Thoughts on Leaving Oil cooler fan permanently on Hi
#16
Racer
Thread Starter
Does anyone have a reasonable explanation as to why Porsche decided on this more complicated system that allows the oil to run to higher temps?
#17
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
NOISE. They were scratching to reduce noise in many ways, including the engine cover, and finally had to go to liquid cooling (along with emissions issues).
It is fine as stock, except for very hot, heavy traffic days and track days, where i would use a manual switch. Bruce Anderson has published a chart of the relation of engine wear to oil temp in air/oil cooled engines (as have others likely done). Hotter is not better once past minimal operating temp.
It is fine as stock, except for very hot, heavy traffic days and track days, where i would use a manual switch. Bruce Anderson has published a chart of the relation of engine wear to oil temp in air/oil cooled engines (as have others likely done). Hotter is not better once past minimal operating temp.
#18
Wallflower
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I am curious about the thoughts on this one too as I'm planning to pick up my new 993 Saturday and this is one item that was in the PPI for it... I initially was thinking I'd just leave it, but if it potentially causes damage, it seems like an easy enough fix.
#20
Well, if you consider a cycle of engine temps between 180 and about 140, then, sure, the engine isn't too cool. But from everythign I know, that's too cool. This applies to when you're driving in cooler weather, fall/winter/spring. On a hot summer day it's a different story. But where I live, it's cool half the year and runnign the fan on high kept the motor too cold.
#21
Rennlist Member
Yeah that'd be my thinking too ... Surely Porsche would have quite happily ditched the thermostatic system for a much simpler on/off switch , if that's what was called for.
Does anyone have a reasonable explanation as to why Porsche decided on this more complicated system that allows the oil to run to higher temps?
Does anyone have a reasonable explanation as to why Porsche decided on this more complicated system that allows the oil to run to higher temps?
The people on Rennlist are a knowledgable group, but we don't come close to representing the majority of Porsche owners, and I've met some fairly seriously uninformed Porsche owners over the years (Like the guy whose uncle left him a cherry 911 SC and he sold it for $3,000 because it used oil and he couldn't tell where it was going. He was uninformed regarding the idea of an oil cooled car using oil).
Regarding the noise issue, my understanding was that the noise generated by the belt driven engine cooling fan, along with the emissions issues, were the concerns that drove Porsche to go to water cooled engines. I wouldn't think that electric radiator fan on water cooled cars would be any less noisy than the fans on our oil coolers...Would they?
Just a thought...
Terry
#22
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
The 2.7 cars had no external cooler; the SC had a useless "trombone" cooler; the 3.2 Carrera got the radiator-style cooler, they added the fan later ... the 964 and 993 really got the best coolers to the point where they took the first cooler off the engine completely. But it's been an ongoing process for them until they finally went to water cooling.
With the SC, the hot setup was to put a "Turbatrol" cooler on there instead of the factory one; on the early 3.2 Carreras, everyone was adding the later fan setup to the earlier car.
But, for example, anyone who adds a second cooler to a 993 for the track is going to run the oil temps cooler all the time, too, it just works "better" than the standard system.
I go by the old advice ... 180-220 is good, 230 is warm, 240 is hot, 250 is too damn hot ;-)
#23
Racer
Thread Starter
#24
Rennlist Member
Well, I'd recommend..
if you are concerned about engine oil temps, as the Hulkster says, "Hulk the "F" up...and buy a secondary oil cooler. I have the Ruf unit and the cost was worth the peace of mind. Cargraphics is good to...also Carnewal.com sells a cooler.
#27
Overall, I don't know why anyone puts much faith at all in what the factory does. Our 993's came from the factory with ****ty suspensions, and out of the box they run too hot and had valve guides fitted so poorly at the factory that it's not uncommon for many 993's to need top end rebuilds before 50K miles. And it took the factory almost 20 years to install hydraulic chain tensioners. I could go on. We should trust these clowns?
#28
Race Car
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Jose Kalifornia Demokratische Republik
Posts: 3,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Mine doesn't run too hot. I did jumper the fan relay, tho, (over a year ago) so it starts on "high". Engine is still going strong at 84K, judging from the condition of the plugs and 0il consumption: Qt per 4500 mi. I've been thru some pretty heinous traffic jams here and down south. Probably helps to change the oil with 15w50 Mobil 1 every ~5K.
#29
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i do not run a fan at all on my 964 - it was fine (temp wise) to SD and back
in the NW i don't need it at all really and it's heavy
another 964 owner i know runs the dual setup w/o fans and has no issues either (mine is a single cooler setup, stock cooler) and he lives in so Cal.
ymmv
personally for a street car i would not worry about it - porsche did a good job on these cars.
in the NW i don't need it at all really and it's heavy
another 964 owner i know runs the dual setup w/o fans and has no issues either (mine is a single cooler setup, stock cooler) and he lives in so Cal.
ymmv
personally for a street car i would not worry about it - porsche did a good job on these cars.