992 - Underwhelming?
#31
Rennlist Member
#33
ZR1 or Z06, sure (though I still have zero interest)
#34
Race Car
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,486
Received 441 Likes
on
263 Posts
My .2 GT3 only with s proper 200cells exhaust shines compared to my M4 competition (M4 last version with carbon fiber transmission, has a brutal torque very funny but lacks on chassis capabilities)
The M4 comp its a 3liters twinturbo 450HP but the 992S (also 3liters 450HP ) feels way less torquey
i guess its the 992 exhaust that limit the breath capacity of its turbo engine
anyone already tested a less restrictive catalytic exhaust on the 992?
The M4 comp its a 3liters twinturbo 450HP but the 992S (also 3liters 450HP ) feels way less torquey
i guess its the 992 exhaust that limit the breath capacity of its turbo engine
anyone already tested a less restrictive catalytic exhaust on the 992?
#35
Burning Brakes
Wanted to love the M5 Comp, but...
Currently drive a 2016 Chevy / Holden SS 6MT. Wife has a 2019 CTT. Still love fast sedans, so I've spent the last few months test-driving every one that appealed to me, including a 2020 M5 Competition and AMG E63S. (Sadly, there aren't many left in the U.S. to choose from.)
Setting aside the ridiculous resale value of both (2016 models of either the AMG or M5 with 40,000 miles on them in good to excellent condition fetch a whopping $40K wholesale from an MSRP in the $110K range... mein Gott!), I was wholly disappointed in both of them. They were fast in a straight line and had nice interiors. The brake pedal on the BMW felt like it was stuffed in a marshmallow. The AMG had 20 miles on it and already had two annoying parcel shelf rattles. The BMW rode like a damned coal cart, even in the most comfort-oriented setting. It was so bad that I turned to the salesman and asked, "Hey man, is there something wrong here?" He looked nonplussed before answering no.
Neither car handled worth a damn. Lots of bounces and jounces in bumpy corners; steering felt disconnected and either annoyingly heavy or light. I couldn't tell what either end of either car was doing at any point in time.
Do my SUBJECTIVE impressions mean they're bad cars? Nope. But they don't hit my buttons right. Or at all. Had I fallen for one of them, I'd be buying a car with a lot more practicality for a lot less money, never mind the kick in the *** I'd take in four years selling it relative to a 911, which OBJECTIVELY smokes either of them in valuation over time. I work too hard for my money to just give it away if there's a better option.
In the end, came back around to our Porsche dealer, drove the C4S and C2S again, and said to myself, "That's it. This is the car. I'll compromise on size and practicality to experience this beautiful, connected, all-of-a-piece drive every day." It may not be the fastest or roomiest or best-looking or best-handling car out there. But the overall package is an utter gem. And I'll pay $40K more over the BMW or Merc because that's what I want.
To each his own. My point is, anybody can post subjective knocks to any damned thing he chooses. Doing so on a Porsche forum about a just-released Porsche 911 probably won't get you any helpful information, which may have been your whole point in creating this thread in the first place.
Setting aside the ridiculous resale value of both (2016 models of either the AMG or M5 with 40,000 miles on them in good to excellent condition fetch a whopping $40K wholesale from an MSRP in the $110K range... mein Gott!), I was wholly disappointed in both of them. They were fast in a straight line and had nice interiors. The brake pedal on the BMW felt like it was stuffed in a marshmallow. The AMG had 20 miles on it and already had two annoying parcel shelf rattles. The BMW rode like a damned coal cart, even in the most comfort-oriented setting. It was so bad that I turned to the salesman and asked, "Hey man, is there something wrong here?" He looked nonplussed before answering no.
Neither car handled worth a damn. Lots of bounces and jounces in bumpy corners; steering felt disconnected and either annoyingly heavy or light. I couldn't tell what either end of either car was doing at any point in time.
Do my SUBJECTIVE impressions mean they're bad cars? Nope. But they don't hit my buttons right. Or at all. Had I fallen for one of them, I'd be buying a car with a lot more practicality for a lot less money, never mind the kick in the *** I'd take in four years selling it relative to a 911, which OBJECTIVELY smokes either of them in valuation over time. I work too hard for my money to just give it away if there's a better option.
In the end, came back around to our Porsche dealer, drove the C4S and C2S again, and said to myself, "That's it. This is the car. I'll compromise on size and practicality to experience this beautiful, connected, all-of-a-piece drive every day." It may not be the fastest or roomiest or best-looking or best-handling car out there. But the overall package is an utter gem. And I'll pay $40K more over the BMW or Merc because that's what I want.
To each his own. My point is, anybody can post subjective knocks to any damned thing he chooses. Doing so on a Porsche forum about a just-released Porsche 911 probably won't get you any helpful information, which may have been your whole point in creating this thread in the first place.
The following users liked this post:
crimewave (02-01-2020)
#36
Nordschleife Master
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Destin, Nashville, In a 458 Challenge
Posts: 5,128
Received 905 Likes
on
532 Posts
Last week I finally got to drive the 992 Carrera S, it had all the right options for me, PDDC, Sport Package w/Chrono, Rear Axle Steer, etc.
Sadly, I was underwhelmed. I love the looks, but the power was lacking IMO. I have an M3 CS now that has gobs of on demand torque with minimal turbo lag. The 992 Carrera S did not have the torque I am looking for nor did't it provide that wow factor feeling and experience I want in my car. It also had noticeable turbo lag compared to my M3 CS.
I'm bummed about it, I want to love the 992, but the Carrera S didn't do it for me.
Has anyone else experienced this in the Carrera S? Do you think the Turbo or Turbo S would provide the wow factor I want? What about the GT3?
Thoughts?
Sadly, I was underwhelmed. I love the looks, but the power was lacking IMO. I have an M3 CS now that has gobs of on demand torque with minimal turbo lag. The 992 Carrera S did not have the torque I am looking for nor did't it provide that wow factor feeling and experience I want in my car. It also had noticeable turbo lag compared to my M3 CS.
I'm bummed about it, I want to love the 992, but the Carrera S didn't do it for me.
Has anyone else experienced this in the Carrera S? Do you think the Turbo or Turbo S would provide the wow factor I want? What about the GT3?
Thoughts?
Kind of joking, but kind of not. I had 17 F80 M3 Competition Package and that cars was the single biggest piece of Euro trash I have ever owned. There was really nothing redeemable about that car. Compared to a 911, the seating position feels like driving a tractor, horrible damping, crap steering and brake feel, very sketchy at or near the limits, traction control that is either nonexistent (wheels spinning) and retards acceleration too much (usually happens when pulling into traffic and needing power), dang near comical sound and they are really just not that attractive.
The M3 may feel like you are accelerating and going fast because it is basically a riced out family sedan with a bunch of bolt ons that is super sketchy and poor quality.
992, and 991 and 997.2s for that matter, are by far better quality and more enjoyable driving experience that any F8X platform. 911s are well built, finely tuned, well balanced
#37
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA area
Posts: 7,295
Received 2,125 Likes
on
1,341 Posts
Only read first post so far.... BUY A TURBO S and stop messing around..
if that doesn't do it for your Torque needs, maybe I can tell you about my modded Diesel days and you can go that route. My last one put down 1700 Ft. lbs. to the wheels.
if that doesn't do it for your Torque needs, maybe I can tell you about my modded Diesel days and you can go that route. My last one put down 1700 Ft. lbs. to the wheels.
The following users liked this post:
chance6 (02-01-2020)
#39
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA area
Posts: 7,295
Received 2,125 Likes
on
1,341 Posts
#40
Great feedback. You guys are killing me, just because I wasn't wow'd by the Carrera S you that think I am a "troll", or mistakenly didn't drive a 992, too funny. I am going to take vic55's advice and go for a second test drive, and also drive a 991.2 Turbo and a GT3 (if I can find a dealer with one). Obviously, the M3 CS is not the best car, but it's not trash, it's still a fun car for the price point. Maybe I'll just get a modded diesel like Big Swole suggested LOL.
The following users liked this post:
Xaverius (02-01-2020)
#41
Great feedback. You guys are killing me, just because I wasn't wow'd by the Carrera S you that think I am a "troll", or mistakenly didn't drive a 992, too funny. I am going to take vic55's advice and go for a second test drive, and also drive a 991.2 Turbo and a GT3 (if I can find a dealer with one). Obviously, the M3 CS is not the best car, but it's not trash, it's still a fun car for the price point. Maybe I'll just get a modded diesel like Big Swole suggested LOL.
I'm thinking you may have gone into the test drive with unrealistically high expectations and the C2S did not live up to what you were expecting.
The C2S is plenty fast - it definitely gives enough of that acceleration buzz, but there is so much more to the experience than that. It's all that other stuff that I'd pay attention to. The feel of the steering, the chassis, the body control - the way it moves is in another league from BMW. Not to mention it looks awesome and the fit/finish/design is a lot better.
I agree with all the criticism the M5 has gotten in this thread. I bought it as a family truckster that hauls ***. Mission accomplished. I just got bored of driving a car like that.
The following users liked this post:
DallasVP17 (02-01-2020)
#42
Three Wheelin'
Great feedback. You guys are killing me, just because I wasn't wow'd by the Carrera S you that think I am a "troll", or mistakenly didn't drive a 992, too funny. I am going to take vic55's advice and go for a second test drive, and also drive a 991.2 Turbo and a GT3 (if I can find a dealer with one). Obviously, the M3 CS is not the best car, but it's not trash, it's still a fun car for the price point. Maybe I'll just get a modded diesel like Big Swole suggested LOL.
I mean you pretty much walked into this criticism with your choice of the word.. underwhelming. Compound with a comparison to the M3 ... all a bit dramatic.. If you watched any of the two videos I linked before, it's clear this car is anything but UNDERWHELMING....
#43
Nordschleife Master
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Destin, Nashville, In a 458 Challenge
Posts: 5,128
Received 905 Likes
on
532 Posts
People are being too harsh, tbh. The M3 CS is far from trash. It's a fast car and very capable. Actually, I think the CS is a sharp looking car.
I'm thinking you may have gone into the test drive with unrealistically high expectations and the C2S did not live up to what you were expecting.
The C2S is plenty fast - it definitely gives enough of that acceleration buzz, but there is so much more to the experience than that. It's all that other stuff that I'd pay attention to. The feel of the steering, the chassis, the body control - the way it moves is in another league from BMW. Not to mention it looks awesome and the fit/finish/design is a lot better.
I agree with all the criticism the M5 has gotten in this thread. I bought it as a family truckster that hauls ***. Mission accomplished. I just got bored of driving a car like that.
I'm thinking you may have gone into the test drive with unrealistically high expectations and the C2S did not live up to what you were expecting.
The C2S is plenty fast - it definitely gives enough of that acceleration buzz, but there is so much more to the experience than that. It's all that other stuff that I'd pay attention to. The feel of the steering, the chassis, the body control - the way it moves is in another league from BMW. Not to mention it looks awesome and the fit/finish/design is a lot better.
I agree with all the criticism the M5 has gotten in this thread. I bought it as a family truckster that hauls ***. Mission accomplished. I just got bored of driving a car like that.
Mine F80 M3 Competition Package sat in the garage for months at a time without being driven because I never wanted to drive it compared to my other cars. I couldn't sell it either. The F80 market is pitiful. I tried to trade it at one point, but couldn't because of stop sale due to faulty driveshaft. Stop sale lasted 6 months because there was no replacement part.
The best offer on my 2 1/2 year old $80k sticker M3 Manual Competition was $42k. I had it listed at $45k for 6 months and low $50s for about a year.
No one buys a 911 for drag race speed. Non-"Turbo" non-GT2/3s have never been about that. They are about being a complete package with amazing handling and ride, great looks, great seating position, comfortable and easy to use daily drivers, nice interiors, reliability and cheap maintenance and operating costs compared to other high-end sports cars.
I have driven new turbos purchased every 2 or 3 years since 1989 as my daily drivers, except I just dumped my 991.2 Turbo in October and went backwards to a 2012 997.2 GTS which I like better. I, however, am purchasing the 992 Turbo. I had the 997.2 GTS and the M3 at the same time. I drove the M3 maybe twice in 2+ months even after going to the 997.2 GTS. The GTS has plenty of performance for the street and is much more enjoyable to drive . . . or I would take the DB11.
Even my wife hated the M3. She drives a Macan S and Gallardo Spyder so she likes performance stuff as well.
Last edited by Doug H; 02-01-2020 at 07:28 PM.
#44
No brother, it was complete trash. Maybe I just have higher standards and expectations from driving better cars, but F80 M3 was a huge disappointment. Mine just sat in the garage for months at a time without being driven because I never wanted to drive it compared to my other cars. I couldn't sell it either. The F80 market is pitiful. I tried to trade it at one point, but couldn't because of stop sale due to faulty driveshaft they didn't have a replacement part for 6 months. The best offer on my 2 1/2 year old $80k sticker M3 Competition Package was $42k and I had it listed at $45k for 6 months and low $50s for about a year.
#45
Nordschleife Master
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Destin, Nashville, In a 458 Challenge
Posts: 5,128
Received 905 Likes
on
532 Posts
Absolutely horrible customer service. This is perhaps because they are super high volume and most of their customers are cheap 3s and etc. I was trying to see if I could even get payoffs from the dealer back then and no one at my dealership would answer the phone. The receptionist kept sending me to different voice mails for service, parts, finance manager, sales manager, general sales manager. I literally jumped into my car and drove 30 minutes one way, walked into the dealership and it was DEAD. Everyone was just standing around, but no one would answer the phone. This happened to me twice.