Rennlist - Porsche Discussion Forums

Rennlist - Porsche Discussion Forums (https://rennlist.com/forums/)
-   993 Forum (https://rennlist.com/forums/993-forum-58/)
-   -   3.8 build. Standard cams or RS? (https://rennlist.com/forums/993-forum/1075300-3-8-build-standard-cams-or-rs.html)

aircooledbug 06-14-2018 06:42 PM

3.8 build. Standard cams or RS?
 
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f8eba7774.jpeg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...cd834c291.jpeg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...04f3748c4.jpeg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a53ac130b.jpeg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c1255a059.jpeg
About to rebuild a C2S (Varioram) to 3.8. Cams look good still so could be put back in. Has anyone any insight into whether or not to use the original profile ones or move to something closer to an RS cam.

My understanding is with the standard profile the car will be much smoother at lower revs, and with the RS cams it will have a lumpy idle but develop more power/BHP.

The car is unlikely to ever see a track. It will be used on long road trips/touring/driven quickly but I also live in London so having a car that does not cut out in traffic is probably wise. Having said that my one and only complaint with the car is it has always felt (to me) that it could do with just a little more go.

It also has a LWF which I have no issue with.

There is a depth of knowledge on here however I don’t seem to be able to find a decent review of a 3.8 with standard cams or much about living with one with an RS cam. Can anyone shed some light?

Photos of the worn stuff for those with a fetish. :)

Bill Verburg 06-14-2018 10:14 PM


Originally Posted by antgtv (Post 15079696)
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f8eba7774.jpeg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...cd834c291.jpeg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...04f3748c4.jpeg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a53ac130b.jpeg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c1255a059.jpeg
About to rebuild a C2S (Varioram) to 3.8. Cams look good still so could be put back in. Has anyone any insight into whether or not to use the original profile ones or move to something closer to an RS cam.

My understanding is with the standard profile the car will be much smoother at lower revs, and with the RS cams it will have a lumpy idle but develop more power/BHP.

The car is unlikely to ever see a track. It will be used on long road trips/touring/driven quickly but I also live in London so having a car that does not cut out in traffic is probably wise. Having said that my one and only complaint with the car is it has always felt (to me) that it could do with just a little more go.

It also has a LWF which I have no issue with.

There is a depth of knowledge on here however I don’t seem to be able to find a decent review of a 3.8 with standard cams or much about living with one with an RS cam. Can anyone shed some light?

Photos of the worn stuff for those with a fetish. :)

RS or SS

jeanhules 06-15-2018 01:32 AM

I'd talk to Colin at 9M. I went RS and regret not putting something from him in there.

aircooledbug 06-15-2018 05:38 AM

SS is for mechanical not hydraulic, or am I confused?

Could you elaborate on why you regret the RS cam, was the car difficult to live with on the road?

Cemoto 06-15-2018 07:05 AM

I have Webcam billet Euro RS grind. The builder also machined grooves in camshaft main bearings. 22k miles since the build and very strong. No regrets but I'm glad the previous owner paid for it. :-)

Bill Verburg 06-15-2018 09:24 AM


Originally Posted by antgtv (Post 15080599)
SS is for mechanical not hydraulic, or am I confused?
....

Correct

Porsche-ah 06-15-2018 11:36 PM

I have Webcam RS cams in the car with solid lifters. Then with the supercharger build I put back the hydraulic lifters.
I hated having to pay to adjust them every other oil change.

JPS 06-16-2018 12:31 AM

Webcam RS sent to Steve at Rennsport for a little massaging.


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:13 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands