clean '97 993 tt on ebay
01-21-2009, 10:21 AM
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: south FL
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-21-2009, 11:32 PM
#6
Advanced
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
01-22-2009, 01:41 AM
#8
The bid history looks bogus, but the car is immaculate. I'd say it's fairly in the upper ranges of Turbo prices for this mileage and if all the details can be validated and verified, surely it's worth well north of the initial $80K starting price. Things like listing the mileage as with a prefixal dollar sign makes me wonder. Still, at $95K, you're touching the bottom of the scruffy range of Turbo S prices and in such a depressed market, you might even find a decent Turbo S -- if you're the type to keep one of these cars and not drive it, then you're better off with the resale trajectory of throwing your money into an S. : )
Personally, I really like this car. The S polished wheels and calipers alone appeal. The seemingly immaculate cabin and engine bay are impressive in the photos. If the car in real life lives up to these pics, even if someone does pay $10K too much, they've got a helluva time capsule example. Me, I like 'em like that -- I can fix (and improve) the mechanicals, but if the chassis, body and cabin trim aren't up to snuff, there's no way to (affordably) wind back the hands of time.
Personally, I really like this car. The S polished wheels and calipers alone appeal. The seemingly immaculate cabin and engine bay are impressive in the photos. If the car in real life lives up to these pics, even if someone does pay $10K too much, they've got a helluva time capsule example. Me, I like 'em like that -- I can fix (and improve) the mechanicals, but if the chassis, body and cabin trim aren't up to snuff, there's no way to (affordably) wind back the hands of time.
01-22-2009, 09:51 AM
#10
Rennlist Member
The bid history looks bogus, but the car is immaculate. I'd say it's fairly in the upper ranges of Turbo prices for this mileage and if all the details can be validated and verified, surely it's worth well north of the initial $80K starting price. Things like listing the mileage as with a prefixal dollar sign makes me wonder. Still, at $95K, you're touching the bottom of the scruffy range of Turbo S prices and in such a depressed market, you might even find a decent Turbo S -- if you're the type to keep one of these cars and not drive it, then you're better off with the resale trajectory of throwing your money into an S. : )
Personally, I really like this car. The S polished wheels and calipers alone appeal. The seemingly immaculate cabin and engine bay are impressive in the photos. If the car in real life lives up to these pics, even if someone does pay $10K too much, they've got a helluva time capsule example. Me, I like 'em like that -- I can fix (and improve) the mechanicals, but if the chassis, body and cabin trim aren't up to snuff, there's no way to (affordably) wind back the hands of time.
Personally, I really like this car. The S polished wheels and calipers alone appeal. The seemingly immaculate cabin and engine bay are impressive in the photos. If the car in real life lives up to these pics, even if someone does pay $10K too much, they've got a helluva time capsule example. Me, I like 'em like that -- I can fix (and improve) the mechanicals, but if the chassis, body and cabin trim aren't up to snuff, there's no way to (affordably) wind back the hands of time.
I don't think the bids are real. There have been no bids that high on the Mashall Goldman car that has far lower miles. Why would someone be bidding 95k on this and no where near that much on the other, similar, car?
I think it could be 80s, but 95 is not the right price for that car.
