Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Molybdenum level importance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2018, 11:06 PM
  #1  
ronnie993tt
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
ronnie993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto & Mont Tremblant
Posts: 4,622
Received 234 Likes on 157 Posts
Question Molybdenum level importance?

At the outset, please accept my apology for posting another oil thread but a search did not reveal any information on molybdenum. There is a new thread on the 993 forum in which a Motul rep implies the molybdenum levels in M1 V Twin are lower than in Motul oil resulting in more engine wear. The thread goes on to say the V Twin levels are lower to prevent clutch slippage in motorcycles. However, the M1 V Twin oil analysis' posted on this forum indicate minimal wear levels and so most of us use it. Is there any validity to the desirability of higher moly levels or are the levels in M1 V Twin adequate? Steve and Mike please chime in.....
Old 12-09-2018, 12:28 AM
  #2  
PiB993
Rennlist Member
 
PiB993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,202
Received 151 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

I started to follow that thread too. I don't have your answer but my brother (motorcycle guy) gave me some flack years ago saying the V-twin oil was specific to the wet clutches in motorcycles to keep them from slipping too much. And basically it was a problem for motorcycles simply not working without the clutch gripping enough. Apparently, it's a common mistake newbies to motorcycling make by putting in regular auto oil and then the bike won't go!

Last edited by PiB993; 12-09-2018 at 09:56 AM. Reason: Numerous additions
Old 12-10-2018, 10:32 AM
  #3  
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 15,627
Received 1,368 Likes on 792 Posts
Default

eh, all the UOA i've seen on these cars running vtwin has been excellent. I guess if you were nervous, you could mix mobil 15w50 with Vtwin to come up with a reasonable concoction, but I'd say its unnecessary.
Old 04-28-2020, 08:25 PM
  #4  
PiB993
Rennlist Member
 
PiB993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,202
Received 151 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Greetings - Attached I have a Motul report that clearly shows higher levels of Moly in Motul vs. Mobil V-Twin. 2020 results are Motul 15w-50 and 2019 results are Mobil 1 V-twin 20w-50. However, you might notice MOtul has less zinc and phosphorus but still a fair amount more than standard oils I believe.

Let me know if you can glean any other info from my results.


993-TURBO
Old 04-29-2020, 06:47 PM
  #5  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,362
Received 66 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Ok, here is mine from my Turbo using exclusively V-twin. The moly is definitely less, but zinc is a bit better. You have less miles on your oil though. Interesting about V-twin, definitely good data to consider.

Cheers,

MIke



Old 05-02-2020, 06:43 PM
  #6  
ronnie993tt
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
ronnie993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto & Mont Tremblant
Posts: 4,622
Received 234 Likes on 157 Posts
Default

Thanks for submitting. So what does this tell us? No significant difference in wear so use the less expensive oil? Doesn't this dispel the dreaded water/acid/etc. contamination hypothesis which the frequent oil change proponents use to rationalize a potentially wasteful pursuit?



Quick Reply: Molybdenum level importance?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:02 AM.