FS - 993 GT2 Twin Turbo Upgrade Kit - 1996-1997
#16
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Steve
I am sure it is a great kit regardless of nomenclature. A good 450BHP will make a noticeable difference in driving and response. We tend to be a bit difficult here as you said, don't be discouraged and hope to see you more often.
I am sure it is a great kit regardless of nomenclature. A good 450BHP will make a noticeable difference in driving and response. We tend to be a bit difficult here as you said, don't be discouraged and hope to see you more often.
#17
Banned
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is a good combination. The cat delete will help spoolup. The larger turbines will be a great advantage on pump gas. The lessor back pressure helps reduce detonation.
On 93 oct this setup will have no problem making 450+HP. The additional cooling from the IC will help control detonation as well.
I would not advise running california 91 oct on any turbo car. If you blend in some 100 oct this kit will have no problem hitting the 500hp mark.
On 93 oct this setup will have no problem making 450+HP. The additional cooling from the IC will help control detonation as well.
I would not advise running california 91 oct on any turbo car. If you blend in some 100 oct this kit will have no problem hitting the 500hp mark.
#18
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Remember a factory 430hp full weight 993tt was tested by Sport Auto
0-125mph in 13.5s, so 450+hp with Motronic power curve like the factory's will be very quick. If you read back to when my engine was running an RS engine dyno verified Motronic/twin plug 465@5000rpm and 470hp peak to 6500rpm, it felt plenty quick. Going north of 500hp (as measured by Porsche/Ruf/RS/Maha with experienced operator/Kevin and new toy ) requires cams and bigger than K24 (compressor) turbos. Still looks a decent kit 'tho and no doubt would smoke some other tuner's 600hp.
BTW according to my testing, this intercooler will help control detonation, but slightly "worstely" than a stock one
0-125mph in 13.5s, so 450+hp with Motronic power curve like the factory's will be very quick. If you read back to when my engine was running an RS engine dyno verified Motronic/twin plug 465@5000rpm and 470hp peak to 6500rpm, it felt plenty quick. Going north of 500hp (as measured by Porsche/Ruf/RS/Maha with experienced operator/Kevin and new toy ) requires cams and bigger than K24 (compressor) turbos. Still looks a decent kit 'tho and no doubt would smoke some other tuner's 600hp.
BTW according to my testing, this intercooler will help control detonation, but slightly "worstely" than a stock one
#19
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by K24madness
That is a good combination. The cat delete will help spoolup. The larger turbines will be a great advantage on pump gas. The lessor back pressure helps reduce detonation.
On 93 oct this setup will have no problem making 450+HP. The additional cooling from the IC will help control detonation as well.
I would not advise running california 91 oct on any turbo car. If you blend in some 100 oct this kit will have no problem hitting the 500hp mark.
On 93 oct this setup will have no problem making 450+HP. The additional cooling from the IC will help control detonation as well.
I would not advise running california 91 oct on any turbo car. If you blend in some 100 oct this kit will have no problem hitting the 500hp mark.
It might be news to you but the manufacturers with the help of Bosch are able to tune a car with pump fuel all day long and still meet their advertised Hp ratings.
But the four letter supa tunah likes to use racegas for obvious marketing mustang dyno reasons.
#20
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by pole position
It might be news to you but the manufacturers with the help of Bosch are able to tune a car with pump fuel all day long and still meet their advertised Hp ratings.
Greg H.
#21
Instructor
Confused???
Originally Posted by SPR
I hate those deadbeat losers. What type of crying did the guy try and pull?
SPR,
Didn't your Father-in-Law buy this off Ebay?
If so what gives???
I was a little interested but am now a little leary.
Last edited by 95993RS; 10-25-2005 at 11:19 AM. Reason: Spelling
#22
Banned
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pole position
Besides a handful of enthusiasts it would be pretty accurate to say that 99 % of Porsche, Audi turbo owners plus high compression Ferrari/Lambo owners as well run 91 oct on the west coast.
It might be news to you but the manufacturers with the help of Bosch are able to tune a car with pump fuel all day long and still meet their advertised Hp ratings.
But the four letter supa tunah likes to use racegas for obvious marketing mustang dyno reasons.
It might be news to you but the manufacturers with the help of Bosch are able to tune a car with pump fuel all day long and still meet their advertised Hp ratings.
But the four letter supa tunah likes to use racegas for obvious marketing mustang dyno reasons.
The 91 oct california fuel is NOT the same as blending 93/89 from other states. The 91 oct california fuel is blended with many chemicals that don't respond well to boost. There has been lots of research done to support this.
For all of the money that is spend on these cars the additional cost off blending race gas is minimal. The margin of safety that it adds is worth the price alone. Those who think they can increase boost/performance without addressing the fuel issue are asking for trouble.
#23
I thought the guy picked it up evidently not, hence my initial comment about deadbeat bidders, as it actually pissed me off that he would back out. It had nothing to do with anything with the kit at all but tax pressures and some other things.
#24
Burning Brakes
Guys im not getting it.... why is the HP for all this so consertive compared to my setup (with lousy CIS) single k29, gt2 cams and b&b headers and I am meant to be getting 460 (and maybe 550 when I go Efi).... and this setup wont go much higher than that.
#25
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Miles965uk
Guys im not getting it.... why is the HP for all this so consertive compared to my setup (with lousy CIS) single k29, gt2 cams and b&b headers and I am meant to be getting 460 (and maybe 550 when I go Efi).... and this setup wont go much higher than that.
Your 550hp with EFI may be possible as a peak, personally I again would say not if measured on a Porsche/Ruf/RS engine dyno or a Maha chassis dyno by experienced operator. Your EFI would probably give you a more responsive engine, but you (like the 993tt) are limited by heat and going over 520-530 hp on a 3.6 993tt takes expensive intercooling. Of course if you want to build something which shows its 550hp on a chassis dyno run, thats a different story.
#26
Burning Brakes
Thanks TB- i wasnt ever thinking my setup was anyway better- as I want to aim for a TT setup anyway.... that was my point- you cant just say the numbers thats why i was confused and new something wasnt right - like you say its about the curve- afterall why should it be!
#28
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by orleyd
My 97' has the same turbos (5324-101-5076), intercooler, high flow mufflers/cats, chip, tuned by Mike Levitas at TPC. It made 437 RWHP on a 93 degree day.
Dave
Dave
#29
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by TB993tt
A Dynojet run hp is not same as what we are talking about above. IF you have a real interest in how much power you have, seek out a reputable Maha installation and prepare for disappointment, if not then enjoy your car, like I said 460odd hp is very fast in a 993tt