Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2020 NEXT GENERATION 992 SPY PICS & RELEASE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2018, 07:48 PM
  #3931  
Cautery
Instructor
 
Cautery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Noah Fect
What the hell, it looks burned out? Having already made the bad decision not to illuminate the entire strip, who thought it was a good idea to fade it out in the middle? And why do they still have a job?

Edit: I guess it is burned out, going by the photo in the other thread:

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d5b2f19d33.jpg

Or there's a multiplexing or rolling-shutter effect at work.
The car in that picture have rear lights on so the strips illuminates for the whole!
When the lights are off, the stop signal seems to make that weird fades effect in the middle... 😟
Old 12-10-2018, 09:12 PM
  #3932  
nimprojects
Racer
 
nimprojects's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 263
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cautery
The car in that picture have rear lights on so the strips illuminates for the whole!
When the lights are off, the stop signal seems to make that weird fades effect in the middle... 😟
Yep. It designed that way. Here’s another pic. I took it at the LA Auto Show…





Old 12-10-2018, 10:08 PM
  #3933  
STG
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Name:  photo981.jpg
Views: 1316
Size:  318.4 KB
Old 12-11-2018, 03:22 AM
  #3934  
Cautery
Instructor
 
Cautery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nimprojects


Yep. It designed that way. Here’s another pic. I took it at the LA Auto Show…





totally nosense... 😖
Old 12-11-2018, 01:29 PM
  #3935  
Cautery
Instructor
 
Cautery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If you want to see how to remove the awful cupholder, add "www" to this link because I am not able to embed it...

.instagram.com/p/BrOdAVLAHcb/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&igshid=1g7rdm1v89l8w







Last edited by Cautery; 12-14-2018 at 07:44 AM.
Old 12-13-2018, 10:46 PM
  #3936  
Ccpecot
Rennlist Member
 
Ccpecot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Johns Creek, GA
Posts: 261
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Latest pics of the cabriolet...

https://www.autoblog.com/2018/12/13/...#slide-7486188
Old 12-14-2018, 01:29 AM
  #3937  
Argon_
Pro
 
Argon_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: CT
Posts: 708
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ccpecot
I think it looks better than the hardtop... for the first time ever. The lines of the soft top break up the disconcerting weirdness of the rear end.
Old 12-18-2018, 05:47 AM
  #3938  
K-A
Drifting
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,452
Received 135 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stealthpilot
From reading your post, I think the Jaguar F-Type is ideally suited for you. Very iconic and tactile. Lots of analog dials. Proper gear lever that works. Sport mode selector switch without need for sport chrono. No sport chrono. Not too luxurious. Vents in the traditional place.

Porsche has always been a more forward looking brand. And this car is going to kill it from a sales perspective. But there are options for those who want something more traditional.
Forward looking? A car that's looked the same for 60 years, has a rear engine and prioritizes perfecting heritage rather than radically transforming it? Not to mention the fact that the 992 will look like a 991 to 99.99% of people, and has literally made "retro" its main design theme (something I applaud and like, btw).

The F Type isn't exactly iconic, and arguably can be said to be more modern looking than a 992. I don't find an F Type to be all that tactile, not as much as a 991, not as many analogue dials. I actually drove an F Type again recently. Not a bad car, actually quite good, but not as sporty as a 991, doesn't sound as raw and untethered as a 991.1 (its exhaust is almost embarrassingly synthetic with those ridiculously engineered and replicated backfires), and the deal breaker: A slushbox which feels very much like a slushbox.

Originally Posted by skiahh
I don't think so. The 992 is much closer to those original lines.


I see what you mean in regards to the fact that the 992 is a purposeful retro throwback, clearly making an effort to mimic the lines of the early 911. However, what I mean is I find the 991's more simple, analogue and effortless homage to said early 911, to be a more authentic evolution. The 992 is an homage for homage's sake, imo, while the 991 is a clear homage in the sense where it carries the bloodline, but doesn't try to advertise that fact. When you sit in the cars; the 992 feels like anything but a classic 911, what with all the digital gauges, massive vertical dashboard space, etc. The 991 actually feels similar to sitting in a classic 911 much more so. Execution vs optics. If it wasn't for the 991's lower screen, it would look even more like the classic design more so than the 992, imo.

Originally Posted by nimprojects





Ewwww, that looks horrible! Looks like the middle section is burnt out. The stance and architecture (which is close to identical to the 991 architecture), however: A++.
Old 12-19-2018, 06:54 PM
  #3939  
Wing Commander
Drifting
 
Wing Commander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 3,029
Received 1,175 Likes on 431 Posts
Default

Interesting comparative photo:



Old 12-19-2018, 10:29 PM
  #3940  
F80-911
Track Day
 
F80-911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wing Commander
Interesting comparative photo:



which gen is the middle car?
Old 12-19-2018, 10:30 PM
  #3941  
F80-911
Track Day
 
F80-911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K-A
Forward looking? A car that's looked the same for 60 years, has a rear engine and prioritizes perfecting heritage rather than radically transforming it? Not to mention the fact that the 992 will look like a 991 to 99.99% of people, and has literally made "retro" its main design theme (something I applaud and like, btw).

The F Type isn't exactly iconic, and arguably can be said to be more modern looking than a 992. I don't find an F Type to be all that tactile, not as much as a 991, not as many analogue dials. I actually drove an F Type again recently. Not a bad car, actually quite good, but not as sporty as a 991, doesn't sound as raw and untethered as a 991.1 (its exhaust is almost embarrassingly synthetic with those ridiculously engineered and replicated backfires), and the deal breaker: A slushbox which feels very much like a slushbox.



I see what you mean in regards to the fact that the 992 is a purposeful retro throwback, clearly making an effort to mimic the lines of the early 911. However, what I mean is I find the 991's more simple, analogue and effortless homage to said early 911, to be a more authentic evolution. The 992 is an homage for homage's sake, imo, while the 991 is a clear homage in the sense where it carries the bloodline, but doesn't try to advertise that fact. When you sit in the cars; the 992 feels like anything but a classic 911, what with all the digital gauges, massive vertical dashboard space, etc. The 991 actually feels similar to sitting in a classic 911 much more so. Execution vs optics. If it wasn't for the 991's lower screen, it would look even more like the classic design more so than the 992, imo.



Ewwww, that looks horrible! Looks like the middle section is burnt out. The stance and architecture (which is close to identical to the 991 architecture), however: A++.
I agree. At first glance, the 992 really looks like a refreshed 991.
Old 12-19-2018, 10:38 PM
  #3942  
Argon_
Pro
 
Argon_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: CT
Posts: 708
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F80-911


which gen is the middle car?
991.2
Old 12-19-2018, 11:22 PM
  #3943  
K-A
Drifting
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,452
Received 135 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wing Commander
Interesting comparative photo:



The 992 is obviously a beefed out 991, but man does the 991 look absolutely flawlessly fluid in its architecture and proportions. No gimmicks whatsoever, they just designed it to be holistically proper.

Originally Posted by F80-911


I agree. At first glance, the 992 really looks like a refreshed 991.
Agreed. Most people will never tell the difference.
Old 12-19-2018, 11:52 PM
  #3944  
limegreen
Pro
 
limegreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 661
Received 137 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K-A
The 992 is obviously a beefed out 991, but man does the 991 look absolutely flawlessly fluid in its architecture and proportions. No gimmicks whatsoever, they just designed it to be holistically proper.


Porsche really screwed themselves with the 991’s exterior design. They got it so right that it would prove near impossible to surpass without serious effort or a complete redesign to reset with ( i.e.993 to 996).

With the 992 they did neither and failed miserably as a result.
Old 12-20-2018, 08:56 AM
  #3945  
STG
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F80-911
which gen is the middle car?

991.2


Quick Reply: 2020 NEXT GENERATION 992 SPY PICS & RELEASE



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:57 PM.