Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Scared of IMS and RMS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2018, 04:02 AM
  #1  
cssource123
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
cssource123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb Scared of IMS and RMS

Recently bought a 996 with 80k miles. Owner took beautiful care of the car and serviced it all the way until he passed away. He had the LN bearing and RMS work done 10k miles before so at 70k. He also had a lot of other parts re-done with receipt and proof. I heard that LN bearings are still prone to fail so should I be scared? Need some feedback thats all! Thanks. Also any recommended warranties in the SoCal area?
Old 12-07-2018, 05:27 AM
  #2  
Ratchet1025
Rennlist Member
 
Ratchet1025's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,129
Received 224 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cssource123
Recently bought a 996 with 80k miles. Owner took beautiful care of the car and serviced it all the way until he passed away. He had the LN bearing and RMS work done 10k miles before so at 70k. He also had a lot of other parts re-done with receipt and proof. I heard that LN bearings are still prone to fail so should I be scared? Need some feedback thats all! Thanks. Also any recommended warranties in the SoCal area?
There are many others with far more knowledge than mine, they will probably chime in soon. Please do not think the LN bearings are "prone to fail", that is not correct. Depending on the bearing, they have service intervals like any other part. Please confirm which bearing you have and contact LN directly, they are happy to help. You should not need to worry about the RMS for many more years. Take a deep breath, do some research and enjoy driving your car. Post pictures and enjoy the RL community.
Old 12-07-2018, 09:20 AM
  #3  
NuttyProfessor
Three Wheelin'
 
NuttyProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,968
Received 218 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cssource123
Recently bought a 996 with 80k miles. Owner took beautiful care of the car and serviced it all the way until he passed away. He had the LN bearing and RMS work done 10k miles before so at 70k. He also had a lot of other parts re-done with receipt and proof. I heard that LN bearings are still prone to fail so should I be scared? Need some feedback thats all! Thanks. Also any recommended warranties in the SoCal area?
I echo Ratchet's thoughts on this matter. I think what you're asking of the 996 community is more reassurance than just feedback. IMHO, the previous owner made the right choice for the bearing swap, but I wouldn't say they are "failure prone", unless the PO had the IMS Solution installed, then there will be a service interval. Please refer to this guide from LN engineering -

http://imsretrofit.com/service-intervals/

Sounds like you have a well cared for 996. Go out and enjoy it! Don't let the internet hype steal your fun out of the car!
Old 12-07-2018, 09:30 AM
  #4  
JoeyCapranica
Instructor
 
JoeyCapranica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

From what I understand, the cause of IMSB failure is not so much the bearing as much as the runout on the intermediate shaft. If the intermediate shaft isn’t within runout tolerance, it won’t matter how many bearings you throw at it, it’ll just keep eating through them. There are ways to combat this, but only one sure fire fix: rebuild the engine with an updated intermediate shaft - this is the only real permanent solution; any bearing replacement, plain, ceramic ball bearing, or otherwise, is going to fail eventually when it’s at the end of a shaft with too much runout. It is unlikely that your engine has an intermediate shaft that is out of tolerance, especially now that the cars are as old as they are.

It is recommended by some that you install a magnetic oil drain plug and conduct regular and frequent oil analyses to monitor the IMSB wear and replace it when signs of its imminent failure present themselves; this becomes part of the regular scheduled maintenance and is ongoing, but seems superfluous if the IMS is within runout tolerance.

Again, if the shaft isn’t within runout tolerance, no matter the bearing, it’s going to have catastrophic failure eventually and inevitably. Replacing the IMSB as a preventative measure is a temporary and ongoing solution. That said, the replacement frequency would vary with the severity of the shaft runout and the resiliency of the bearing. One could conceivably be replacing bearings in as little as 10k miles or as many as 50k miles.

So, long story short, if your intermediate shaft isn’t within runout tolerance, your engine is going to have to come apart eventually - from catastrophic failure or as a preventative measure. Intermediate shaft bearing wear is a tell tale sign of shaft runout and your options are to replace the IMS and fix it (probably) for good, or to replace the IMSB with as much frequency as is necessary for your peace of mind.

This is my understanding from reading the available information online from several sources and coming to my own conclusions. I have a mechanical background; I’ve been trained to and have serviced and repaired various aerial and ground vehicles, civilian and military. I have a decent grasp of how things work from a practical perspective, however I am not a trained engineer, nor do I have any hands-on mechanical experience with any Porsche.
Old 12-07-2018, 10:45 AM
  #5  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,054
Received 805 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

3-4K mile oil changes, cut open and check your filters and drive it like you stole it. Keep the RPM's up above 3K and enjoy you car...
Old 12-07-2018, 10:57 AM
  #6  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,447
Received 1,070 Likes on 556 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyCapranica
From what I understand, the cause of IMSB failure is not so much the bearing as much as the runout on the intermediate shaft. If the intermediate shaft isn’t within runout tolerance, it won’t matter how many bearings you throw at it, it’ll just keep eating through them. There are ways to combat this, but only one sure fire fix: rebuild the engine with an updated intermediate shaft - this is the only real permanent solution; any bearing replacement, plain, ceramic ball bearing, or otherwise, is going to fail eventually when it’s at the end of a shaft with too much runout. It is unlikely that your engine has an intermediate shaft that is out of tolerance, especially now that the cars are as old as they are.

It is recommended by some that you install a magnetic oil drain plug and conduct regular and frequent oil analyses to monitor the IMSB wear and replace it when signs of its imminent failure present themselves; this becomes part of the regular scheduled maintenance and is ongoing, but seems superfluous if the IMS is within runout tolerance.

Again, if the shaft isn’t within runout tolerance, no matter the bearing, it’s going to have catastrophic failure eventually and inevitably. Replacing the IMSB as a preventative measure is a temporary and ongoing solution. That said, the replacement frequency would vary with the severity of the shaft runout and the resiliency of the bearing. One could conceivably be replacing bearings in as little as 10k miles or as many as 50k miles.

So, long story short, if your intermediate shaft isn’t within runout tolerance, your engine is going to have to come apart eventually - from catastrophic failure or as a preventative measure. Intermediate shaft bearing wear is a tell tale sign of shaft runout and your options are to replace the IMS and fix it (probably) for good, or to replace the IMSB with as much frequency as is necessary for your peace of mind.

This is my understanding from reading the available information online from several sources and coming to my own conclusions. I have a mechanical background; I’ve been trained to and have serviced and repaired various aerial and ground vehicles, civilian and military. I have a decent grasp of how things work from a practical perspective, however I am not a trained engineer, nor do I have any hands-on mechanical experience with any Porsche.
Runout of the IMS shafts is one of many issues with the intermediate shaft, but not the only one or the ultimate root cause. We rebuild hundreds of shafts a year and check every single one for runout. New shafts can have up to about .005" of runout from the factory and is our "wear limit" when checking shafts. If it has more than .005", we advise running an IMS Solution as it doesn't care. The part is running on a film of oil and the slight runout won't affect the IMS Solution. We'll run a solution without any concern even with .010" of runout and have for years.

Problem is you can't quantify the runout without engine disassembly, so you just have to assume your shaft is good. The only thing I can guarantee you is that if you have a catastrophic bearing failures, that failure will damage the shaft, resulting in excessive runout.

Waiting until a bearing failure presents itself is too late for bearing replacement. At that point, FOD has being spread throughout the engine and collateral damage from debris is almost a given.

Although some people say otherwise, any roller or ball bearing will have a service interval. Any bearing manufacturer will tell you that.

The IMS Solution, being a plain bearing, is designed for the life of the engine (as long as you have oil in said engine).

Ultimately, there are those who are of the mindset that they don't need to change the bearing. It's a free world and everyone can make their own decision based on the available information. Just be sure you are getting your information from a verified source and that it's factual and not based solely on opinion.
Old 12-07-2018, 11:47 AM
  #7  
User 63031
Instructor
 
User 63031's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 203
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

At that point, FOD has being spread throughout the engine and collateral damage from debris is almost a given.
This is being repeated time and again, but should you not add that this is the case only if your oil filter bypass spring was faulty? And what is the actual failure percentage of that part? I highly doubt that it's "almost a given"-kind-of-high.
Old 12-07-2018, 11:48 AM
  #8  
JoeyCapranica
Instructor
 
JoeyCapranica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Charles Navarro
Runout of the IMS shafts is one of many issues with the intermediate shaft, but not the only one or the ultimate root cause. We rebuild hundreds of shafts a year and check every single one for runout. New shafts can have up to about .005" of runout from the factory and is our "wear limit" when checking shafts. If it has more than .005", we advise running an IMS Solution as it doesn't care. The part is running on a film of oil and the slight runout won't affect the IMS Solution. We'll run a solution without any concern even with .010" of runout and have for years.

Problem is you can't quantify the runout without engine disassembly, so you just have to assume your shaft is good. The only thing I can guarantee you is that if you have a catastrophic bearing failures, that failure will damage the shaft, resulting in excessive runout.

Waiting until a bearing failure presents itself is too late for bearing replacement. At that point, FOD has being spread throughout the engine and collateral damage from debris is almost a given.

Although some people say otherwise, any roller or ball bearing will have a service interval. Any bearing manufacturer will tell you that.

The IMS Solution, being a plain bearing, is designed for the life of the engine (as long as you have oil in said engine).

Ultimately, there are those who are of the mindset that they don't need to change the bearing. It's a free world and everyone can make their own decision based on the available information. Just be sure you are getting your information from a verified source and that it's factual and not based solely on opinion.
I was under the impression that the runout variance on the 996 M96 engines’ intermediate shafts was especially bad - is that impression inaccurate?

Personally, I plan to do the IMS Solution. I prefer the plain bearing, especially in that particular application. But I’m not going to do it until there is a reason to drop the engine and/or transmission. My car has 23k miles on it, so I’m hoping I have a lot of driving to do before I need to replace things. But when it comes time to replace something like an IMSB, I’d like to replace those parts with superior, better performing, longer-lasting units. That’s me, though. I’m sure monitoring one’s oil and replacing the IMSB as a scheduled maintenance item works just fine for most folks.
Old 12-07-2018, 12:04 PM
  #9  
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cleveland Georgia
Posts: 6,968
Received 2,282 Likes on 899 Posts
Default

IMSB Failure is a “sum” of all sorts of variables that create the equation. Every failure is a result of at least two things working to create a less than favorable equation.

Everyone wants to pinpoint one certain thing that creates the failure. Sorry- that doesn’t happen.
Old 12-07-2018, 12:08 PM
  #10  
steam_mill
Burning Brakes
 
steam_mill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 970
Received 279 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

I did so much reading on this matter prior to purchase. You can look at my threads. I factored in the bearing update with the IMS solution into the cost of the car. It wasn't cheap. It is only a waste of money if I write off the car. I had a hefty bill for the IMS solution. I figure if I sell the car tomorrow, I would probably recoup a portion of it. I have no plans on selling it. I thought long and hard about a 996 vs. 997.1 vs 997.2:

996: Included the cost of the IMS update in cost of the car. Nicer interior IMHO than the 997.1. I hated the number pad for the phone and useless NAV. No one uses NAV anymore. Your phone will always have better NAV than your car.

997.1: Did not like the phone pad, silver paint, bad HVAC buttons. No spare tire. About the same cost as a 996 once I did the IMS solution. Yes, I preferred these headlights.

997.2: Seriously considered it. Long term (10 years), I think this car would cost me much more $$$$ overall than the 996. I think the driving experience (not speed) is more fun in 996. No spare tire pushed me over.

**** Spare tire and why I care: Years ago, I upgraded the brakes on my mustang. Didn't check the spare to see if it fit. Realized 5 years later that it didn't fit and updated the spare. All I could think of was being at the side of the road with my wife and dog. My wife turning to me and saying: "Really the spare doesn't fit?" Fast forward, driving a car without a spare. I can't get my head around blowing a tire on a Saturday, 500 miles from home. Having to wait until Monday to MAYBE find a 285/30/18 in some small town. At least the spare will get me either to a city or somewhere closer to home. I'm also in Canada. Let's just say retail is horrible here and I could see waiting days for a replacement.
Old 12-07-2018, 12:13 PM
  #11  
cssource123
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
cssource123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I do have the receipt of the LN bearing change but I don't know if it was the IMS Solution or the other types of LN bearings. I will give them a call and ask what the owner put in. It was put in in 2013 so I am not sure if they had the IMS Solution at the time. To keep it noted, I will change my oil every 3-4k miles?
Old 12-07-2018, 12:36 PM
  #12  
cssource123
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
cssource123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is there anyone in the SoCal area that can recommend me a warranty company that will cover IMS and RMS issues. I would rather pay to have a good piece of mind while driving this beauty.
Old 12-07-2018, 12:47 PM
  #13  
NuttyProfessor
Three Wheelin'
 
NuttyProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,968
Received 218 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cssource123
I do have the receipt of the LN bearing change but I don't know if it was the IMS Solution or the other types of LN bearings.
Jake Raby and the Knowledge group started a YouTube channel called "Rennvision". There are a lot of great videos that show you whats in the IMS bearing kits sold by LN Engineering. If you're interested in the IMS solution, watch their pre-qualification and installation videos they posted last month. Below are the links.



Jake Raby also contributed to PCA on the topics related to OEM IMS bearings and failure stages. Very informative stuff. Check it out...


Old 12-07-2018, 01:40 PM
  #14  
porschedog
Rennlist Member
 
porschedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hollywood, Florida
Posts: 5,634
Received 313 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

I too was scared. I stayed awake nights worrying that my '03 C2s IMS might go kablooey. So, I proactively replaced the OEM IMS in my 996. I enjoyed blissful peace of mind for 7 months until the "upgrade" went kablooey.
Indy and supplier both said, "that's not my fault, but we wil happily sell/install a replacement at full price and maybe muck up the car while it's in the shop"
I had the engine rebuilt - elsewhere - and it's back on the road again. I was sorely tempted to firebomb the indy that did the upgrade, but I satisfied my desire for retribution by paying a shaman to make sure he dies of eye, kidney, liver and testicular cancer.

Moral of story: Our cars are not invincible but they are fun. If something goes bang, fix it and move on. It is still waaaaay better than driving an incredibly reliable soul-sucking Toyota.
Old 12-07-2018, 01:53 PM
  #15  
cssource123
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
cssource123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks . The previous owner put about 10k miles on the new LN bearing that he put on before he passed away. I think I should just drive the car and worry less. The car is a beauty and maintained well. Ill probably change the oil every 4k miles just to make sure things are on top.


Quick Reply: Scared of IMS and RMS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:32 PM.