Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Most aggressive NB 993 rear wheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2015, 12:02 PM
  #1  
944/951guy
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
944/951guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Most aggressive NB 993 rear wheels

From the people who have had or have aggressive rear wheels on a NB 993 what is the most aggressive size/offset that can be ran without rolling fenders.
I am looking to run 18x9.5 35mm offset, but it looks very close. Anyone know if this will work?
Old 07-20-2015, 12:22 PM
  #2  
boman993
Drifting
 
boman993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Posts: 2,676
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 944/951guy
From the people who have had or have aggressive rear wheels on a NB 993 what is the most aggressive size/offset that can be ran without rolling fenders.
I am looking to run 18x9.5 35mm offset, but it looks very close. Anyone know if this will work?
Not sure off hand, but, 9.5" is not enough meat in the rear! You're going down a half inch from stock width... Check out this thread; lots of good offset info from Bill Verburg re: aggressive wheels:

https://rennlist.com/forums/993-foru...-nb-993-a.html
Old 07-20-2015, 12:28 PM
  #3  
NYC993
Drifting
 
NYC993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Nothern NJ
Posts: 2,286
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

By agressive you mean widest?
Wouldn't you know the widest tire that fits as well? If you know tire, you can figure out what width and the what offset you need.

And of course, as you may know, wider in the rear doesn't mean better as you will be limited in front and can introduce more understeer.
Old 07-20-2015, 01:01 PM
  #4  
nile13
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
nile13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 8,529
Received 90 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

I dunno, I prefer docile wheels. I don't want my wheels, front or rear, to mug the passers buy or slash my ankles. I don;t eve want them to be passive-aggressive, so I try to exercise them at least a couple times a week.
Old 07-20-2015, 01:03 PM
  #5  
Foxman
Rennlist Member
 
Foxman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,428
Received 485 Likes on 360 Posts
Default

I run with 18" X 10"s on BBS Sport Classics II's in winter with no fender rolling necessary. So you can go wider than 9.5"
Old 07-20-2015, 01:37 PM
  #6  
nile13
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
nile13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 8,529
Received 90 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

You could certainly go wider and should go wider. The issue here is low offset which will stick them way out (Sport Classics II have +65 mm offset for 18x10 rears.
Old 07-20-2015, 01:50 PM
  #7  
911LeeN
Rennlist Member
 
911LeeN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 264
Received 35 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

A lot of variables at play (e.g, wheel construction, back pad, offset, rubber size, ride height, etc.), but I've successfully done 18x10 et 47 in the past on a NB with 265/35/18 semi-rounded shoulder tires, some neg camber, sitting between RS and ROW height. Going lower and fiddling with the camber would require a roll in that set up though. I think a safe, good looking and accepted play on a NB is 18x10 et 60.
Old 07-20-2015, 02:03 PM
  #8  
nine9six
Banned
 
nine9six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,465
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I am looking to run 18x9.5 35mm offset,
IMHO...No way, no how!

Std rear wheel offset is 65mm which is about 1/4" from the fender.
The 9.5 wheel width is 1/4" thinner on the inside and outside edge.
This puts the outside edge of the 9.5 wheel approx 1/2" before fender interference.
There is a 30mm difference in outward poke with the 35mm offset wheel you're considering.
1mm = approx .040"
30mm = approx 1.2"
The math doesnt lie...
Old 07-20-2015, 02:25 PM
  #9  
944/951guy
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
944/951guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nine9six
IMHO...No way, no how!

Std rear wheel offset is 65mm which is about 1/4" from the fender.
The 9.5 wheel width is 1/4" thinner on the inside and outside edge.
This puts the outside edge of the 9.5 wheel approx 1/2" before fender interference.
There is a 30mm difference in outward poke with the 35mm offset wheel you're considering.
1mm = approx .040"
30mm = approx 1.2"
The math doesnt lie...
so you think it wont work.........
Old 07-20-2015, 02:26 PM
  #10  
944/951guy
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
944/951guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry guys I was a bit unclear, I am not trying to run as wide as possible.
I want to run Reverse mounted BBS LM which will leave my rear wheels at 18x9.5 with a 35mm offset.
Old 07-20-2015, 06:55 PM
  #11  
911LeeN
Rennlist Member
 
911LeeN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 264
Received 35 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

This should answer your exact question then -- https://rennlist.com/forums/993-foru...ew-stance.html

It's very close, but seems doable (perhaps ). Talk to Juha, he was reverse mounting 18x9.5 (originally with et 55) LMs on a NB.



Quick Reply: Most aggressive NB 993 rear wheels



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:51 PM.