LPMM, UNHOLY SH!T!!!
03-17-2007, 08:58 AM
#46
Originally Posted by TRINITONY
Anyways, can I or should I do the LPMM and allow for the heat shield or do away with the shields?
03-25-2007, 11:33 PM
#47
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I should be in TNT for Carnival!
Posts: 10,056
Received 249 Likes
on
210 Posts
Mr. PLate
You're da man! 
Today at AX, quite a few people commented and inquired..is it a Turbo, wat kinda exhaust..etc etc. They sounded so good at WOT.
Now all I need is power to match the sound.
Today at AX, quite a few people commented and inquired..is it a Turbo, wat kinda exhaust..etc etc. They sounded so good at WOT.
Now all I need is power to match the sound.
03-26-2007, 02:52 AM
#48
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Svaha
I feel like I took my 993 to the vet and had its ***** put on. Seriously. This is NOT a little difference. I've got crackle if I rev up and let it fall. The whole tone is deeper and more menacing. When I get on it, it positively bellows with a raspy 911 growl. This is how it should have sounded from the factory. 
Two feet of 2" 316 stainless = $28
Two mufflers welded = $60
By far the best $88 I ever spent!
Leland, I've got to hand it to you, you've made my month.
Two feet of 2" 316 stainless = $28
Two mufflers welded = $60
By far the best $88 I ever spent!
Leland, I've got to hand it to you, you've made my month.
Last edited by JohnMetro; 03-18-2010 at 12:20 AM.
03-26-2007, 03:17 PM
#49
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tayside, Scotland.
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vhanzon
Svaha, if you click the "RSRs-vs-Modified-Muffler" videoclip with the two black 993s, the first one to take off is has the RSR's and the 2nd has the LPMM's.. Thats my guess anyways 
.. Great site btw David, love it 
.. Great site btw David, love it
03-26-2007, 03:46 PM
#51
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by David R
Correct. The second car is mine with a 1.5" bypass pipe. I'm planning to remodify them this summer with a larger pipe and cat bypass too...
I like it
but I hesitate to start it up before 8:00am so I don't wake up everyone else in the rowhouses! 
03-26-2007, 05:43 PM
#52
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tayside, Scotland.
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FotoVeloce
You might want to re-think that or at least check out another car with the cat bypass and stock pipes as well as LPMM. I did just the cat bypass and the car is pretty loud (and wicked sounding) with the totally stock cans.
I like it but I hesitate to start it up before 8:00am so I don't wake up everyone else in the rowhouses!
I like it
but I hesitate to start it up before 8:00am so I don't wake up everyone else in the rowhouses! Good job my neighbours love the 911
03-26-2007, 06:56 PM
#53
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by David R
The car has Fabspeed Supercups on at the moment which I think are louder than the cat bypass and lpmm setup. I'm hoping for something a little more cultured than the supercups!
Good job my neighbours love the 911
Good job my neighbours love the 911
Most of my neighbors are retired, and I'm trying to startle them into heart attacks every morning.
04-04-2007, 03:05 AM
#54
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by briefescape
Beautiful day here in Vancouver and had the top down with new tips and 1.5 " LPMM mod. What a nice sound " little rumble in the jungle "
So who did the LPMM mod for you? I just started reading up on this and I'm interested in getting the mod done to mine. I think we need to get together for wobbly one soon so I can check out your rumble!
Cheers
04-04-2007, 03:04 PM
#55
Rennlist Member
Hans - you've got a PM
04-05-2007, 12:30 AM
#56
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by shanepotter
Does it matter which gauge is used? How about flavor, 304, 316 or 321?
04-05-2007, 01:09 AM
#59
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by jo-hans
Hey Guy - remember me from the Duffy Lake ride from last year?
So who did the LPMM mod for you? I just started reading up on this and I'm interested in getting the mod done to mine. I think we need to get together for wobbly one soon so I can check out your rumble!
Cheers
So who did the LPMM mod for you? I just started reading up on this and I'm interested in getting the mod done to mine. I think we need to get together for wobbly one soon so I can check out your rumble!
Cheers
04-05-2007, 02:42 AM
#60
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by nota_troll
Someone recommended 321 but there are 3 different gauges. Heck I'm actually thinking about 2.25.
From the burns website:
321 stainless steel tubing is one of the most desirable materials for exhaust systems because of its excellent resistance to fatigue and cracking at elevated temperatures.
It is usually the material of choice for high temperature turbo applications, unless extreme requirements indicate the use of Inconel.
We have extensive experience with 321 and will be happy to assist you in using it.
304 stainless steel tubing combines excellent physical properties with a remarkable resistance to corrosive agents found in automotive exhaust emissions.
304 tube is the most cost-effective grade of nonmagnetic stainless steel for general applications, but some professional racing teams use the higher heat-resistant properties of aircraft grade 321 stainless steel.
We have considerable experience with stainless header fabrication and will gladly advise our valued customers.
As far as gage is concerned, I would guess that the pipe on the factory muffler is either 16 or 18 gage, but not knowing for sure I would error on the conservative side and go with the 16 gage. It probably wouldn't make much difference either way, but the price difference is minimal and the weight saving would also be minimal by going to 18 gage.
__________________
Last edited by 993_Pilot; 04-05-2007 at 01:56 PM.
