Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

G5021 gearbox vs varioram?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2019, 01:55 AM
  #1  
Railmaster.
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Railmaster.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,480
Received 107 Likes on 78 Posts
Default G5021 gearbox vs varioram?

Dear fellow rennlisters!

I just read the thread about 95 vs 96 993s and the varioram is a great advantage of the later cars.
But will a car with G5020 gearbox and varioram be more desireable / a "better" car than a G5021 (ROW gearbox except for the last years when replaced by G5020) non varioram car, the theoretical cars in this thread are equal apart from the subject of the thread.
Old 01-12-2019, 09:02 AM
  #2  
Endoman
Pro
 
Endoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bolton UK
Posts: 634
Received 54 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

I suppose it depends on use. The closer ratio gearbox will be of great benefit on track. Whereas the top end power on Vram and non isn't much different. For street use the Vram would be preferable with it's greater low down torque making the G5020 less of a hinderance. Non-vram and G5020 is the worst of both worlds. I have G21 and have retro-fitted Vram and LWF. The car is also approx. 300lbs lighter than std. It's great fun to drive
Old 01-12-2019, 10:43 AM
  #3  
JB 911
Rennlist Member
 
JB 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 2,156
Received 90 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

I have G5020 and Varioram and 2-6 gear its fun to drive. Its just the 1st to 2nd shift that's really lacking imo. So assuming the question is at a 95 owner looking to do only one upgrade, unless you do a lot of city driving in traffic (lots of 1-2 shifts) I'd think the varioram would yield better dividends for overall driving experience. Ideally though I'm sure both must be a blast to drive not to mention the 300lb weight reduction. Endoman, could you share a short list of how you managed the 300lb weight drop?
Old 01-12-2019, 11:51 AM
  #4  
pp000830
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
pp000830's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 9,594
Received 1,446 Likes on 1,018 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by JB 911
could you share a short list of how you managed the 300lb weight drop?
I would be happy to lose a few pounds too 25 would be great 50 would be fantastic, I would simply disappear before I could lose 300.
Andy
Old 01-12-2019, 12:43 PM
  #5  
Endoman
Pro
 
Endoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bolton UK
Posts: 634
Received 54 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JB 911
I have G5020 and Varioram and 2-6 gear its fun to drive. Its just the 1st to 2nd shift that's really lacking imo. So assuming the question is at a 95 owner looking to do only one upgrade, unless you do a lot of city driving in traffic (lots of 1-2 shifts) I'd think the varioram would yield better dividends for overall driving experience. Ideally though I'm sure both must be a blast to drive not to mention the 300lb weight reduction. Endoman, could you share a short list of how you managed the 300lb weight drop?
'94 Coupe curb weight 3.020.lb
993 RS curb weight 2729 lb
Sunroof delete, seats and interior strip accounts for most of it

Old 01-12-2019, 12:45 PM
  #6  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,171
Received 506 Likes on 187 Posts
Default

The shorter ratio gearbox will transform the car under all driving conditions. But properly done it will cost you $10K+ and you'd want to do a proper LSD and possibly clutch & LWFW while in there. That's another several grand.

A Varioram conversion depending on the cost of the parts and labor will run you in the $2.5-4K range.

Losing 300 lbs is easy - remove sunroof, airbags (including lower dash), radio, speakers, wiring, heater blower (and A/C if you dare). Then replace seats w. light weight buckets, RS door cards, remove sound deadening, install light weight carpet and glass. Done.
Old 01-12-2019, 02:17 PM
  #7  
Edward
Addicted Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: So.CA
Posts: 6,072
Received 297 Likes on 177 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ilko
The shorter ratio gearbox will transform the car under all driving conditions. But properly done it will cost you $10K+ and you'd want to do a proper LSD and possibly clutch & LWFW while in there. That's another several grand.

A Varioram conversion depending on the cost of the parts and labor will run you in the $2.5-4K range.

Losing 300 lbs is easy - remove sunroof, airbags (including lower dash), radio, speakers, wiring, heater blower (and A/C if you dare). Then replace seats w. light weight buckets, RS door cards, remove sound deadening, install light weight carpet and glass. Done.
1. As a DD, my 95 feels great (just hit 170k miles! ), but no doubt the G21 box would make things feel a bit more lively! But at that cost for "more lively" on the street?...nah OTOH, if one were already going into the trans for work anyway, now there'd be the opportunity!

2. Retrofit to vario is not, imho, worthwhile even for a DD car, and even not for track, IMHO. Sure the midrange is a modest improvement, but not a $4k improvement. Just in terms of the general discussion, if one wanted the vario when shopping for a 993, then sure, I get that, look for 96-98 as that makes complete sense. But in terms of a so-called "great" advantage, I'd firmly disagree, particularly when so many other factors affect a 23+yo car's condition and health that limiting one's self to only vario cars for this "great" advantage is arguably a limiting criterion ...wholly imho, of course. If one were to drive them back to back, perhaps they just may agree

3. That 300lb weight loss is great! Except I like my heat, AC, airbags (yeah, I'd really like to keep that one if that ever happens!!!), radio, lower dash (if only for aesthetics), comfy stock seats, and though my sunroof is currently non-op I wanna get it fixed. Which leaves me with carpet and glass ...not sure I'd get much there

Edward
Old 01-12-2019, 04:02 PM
  #8  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,171
Received 506 Likes on 187 Posts
Default

In other words you like your car stock. Yay!
Old 01-13-2019, 01:01 PM
  #9  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,249
Received 508 Likes on 348 Posts
Default

lower gearing and lower weight are assets all the time, vram is only an asset at wot form 3500-5500 rpm
Old 01-14-2019, 02:19 PM
  #10  
Edward
Addicted Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: So.CA
Posts: 6,072
Received 297 Likes on 177 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ilko
In other words you like your car stock. Yay!
Nah, not exactly. Just claiming poverty and jealousy

I totally agree 300lbs net loss is great, but it wholly depends on the mission of the car. For folks who are willing to do that to their 993, more power to em!! I'm not one to contradict as I've done the gutting routine, albeit in my 911SC. Very modest mods but whole lotta lightening ...2550 half-fueled, yeah, all worth it!!!

Truth be told, I would love the shorter 993 gearbox even for a DD ...just the coin would be painful. But like I had said, if one were going in for trans work anyway, I think it'd be silly not to make some changes to a few of the ratios to make it more spirited!!

Edward



Quick Reply: G5021 gearbox vs varioram?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:51 PM.