DIY Engine Rebuild - Part VI (6) - Exploring the SAI passages....
#33
Continued thanks for a beautifully executed tutorial for us armchair wrenches!
Some basic questions...
1. I'm assuming the check valve is designed to prevent the exhaust gasses from going directly into the SAI ports. Is that true?
2. Since the air pump is always running, why is a check valve even needed? Is there only positive pressure at higher RPMs?
Some basic questions...
1. I'm assuming the check valve is designed to prevent the exhaust gasses from going directly into the SAI ports. Is that true?
2. Since the air pump is always running, why is a check valve even needed? Is there only positive pressure at higher RPMs?
#34
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by YA911Fan
Continued thanks for a beautifully executed tutorial for us armchair wrenches!
Some basic questions...
1. I'm assuming the check valve is designed to prevent the exhaust gasses from going directly into the SAI ports. Is that true?
2. Since the air pump is always running, why is a check valve even needed? Is there only positive pressure at higher RPMs?
Some basic questions...
1. I'm assuming the check valve is designed to prevent the exhaust gasses from going directly into the SAI ports. Is that true?
2. Since the air pump is always running, why is a check valve even needed? Is there only positive pressure at higher RPMs?
2 - The air pump only runs for 90 seconds when the car is first cold started. If you listen you will hear a whine that shuts off once the car get a bit warmed up. So if the pump shuts off the air pressure is off and then, if the valve is blown, the exhaust can travel from the port through all the piping into the air pump....
Cheers,
Mike
#35
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by Mike J
1 - The check valve is a one-way valve and in only lets air from the pump go into the SAI passages. The air from the exhaust system is not supposed to go pass this valve into the air pump. I am assuming if the valve does not let air go from the ports to the air pump then it does stop the exhaust gases from going directly into the SAI ports. But there would also be a vacuum effect since you have a stream of air going across the port hole in the exhaust chamber so it still might suck some air in but its unlikely, if the valve is doing its job, that air will be flowing into the port hole (does this make any sense?).
2 - The air pump only runs for 90 seconds when the car is first cold started. If you listen you will hear a whine that shuts off once the car get a bit warmed up. So if the pump shuts off the air pressure is off and then, if the valve is blown, the exhaust can travel from the port through all the piping into the air pump....
Cheers,
Mike
2 - The air pump only runs for 90 seconds when the car is first cold started. If you listen you will hear a whine that shuts off once the car get a bit warmed up. So if the pump shuts off the air pressure is off and then, if the valve is blown, the exhaust can travel from the port through all the piping into the air pump....
Cheers,
Mike
Gerry
#36
Hey Mike,
When you drilled that last port out on the cam tower, could you see the drill bit in the opening for the SS feed pipe?
By the way, this has been some of the best info I've seen on this bbs. Great job, and pictures.
Thanks again,
Tim
When you drilled that last port out on the cam tower, could you see the drill bit in the opening for the SS feed pipe?
By the way, this has been some of the best info I've seen on this bbs. Great job, and pictures.
Thanks again,
Tim
#37
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by g_murray
So what's stopping "us" from introducing "anti-carbon fluid" (e.g. Techron, B12)down the 'ducting' that's attached to the air pump. Is it 'too hard' to get to this ducting (underneath) the air pump? Seems to me this would be the easier route than trying (as we've all read) to 'coax' that stubborn check valve off (never mind the effort to get to it in the first place).
Gerry
Gerry
To date, the general consensus is that once you've flushed the ports, replace the valve on a regular basis (every 10-15K). Of course, the PITA here is getting them flushed in the first place.
#38
Racer
Mike,
I, too, am most appreciative of this effort to educate us all.
One question: If one was (attempting) to clean the ports from the bottom up using a probe or wire, how long would the wire need to be to reach from the exhaust port outlet to the distribution channel at the top of the cam carrier?
Thanks again for the insite
I, too, am most appreciative of this effort to educate us all.
One question: If one was (attempting) to clean the ports from the bottom up using a probe or wire, how long would the wire need to be to reach from the exhaust port outlet to the distribution channel at the top of the cam carrier?
Thanks again for the insite
#39
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by tam993
Hey Mike,
When you drilled that last port out on the cam tower, could you see the drill bit in the opening for the SS feed pipe?
When you drilled that last port out on the cam tower, could you see the drill bit in the opening for the SS feed pipe?
No, the problem is that the opening is 90 degrees to the cast feed pipe in the cam tower. There is very little to see in the opening other than the bottom of the feed pipe. When the drill bit goes in you can feel when it gets past the carbon and then its free for about 1/2" and then hits the bottom of the "T" junction with the cast in pipe.
I will do some more pictures later today and post...
Mike,
Originally Posted by ecobb993
I, too, am most appreciative of this effort to educate us all.
One question: If one was (attempting) to clean the ports from the bottom up using a probe or wire, how long would the wire need to be to reach from the exhaust port outlet to the distribution channel at the top of the cam carrier?
One question: If one was (attempting) to clean the ports from the bottom up using a probe or wire, how long would the wire need to be to reach from the exhaust port outlet to the distribution channel at the top of the cam carrier?
BTW has anyone tried to use a flexible pipe brush (like the one I use in the above pictures) to clean the ports from below. I have not tried it but maybe I will mock it up and try. It is much easier on the bench than on your back from below (yes, I have done that! ;-) )
Cheers,
Mike
#41
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Toga
John D if you read, it's time to change the note "addict" to "professor" in Mike's avatar window
we are learning here!!
Thanks Mike!
we are learning here!!
Thanks Mike!
Cheers,
Mike
#42
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by Mike J
I am just trying to give back to the list all the support I received when I had my rust problems with my Targa Top. The outpouring of support was incredible with over 100 rennlisters signing up...this is a community so anything I can do to contribute is worth it.
Cheers,
Mike
Cheers,
Mike
#43
Rennlist Member
Mike,
This has helped me understand the problem better than anything I have seen. Forgive my ignorance. I have about 30k (10k track miles) and live in a non-inspection state. Will I hurt the engine, or cause power loss if I let that carbon accumulate, and ignore it?
By the way, the susp. parts you made for me are still serving me well.
This has helped me understand the problem better than anything I have seen. Forgive my ignorance. I have about 30k (10k track miles) and live in a non-inspection state. Will I hurt the engine, or cause power loss if I let that carbon accumulate, and ignore it?
By the way, the susp. parts you made for me are still serving me well.
#44
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by Chuck Price
Mike,
This has helped me understand the problem better than anything I have seen. Forgive my ignorance. I have about 30k (10k track miles) and live in a non-inspection state. Will I hurt the engine, or cause power loss if I let that carbon accumulate, and ignore it?
By the way, the susp. parts you made for me are still serving me well.
This has helped me understand the problem better than anything I have seen. Forgive my ignorance. I have about 30k (10k track miles) and live in a non-inspection state. Will I hurt the engine, or cause power loss if I let that carbon accumulate, and ignore it?
By the way, the susp. parts you made for me are still serving me well.
i) if they get clogged ...do you REALLY wanna drive around with the CEL on all the time (I see you've a '96 ..so yours is 'obd-ii -- and the clogging WOULD trigger the CEL). How embarrassing would that be?!
ii) if you ever moved out of state or (for whatever reason) your state DID mandate an emissions inspection ..you'd be in deep-doo-doo.
iii) if you ever wanted to sell the car ...see number ii) above.
Since our compatriots, in the UK, don't have this CEL-dilemma, I seriously doubt as to whether having them clogged would affect drivability etc. etc.
My $0.02
G.
#45
Rennlist Member
G.
I'd be less concerned if I knew the light were unimportant, as it seems to be. But, given the difficulty of the fix, and given the fact that my car is mostly driven on the track, I'd rather spend the money on performance enhancements. If I move out of state, I can worry about that if and when the time comes. As far as being embarassed...ironically, I drive my 993 despite what people think, not because of it. If someone rides with me and they are worried about the light...I'm doing something wrong!
Thanks for the info, though.
I'd be less concerned if I knew the light were unimportant, as it seems to be. But, given the difficulty of the fix, and given the fact that my car is mostly driven on the track, I'd rather spend the money on performance enhancements. If I move out of state, I can worry about that if and when the time comes. As far as being embarassed...ironically, I drive my 993 despite what people think, not because of it. If someone rides with me and they are worried about the light...I'm doing something wrong!
Thanks for the info, though.