Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

ROW M030 vs B6 HD with stock springs etc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2017, 09:40 PM
  #1  
lexvortex
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
lexvortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ROW M030 vs B6 HD with stock springs etc

Hi,

I'm looking into upgrading my stock factory suspension in my 2001 C4 mt6, my car has just over 100k miles and the suspension is soft and the rear struts need to be replaced because they are two different types (B4 on left and B6 on right) from an accident repair. The less I spend the better, as I blew the budget on the engine and transmission (clutch, flywheel, IMS soln, etc). So far I have three options each more expensive but theoretically better than the next. It is my daily driver and I plan to do a little bit of autox and maybe a track day or two a year. I am new to the sport and 996's in general. I may have to replace the front shock mounts and bearing, although they seem fine for now.

1. upgrade from Bilstien B4 to B6 HD and keep everything else stock. --$800
2. ROW M030 -- $1550 from Carnewal
3. H&R road and track coil overs. -- $1895 from ECS tuning

What I would like to know is if the ROW M030 is worth the extra $750 over just the Bilstiens and if I'm willing to go with the ROW M030 then maybe its worth it to get the H&Rs for only $350 more. I do like that the ROW M030 lowers the car a bit and that it is a Porsche product, whereas the H&Rs would require a lot more setup which would probably cost more money (how much??) and might be too low even at the highest setting.

Thanks for the input,
Dave
Old 07-22-2017, 12:11 AM
  #2  
tokika
Instructor
 
tokika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Went from stock to RoW MO30 and I have been very happy. No experience with the other options listed.
Old 07-22-2017, 04:43 AM
  #3  
Volkert
Racer
 
Volkert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

If you spent money at least go for M030. I really like it and the ride is still comfortable. Most important IMHO is that it is a kit, not just coil overs.

Volkert
Old 07-22-2017, 11:50 AM
  #4  
dan_189
Race Car
 
dan_189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,747
Received 127 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

I have M030 fairly happy but would like it to be maybe 20cm lower, other than that its a great setup
Old 07-22-2017, 12:48 PM
  #5  
Volkert
Racer
 
Volkert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dan_189
I have M030 fairly happy but would like it to be maybe 20cm lower, other than that its a great setup
Djeez, 20cm! You are pushing it!!
Old 07-22-2017, 08:19 PM
  #6  
dan_189
Race Car
 
dan_189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,747
Received 127 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Volkert
Djeez, 20cm! You are pushing it!!
Haha, nice and subtle!
Old 07-23-2017, 03:30 PM
  #7  
lexvortex
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
lexvortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for sharing your experiences with the M030, that is the one I am leaning towards and it seems to be very popular here.

Has anybody here upgraded only the dampers to the Bilstien B6 HD series and left everything else stock? I'm curious to know how much of an improvement that would be compared to stock.
Old 07-23-2017, 03:44 PM
  #8  
993James993
Burning Brakes
 
993James993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Tire Rack has the H&R coilovers at lower prices. The clubsport version was under $1700 when I looked earlier this week. If you want to be able to adjust your ride height it might be worth the extra cost.
Old 07-23-2017, 04:10 PM
  #9  
moburki
Rennlist Member
 
moburki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 545
Received 44 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 993James993
Tire Rack has the H&R coilovers at lower prices. The clubsport version was under $1700 when I looked earlier this week. If you want to be able to adjust your ride height it might be worth the extra cost.
Very happy with row030. Don't forget with coils you're going to likely want sways also. The row kit comes with x74 sways. Very well balanced. Performed excellent on the track even with r compound tires. .02
Old 07-23-2017, 05:10 PM
  #10  
texcwa
Racer
 
texcwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Question, I too want to upgrade my suspension on my 04 C2. Due to driveway angle I need to minimize how much the car gets lowered. Has anyone measured the actual ride height difference between stock,ROE M030 and US version 030? Also, besides height, are there any other differences between the ROE and US versions?

Thanks
Old 07-23-2017, 05:30 PM
  #11  
dporto
Rennlist Member
 
dporto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: L.I. NY
Posts: 6,778
Received 1,154 Likes on 791 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by texcwa
Question, I too want to upgrade my suspension on my 04 C2. Due to driveway angle I need to minimize how much the car gets lowered. Has anyone measured the actual ride height difference between stock,ROE M030 and US version 030? Also, besides height, are there any other differences between the ROE and US versions?

Thanks
Fitstly, it's R.O.W (which stands for - rest of world - I.e. Everywhere but the USA... The R.O.W M030 suspension is supposedly about an inch lower than the US version which is the same as the standard suspension height due to US DOT laws. Some people that have installed the ROW M030 have gotten little to no drop according to them. M030 Sways are not The same as X74 sways afaik (although I haven't measured them so who knows...). The C4/C4s came with M030 sways
Old 07-23-2017, 05:40 PM
  #12  
Volkert
Racer
 
Volkert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Might want to look at the overview here:
https://books.google.nl/books?id=Raa...height&f=false
Old 07-23-2017, 05:56 PM
  #13  
moburki
Rennlist Member
 
moburki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 545
Received 44 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dporto
Fitstly, it's R.O.W (which stands for - rest of world - I.e. Everywhere but the USA... The R.O.W M030 suspension is supposedly about an inch lower than the US version which is the same as the standard suspension height due to US DOT laws. Some people that have installed the ROW M030 have gotten little to no drop according to them. M030 Sways are not The same as X74 sways afaik (although I haven't measured them so who knows...). The C4/C4s came with M030 sways
Definitely lower with row on mine. Unfortunately forgot to measure before it was up on stands. My driveway was also a consideration. Can only pull in forward before and after row. From the little research i did the bars are the same as x74. I'll see if i can find where i read that. Either way really flattened the car out. The ride quality for street is better than stock imho
Old 07-23-2017, 06:55 PM
  #14  
JimmyB
Rennlist Member
 
JimmyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: DC
Posts: 451
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I went from H&R springs / stock shocks to ROW M030 partly because on the H&Rs the car was too low to get into my parking garage at work. Loved the look of it on the H&Rs though (as in my sig pic), ROW M030 is definitely higher. I have floor-to-fender measurements somewhere pre-surgery; if I can find my tape measure I'll take some as it is now.
Old 08-16-2017, 04:46 PM
  #15  
numbah9
Advanced
 
numbah9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Waltham, MA
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Volkert
Might want to look at the overview here:
https://books.google.nl/books?id=Raa...height&f=false
That wouldn't load for me, but thankfully I bought Adrian's book!

Here is what it says:

Originally Posted by Adrian Streather
RoW option M030:

Lowers the standard (official) RoW front and rear ride height by up to 20mm (0.8in). The whole package includes:
  • Shorter, stiffer front and rear springs.
  • Re-valved slightly softer on the rebound, but stiffer on the compression Bilstein front struts.
  • Re-valved and stiffer on both the rebound and compression Bilstein rear shock absorbers.
  • 13mm (0.51in) shorter rear bump stop.
  • Stronger (stiffer) stabiliser (anti-roll) bars. 23.6 x 3.5mm (0.93 x 0.14in) on the front and 19.6 x 2.6mm (0.77 x 0.10in) on the rear.
  • Traction ontrol for the rear wheel drive models only.
  • 18 inch wheels which are described later in this chapter.

NOTE--
18 inch wheels are an optional part of the M030 package. They are not a mandatory requirement. Many 996s with 17 inch wheels have M030 installed.
I thought that was really interesting! Here's what he has to say about the US M030, just in case you're wondering:

Originally Posted by Adrian Streather
US market option M030:

Does not lower the front or rear ride height; The package includes:
  • Stiffer front and rear springs.
  • Re-vavled softer on the rebound and compression Bilstein front struts.
  • Re-valved and stiffer on the rebound and same as normal on the compression Bilstein rear shock absorbers.
  • Stronger (stiffer) stabiliser (anti-roll) bars. 23.6 x 3.5mm (0.93 x 0.14in) on the front and 19.6 x 2.6mm (0.77 x 0.10in) on the rear.
  • 18 inch wheels which are described later in this chapter.
  • Traction control for the rear wheel drive models only.

NOTE--
18 inch wheels are an optional part of the M030 package. They are not a mandatory requirement. Many 996s with 17 inch wheels have M030 installed.
The book also talks about the X73, X74 and X75 suspension options, which include setups for the Turbo/C4S/GT-2/C4 models. Towards the end of this section, it says this, which I haven't seen anywhere before:

Originally Posted by Adrian Streather
NOTE--
There is a 10mm (0.4in) allowable tolerance built into the lowering kit options. Officially RoW option M030 will lower a minimum of 10mm (0.4in) up to a maximum of 20mm (0.8in) front and rear.


Quick Reply: ROW M030 vs B6 HD with stock springs etc



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:51 AM.