? Any mods?
EDIT : I see your Mod list above, but mileage?

Last edited by Porschetech3; 03-06-2019 at 01:52 AM.
Old 03-06-2019, 09:44 PM
  #81  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,714
Received 1,580 Likes on 987 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ahsai
Did another pull today and got the same max MAF reading 241.5g/s so it' quite consistent. Per Porschtech3's computation 241.5/0.75 = 322 hp. Right on?!

2003 Porsche 996 C2 manual
Coolant temp: 174 F
rpm: 6702
IAT: 96.8 F
MAF: 241.5 g/s
mph: 63.4 mph
VE: 102%
I’m guessing everyone’s figures won’t take into account all sorts of losses, such as oil pump, accessories, etc.? I mean the actual HP an engine produces is probably higher than what can be measured at the crankshaft unless these accessories are included in the crank-based dynamometer.

But our numbers are airflow with fuel delivered, so won’t our calculated/measured numbers going to be higher than what a dyno would measure? I’m not talking about transmission and diff/driveline losses, just other engine losses like crankshaft, piston ring friction, crankcase pressures, camshaft chains, valves and valve springs, etc.??
Old 03-06-2019, 10:19 PM
  #82  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,060
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by murphyslaw1978


I’m guessing everyone’s figures won’t take into account all sorts of losses, such as oil pump, accessories, etc.? I mean the actual HP an engine produces is probably higher than what can be measured at the crankshaft unless these accessories are included in the crank-based dynamometer.

But our numbers are airflow with fuel delivered, so won’t our calculated/measured numbers going to be higher than what a dyno would measure? I’m not talking about transmission and diff/driveline losses, just other engine losses like crankshaft, piston ring friction, crankcase pressures, camshaft chains, valves and valve springs, etc.??
You are absolutely correct, our measured numbers are for absolute power with no losses. No losses from alternator, power steering, water pump, friction, drivetrain ect. We should probably come up with a new name for it since it is a new way of measuring power/potential out of the many ways that already exist. Here is a link to an article on some of the ways horsepower is calculated/corrected. https://www.dynomitedynamometer.com/...horsepower.htm
Old 03-07-2019, 02:56 PM
  #83  
sweet victory
Three Wheelin'
 
sweet victory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,381
Received 203 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
OK cool, I was going to say, if you are using an Android, most Android phone you can get altitude and Baro from the GPS, or download an app for them..

BTW, how many miles on your 3.4? Any mods?
EDIT : I see your Mod list above, but mileage?
I'm not sure of exact mileage. The Porsche dealer put in a re manufactured motor in late 08/ early 09. Roughly 70k miles
Old 03-09-2019, 01:46 AM
  #84  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,060
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ahsai

BTW, sadly Durametric can only read the MAF value (or any sensor value) at ~10 times per second (best case). The Torque pro probably reads the MAF much less frequently than that. especially if you log other PIDs at the same time too.

.
My sample rate for my setup is 5 times per second for the ELM327 and Torque Pro, but I'm monitoring MAF.IAT, fuel trim long and short, 02 sensors, coolant temp, throttle position, timing, all on different flip through screens. 5 times per second seems to be enough to be consistent if doing a 3rd gear pull, may not be fast enough for a 1st or 2nd gear pull.
Old 03-09-2019, 03:34 AM
  #85  
Ahsai
Nordschleife Master
 
Ahsai's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,328
Received 62 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
My sample rate for my setup is 5 times per second for the ELM327 and Torque Pro, but I'm monitoring MAF.IAT, fuel trim long and short, 02 sensors, coolant temp, throttle position, timing, all on different flip through screens. 5 times per second seems to be enough to be consistent if doing a 3rd gear pull, may not be fast enough for a 1st or 2nd gear pull.
Yeah, mine is not much faster. Mine does 6~8 PIDs per second so when I monitor 6~8 PIDs, on average each will update only about once per second, which is quite slow.
BTW, I think the way Torque Pro works is it only queries for the PIDs that are relevant to the current screen you're on so the fact that you have other PIDs on other screens should not slow it down.
If you turn on logging for the run, you will see the log spits out about 10 rows per second. Each row will have the readings of all the PIDs you selected but then their values change at most once a second even though you know they change constantly in reality (e.g. rpm during a pull).
Old 03-10-2019, 03:37 PM
  #86  
02Z06
Racer
 
02Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 274
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Logged a quick run with my foxwell today. Outside temp is 62, local elevation is just under 600 ft. Quick 2nd gear run had .46lb/s at an IAT of 75. In grams that's about 208. Car is a 2000 C2 6 speed with IPD competition plenum and tb, AWE headers, speedtech mufflers, catless X-pipe. I'm going to try a 3rd gear pull and see what that nets.
Old 03-10-2019, 03:51 PM
  #87  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,060
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02Z06
Logged a quick run with my foxwell today. Outside temp is 62, local elevation is just under 600 ft. Quick 2nd gear run had .46lb/s at an IAT of 75. In grams that's about 208. Car is a 2000 C2 6 speed with IPD competition plenum and tb, AWE headers, speedtech mufflers, catless X-pipe. I'm going to try a 3rd gear pull and see what that nets.
NIce, thanks..
Old 03-10-2019, 04:42 PM
  #88  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,714
Received 1,580 Likes on 987 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
You are absolutely correct, our measured numbers are for absolute power with no losses. No losses from alternator, power steering, water pump, friction, drivetrain ect. We should probably come up with a new name for it since it is a new way of measuring power/potential out of the many ways that already exist. Here is a link to an article on some of the ways horsepower is calculated/corrected. https://www.dynomitedynamometer.com/...horsepower.htm
It’s a lot closer to GROSS than anything else. I’m guessing there isn’t much more than 20-25 HP to run the accessories and internal engine components (assuming AC is off)?
Old 03-11-2019, 07:15 PM
  #89  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,060
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by murphyslaw1978


It’s a lot closer to GROSS than anything else. I’m guessing there isn’t much more than 20-25 HP to run the accessories and internal engine components (assuming AC is off)?
Correct again, this method of measuring is more closely related to GROSS HORSEPOWER (mechanical horsepower not metric horsepower), but should be given a different name like Mhp or Mhpp (Motorsports Horsepower) or ( Motorsports Horsepower Potential), what y'all think?

The expected change in air flow from bolt-ons would be 7.5 g/s per 10Mhp.

With over 5k views there seems to be enough interest, just need to put out a little effort to help the community. Don't be concerned to take the engine to redline, if it can't go to redline it isn't healthy anyway.

Last edited by Porschetech3; 03-11-2019 at 07:30 PM.
Old 03-12-2019, 11:03 AM
  #90  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by murphyslaw1978
.........and internal engine components.......
Internal like cams and pistons?


Quick Reply: MAF value = Horsepower potential



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:14 AM.