Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Crank carrier part numbers? Difference?

Old 09-06-2017, 01:05 PM
  #1  
Mark Henry
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Mark Henry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Port Hope, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Crank carrier part numbers? Difference?

I have an engine that had the good old thrust failure, it has damage on the carrier in the thrust area. I believe I could press it back into service, but at this point if I can just replace it I will.
1996 C2 3.4, 5 chain.

I have a line on a carrier but the part numbers on the casting are wrong.

The original engine carrier part numbers are 996 101 111 3R and 996 101 112 3R

The carrier I'm looking at are 996 101 157 2R and 996 101 158 2R

I have another carrier from a 2004 C4S with 996 101 157 3R and 996 101 158 3R
I'd have to fully spec it out, but the width of the carrier is the same as the original out of the '99 C2.
I can't use this one as it belongs to someone else.

Does anyone know why the difference in part numbers?
Old 09-07-2017, 09:10 AM
  #2  
Mark Henry
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Mark Henry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Port Hope, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Measuring the 3.6 996 101 157 2R carrier found the crank journals/saddles (3.6) are much larger.
I don't know if the 2R and 3R makes the difference, or the seller of the 2R carrier just doesn't know what car the carrier is out of. I've asked this seller to measure the journals.

Last edited by Mark Henry; 09-07-2017 at 10:39 AM.
Old 09-08-2017, 12:04 PM
  #3  
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cleveland Georgia
Posts: 6,968
Received 2,282 Likes on 899 Posts
Default

The 3.6 and even the later 3.4 (987c) engines have
Larger main bearing diameters.

You need a carrier from a 3.4 M96.01,.02, .04 engine code for the 996 application. Box Ster S uses the same carrier in the M96.21 & M96.24 engine, and Boxster base uses it in the M96.22
Old 09-08-2017, 01:44 PM
  #4  
Mark Henry
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Mark Henry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Port Hope, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks Jake.
For the 3.4 is there a date they started with the larger journals or is this a typical *****-nilly middle of production change?
Old 09-09-2017, 07:33 PM
  #5  
Noz1974
Burning Brakes
 
Noz1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

I've got one but I'm in uk!
Old 09-10-2017, 11:11 AM
  #6  
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cleveland Georgia
Posts: 6,968
Received 2,282 Likes on 899 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Henry
Thanks Jake.
For the 3.4 is there a date they started with the larger journals or is this a typical *****-nilly middle of production change?
Yes, the 9x7 3.4 has the larger journals, the same as a 3.6L. These started with the 2006 Cayman S, and 2007 Boxster S (M97.21)
Old 09-10-2017, 01:16 PM
  #7  
DBJoe996
Rennlist Member
 
DBJoe996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 0
Received 1,085 Likes on 697 Posts
Default

Jake - thank you for sharing your knowledge! And, we are sending a hurricane to you. Watch out.....


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Crank carrier part numbers? Difference?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:16 PM.