Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2020 NEXT GENERATION 992 SPY PICS & RELEASE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2018, 01:33 AM
  #3181  
evilfij
SJW, a Carin' kinda guy
Rennlist Member
 
evilfij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the internet
Posts: 6,786
Received 621 Likes on 433 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes


The 964 was the worst looking 911 ever made and possibly the ugliest car Porsche has ever produced. The fact that Singer can turn those turds into works of art is one of the great wonders of the world.
Long hoods are stunning, G-body is ugly, 964 is ugly, 993 they sort of got it right, but the entire 1974-98 was a compromise of the original design. All singer does, in essence, is install long hood style body panels on 964 with wider tenders.
Old 10-16-2018, 08:10 AM
  #3182  
Argon_
Pro
 
Argon_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: CT
Posts: 708
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes


The 964 was the worst looking 911 ever made and possibly the ugliest car Porsche has ever produced. The fact that Singer can turn those turds into works of art is one of the great wonders of the world.
The G body diving board was much worse.
Old 10-16-2018, 09:41 AM
  #3183  
Randy M
Drifting
 
Randy M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,332
Received 709 Likes on 322 Posts
Default

I grew up in the era of G bodies and I still like them a great deal. I always thought the long hoods looked ancient in comparison. The best looking air-cooled car was the 993 however. The 964 was never on my radar as the design of the bumpers killed the look of the 911 for me.
Old 10-16-2018, 01:09 PM
  #3184  
99999
Racer
 
99999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Generally in OT / P&C
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
Not only caught your drift, smacked me in the head!!

Macan, Cayenne, Panamera

Attachment 1293980

Attachment 1293982

Attachment 1293979

Attachment 1293981

Attachment 1293983

Attachment 1293984

Attachment 1293985
we have a 2018 Macan S. Perfect car, and still pretty masculine. I wouldn’t touch a 2019 at all. The rear taillights make the whole thing look like a cheap Kia chick car. It’s aweful. I’m at disney now and had to rent a car. Was offered a 2019 Porsche Cayenne, got a chance to check it out inside and out, just so bland. So boring, looks less like a Porsche than any of its predecessors, IMO. Ended up renting the Maserati Levantine, that has some personality. Still love my 991 Turbo, and I like the new 992. I actually like the more chiseled and smaller headlights. I really wish they had left the Macan alone and did more with the new Cayenne.
Old 10-16-2018, 02:52 PM
  #3185  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,857 Likes on 1,901 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Argon_
The G body diving board was much worse.
Could not disagree more. The G body cars look so much better than the 964. The 964 did't even look like a 911 to me. It looked like someone took a marshmallow, pressed it into kinda 911 shape, slapped the ugliest wheels on it and called it a car.
Old 10-16-2018, 02:56 PM
  #3186  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,270
Received 259 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skiahh
I'm wondering if his sacrilegious theory is that the 912 will reappear as the hybrid or all EV version of the Carrera?
That actually makes a lot of sense...4-cylinder hybrid with a retro badge. Not that I'd buy one, but I think it would do well...

I think pure EV Porsches will be on unique platforms.
Old 10-16-2018, 03:12 PM
  #3187  
Wing Commander
Drifting
 
Wing Commander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 3,029
Received 1,175 Likes on 431 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
If you're gonna go old skool, do it right or don't do it at all.

RUF

Attachment 1294005

Attachment 1294004

Attachment 1294007
Now you’re talking - what a stunner!
Old 10-16-2018, 03:52 PM
  #3188  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,270
Received 259 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DKST
Little Photoshop quicky comparing a 991.2 with 20" Turbo wheels to the (presumably) 992 C4S:

With so much negativity, thought I'd put a positive spin on it...coming from somebody that has had and enjoyed long-hood, G-model, 993, and 997 generations:

The side markers finally look right-side up, and the shape is echoed in the door handles. Nice design. Always hated how the bumper seam was forced up into the headlights on the 991, and continues to be awkward between headlights and frunk lid. The 992 is simplicity here, regardless of previous 911 designs...of which you can see some long hood, some G-model/964, and some 993 if you think about it. In comparison the 991's creases on top of the bumpers are pointless, trying to provide something visually in the empty space between the frunk lid and front of the car, whereas the 992 brings the frunk lid forward so the long nose makes more sense visually (that said, I haven't liked the long front overhang on any water-cooled models). Wider front track looks great and will improve handling. The frunk lid creases are a bit retro, but they work IMO...makes the wide, flat lid on the 991 look bland.

I do think the intakes and side view mirrors are a bit too square for such a rounded design, but not enough to bother me.
Old 10-16-2018, 04:41 PM
  #3189  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,857 Likes on 1,901 Posts
Default

The car on the left looks simple, organic, elegant. The car on the right looks angular, angry and busy. You can't look at those two pictures and with a straight face say the headlight/hood/bumper transition area looks better on the 992.
Old 10-16-2018, 04:51 PM
  #3190  
Psorcery
Banned
 
Psorcery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Received 170 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
The car on the left looks simple, organic, elegant. The car on the right looks angular, angry and busy. You can't look at those two pictures and with a straight face say the headlight/hood/bumper transition area looks better on the 992.
Agreed, that whole fender swallowing the headlight look is bad. Real bad. Too many lines going all over the place in different directions. Looks cheap. Something in in the sub 20k new car segment.

However, in time Porsche will make a refresh or some kind of fascia that will fix it all. They actually already have it but they just not showing us yet.

Also the sport design mirrors on the 991 shame the 992 elephant ear mirrors ala Lexus.
Old 10-16-2018, 05:46 PM
  #3191  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,270
Received 259 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
The car on the left looks simple, organic, elegant. The car on the right looks angular, angry and busy. You can't look at those two pictures and with a straight face say the headlight/hood/bumper transition area looks better on the 992.
I don't need to look at the pictures to know I like the 992 exterior better.
Old 10-16-2018, 05:54 PM
  #3192  
chuckbdc
Race Car
 
chuckbdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 3,556
Received 309 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

The essential differences are, for me, a yawn. The 992 shape looks like a 991 with new caps front an rear, and there is nothing I don't like about the 991 or the 992. I saw a 992 on the road with the spoiler up and thought it looked just as "interesting" as the 991s. Nothing sleek about either - no worse that the old ducktail- but not close to the class of a "real" Turbo.

It will take a substantial performance improvement to get me interested. That could happen, but to be honest (with myself), I haven't ever been disappointed by the performance of my SPASM PSE NA C2S.
Old 10-16-2018, 06:09 PM
  #3193  
shewu
Racer
 
shewu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: NY metro area
Posts: 250
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dewinator


Well nobody's made a manual hybrid, so automatic only = not a sports car.
Hondas don't count (OG Insight and CR-Z)?
Old 10-16-2018, 07:09 PM
  #3194  
SkipSauls
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
SkipSauls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Trying to catch-up/keep-up with this thread is a challenge! Love most of the 992 design cues, with the "squared-off" hood opening being a favorite. My first Porsche was a Boxster, which I loved, but when I got a 993 C4S, I realized what Porsche styling could and should be. A 928 S4 also opened my eyes a bit, and I came to view the 986/996 as "less than" many predecessors.

The 997 regained the Porsche-magic a bit, and the 991 blew me away. I'm hoping the 992 makes me feel the same way as when I first saw the 991. Some of the rear-end styling elements give me pause, but will hopefully work well in the metal.
Old 10-16-2018, 09:01 PM
  #3195  
tgcrun
Three Wheelin'
 
tgcrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,319
Received 438 Likes on 234 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
With so much negativity, thought I'd put a positive spin on it...coming from somebody that has had and enjoyed long-hood, G-model, 993, and 997 generations:

The side markers finally look right-side up, and the shape is echoed in the door handles. Nice design. Always hated how the bumper seam was forced up into the headlights on the 991, and continues to be awkward between headlights and frunk lid. The 992 is simplicity here, regardless of previous 911 designs...of which you can see some long hood, some G-model/964, and some 993 if you think about it. In comparison the 991's creases on top of the bumpers are pointless, trying to provide something visually in the empty space between the frunk lid and front of the car, whereas the 992 brings the frunk lid forward so the long nose makes more sense visually (that said, I haven't liked the long front overhang on any water-cooled models). Wider front track looks great and will improve handling. The frunk lid creases are a bit retro, but they work IMO...makes the wide, flat lid on the 991 look bland.

I do think the intakes and side view mirrors are a bit too square for such a rounded design, but not enough to bother me.
I second the positive spin. As more camo is removed, the more I like the looks of the 992, especially in the new blue color. Add in more power, better handling and updated technology, and I'm glad I'm first on the list for a 992 Targa.


Quick Reply: 2020 NEXT GENERATION 992 SPY PICS & RELEASE



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:07 PM.