Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2020 NEXT GENERATION 992 SPY PICS & RELEASE

Old 09-29-2018, 08:57 AM
  #2851  
limegreen
Pro
 
limegreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 661
Received 137 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by viseman
The design seems confused and unsure of itself.
I would say that also describes Porsche as a brand right now as they too seem confused unsure of themselves.


Originally Posted by arek


Imho they’re fine. Probably more aerodynamic.

They pop out when you unlock the car:
https://youtu.be/70V3KBt5heA
More needless , cheesy “ oh gee whiz “ add on’s. In reality it’s just one more thing to break.
Old 09-29-2018, 12:16 PM
  #2852  
Thinc2
Pro
 
Thinc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 543
Received 186 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by limegreen


I would say that also describes Porsche as a brand right now as they too seem confused unsure of themselves.


Feels just the opposite to me. Porsche is on fire - they understand their global customer demographic and are moving to a new design language that is consistent and will sell a ton of cars and SUVs. Even though I wish they would leave design separation between the 911 and the Panamera, the reality is they creating a new, modern style for their whole line of vehicles. I also think they are out ahead of most auto makers in terms of electrification and will release some highly competent and attractive vehicles in this segment.

I think the future looks amazingly bright for Porsche.
Old 09-29-2018, 01:06 PM
  #2853  
Needsdecaf
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Needsdecaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Woodlands, TX.
Posts: 8,812
Received 2,524 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arek


Imho they’re fine. Probably more aerodynamic.

They pop out when you unlock the car:
https://youtu.be/70V3KBt5heA

Great. More needlessly complex crap to break.
Old 09-29-2018, 01:50 PM
  #2854  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,088
Received 2,135 Likes on 977 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Needsdecaf



Great. More needlessly complex crap to break.
....and weight
Old 09-29-2018, 08:33 PM
  #2855  
limegreen
Pro
 
limegreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 661
Received 137 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thinc2
Feels just the opposite to me. Porsche is on fire - they understand their global customer demographic and are moving to a new design language that is consistent and will sell a ton of cars and SUVs. Even though I wish they would leave design separation between the 911 and the Panamera, the reality is they creating a new, modern style for their whole line of vehicles. I also think they are out ahead of most auto makers in terms of electrification and will release some highly competent and attractive vehicles in this segment.

I think the future looks amazingly bright for Porsche.
If outright vehicle sales volume is how you measure success then absolutely, they are on fire.

However,

If your like me and extremely saddened to witness a storied pure sports car manufacture sell out to mainstream nonsense then what you might see instead is a very confused company that has lost its focus and prioritizes cross overs and SUV’s over that of the sports cars that made them relevant and successful in the first place.


Old 09-29-2018, 08:41 PM
  #2856  
DKST
Racer
 
DKST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 308
Received 137 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by limegreen

If your like me and extremely saddened to witness a storied pure sports car manufacture sell out to mainstream nonsense then what you might see instead is a very confused company that has lost its focus and prioritizes cross overs and SUV’s over that of the sports cars that made them relevant and successful in the first place.
There will always be hardcore enthusiasts who dislike the course of many emotional brands. Let’s not forget, if Porsche didn’t start building more mainstream cars (cash cows), they’d most probably be bankrupt by now. As we say in German “one has to die one death”.
”.
Old 09-29-2018, 09:23 PM
  #2857  
HenryPcar
Three Wheelin'
 
HenryPcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,965
Received 233 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Porsche have a problem maintaining that Porsche mystique over all these years. How do you design a car that retains the original 911 shape for the last 50 years with new designs every year. I'm afraid it is running out of ideas and inspiration. It is getting to a point where Porsches are paranoid to deviate from its original 911 shape. Not like Ferraris or Lambos where every model start on a clean sheet of canvas with its unique bold, sexy, sassy, curves and shape that is refreshingly pleasant visually, while Porsche is stuck with its own success. We can't really blame Porsche for trying, and the current 992 is the result. How else can you be creative and refreshingly new after over 50 years of the same classic shape. Just how can you deviate from it and give us a new refreshing look ?
Old 09-29-2018, 10:05 PM
  #2858  
WhipE350
Burning Brakes
 
WhipE350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Near Charlotte NC
Posts: 965
Received 86 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HenryPcar
Porsche have a problem maintaining that Porsche mystique over all these years. How do you design a car that retains the original 911 shape for the last 50 years with new designs every year. I'm afraid it is running out of ideas and inspiration. It is getting to a point where Porsches are paranoid to deviate from its original 911 shape. Not like Ferraris or Lambos where every model start on a clean sheet of canvas with its unique bold, sexy, sassy, curves and shape that is refreshingly pleasant visually, while Porsche is stuck with its own success. We can't really blame Porsche for trying, and the current 992 is the result. How else can you be creative and refreshingly new after over 50 years of the same classic shape. Just how can you deviate from it and give us a new refreshing look ?
Well said. I do struggle with too much crossover from their other models, mainly with interiors. I know it saves costs. It's expensive to create new interiors that are unique just the 911. Though years ago when I got my 2013 Boxster I'll admit I liked it was pretty much like my buddies 2013 911. I would like a different experience when I go from a Panamera to a 911 though .
Old 09-29-2018, 10:28 PM
  #2859  
dkhm3
Racer
 
dkhm3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Orange County
Posts: 435
Received 79 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

I wonder with the new 992 being e hybrid ready- will the non hybrid models be more heavy due to the reinforced chassis of the entire model line? I think the 991.2's gained weight from the 991.1 due to new turbo engines themselves. Any more weight from the 3300 lbs of the current 991.2's would not be welcome for a sports car.

Comparing the current hybrid nsx at almost 3,900 lbs- I hope Porsche doesn't make the 911 pigs.
Old 09-29-2018, 11:21 PM
  #2860  
mb1
Rennlist Member
 
mb1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,085
Received 195 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

"On the fence... still HATE the console, no handbrake, and electrical steering, and all the other GT/Panamera stuff added to 991. As of today, my next P-car would be a GT3 with rear seats added! As for 991, I have to drive one, see it on track and maybe get over the GT interior to maybe jump from 997 to 991."

That's a quote from a Rennlister from November 2011. Sound familiar? The more things change, the more they remain the same.
Old 09-30-2018, 12:45 AM
  #2861  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,294
Likes: 0
Received 10,711 Likes on 4,752 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by limegreen


If outright vehicle sales volume is how you measure success then absolutely, they are on fire.



LOL. How else would one define success for a publicly traded company?
Old 09-30-2018, 08:31 AM
  #2862  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,321
Received 1,542 Likes on 1,006 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HenryPcar
... It is getting to a point where Porsches are paranoid to deviate from its original 911 shape...
Getting to a point?
Getting?

You must be younger than the 911 by about 50%. If not you would remember the one time they attempted to be bold and re-invent themselves. It almost killed them because management became fractious.

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
LOL. How else would one define success for a publicly traded company?
Marginal Profitability times Sales Volume. Not just sales unless, you, like some, believe that if you’re losing money on each sale, you can make it up in volume...
Old 09-30-2018, 06:53 PM
  #2863  
DY369
Instructor
 
DY369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Marginal profitability? I thought it was just reported that Porsche came in second place (behind Ferrari) in terms of profit per car sold.
Old 09-30-2018, 07:27 PM
  #2864  
Ccpecot
Rennlist Member
 
Ccpecot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Johns Creek, GA
Posts: 261
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DY369
Marginal profitability? I thought it was just reported that Porsche came in second place (behind Ferrari) in terms of profit per car sold.
Correct with what I saw reported in several outlets. In 2017, Ferrari (90k/car) and Porsche (17K/car) had the highest profit per car in the industry.
Old 09-30-2018, 08:15 PM
  #2865  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,321
Received 1,542 Likes on 1,006 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DY369
Marginal profitability? I thought it was just reported that Porsche came in second place (behind Ferrari) in terms of profit per car sold.
Originally Posted by Ccpecot
Correct with what I saw reported in several outlets. In 2017, Ferrari (90k/car) and Porsche (17K/car) had the highest profit per car in the industry.
Correct. The term "marginal" in this context is the profit on the last unit. I should have written "average marginal profit" which would be the same as average profit per car. It is better in this context to use average profit-per-car and not (just) marginal profit. If the former is less than zero you're probably loosing money. But, if the latter is above zero then you may be able to make it up with more volume (next year) even if the former is negative.



Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2020 NEXT GENERATION 992 SPY PICS & RELEASE



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:16 AM.