Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C&D - Instrumented Test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2019, 11:59 AM
  #16  
TheStanman
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheStanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 428
Received 183 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by not4one
Wait, aren't the "5-60", and the "0-60 with one foot of rollout" two different things? And isn't 5-60, simply 5-60 (i.e accelerating from a constant 5, then flooring it up to 60, without a so-called rollout)? Either wires are crossed here, or I'm totally confused, which is entirely possible.
Yes they are different things. Your description is how I understand it. With 5 - 60 you can't use LC.

I believe the big difference between 0 - 60 times and 5 - 60 times are mostly due to launch control rather than turbo lag. There was a big difference in those times for the NA 991.1 too.

The reason there isn't a big gap for the Corvette is probably because it doesn't have a good LC to use for the 0 - 60.
Old 07-15-2019, 12:26 AM
  #17  
Valvefloat991
Burning Brakes
 
Valvefloat991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 117 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheStanman
Yes they are different things. Your description is how I understand it. With 5 - 60 you can't use LC.

I believe the big difference between 0 - 60 times and 5 - 60 times are mostly due to launch control rather than turbo lag. There was a big difference in those times for the NA 991.1 too.

The reason there isn't a big gap for the Corvette is probably because it doesn't have a good LC to use for the 0 - 60.
The big differences in turbocharged car times between 0-60 and 5-60 rolling start existed before launch control was available. The launch control on Porsche's is typically worth about two tenths. The difference between 0-60 and 5-60 is often over a full second.
Old 07-15-2019, 12:38 AM
  #18  
TheStanman
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheStanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 428
Received 183 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Valvefloat991
The big differences in turbocharged car times between 0-60 and 5-60 rolling start existed before launch control was available. The launch control on Porsche's is typically worth about two tenths. The difference between 0-60 and 5-60 is often over a full second.
Weren't turbo engines before launch control much different than modern turbo engines?

Regardless, the NA 991.1 had a similar gap between 0 - 60 (4.2 sec) and 5 - 60 (5.3 sec) according to Car and Driver's test. So at least for the 911, it doesn't seem to be turbo related.
Old 07-15-2019, 09:45 AM
  #19  
Hurricane
Race Car
 
Hurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,373
Received 653 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheStanman
Car and Driver posted their instrumented test of the 992. Good performance all around.

C/D TEST RESULTS
Zero to 60 mph: 3.0 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 7.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 12.4 sec
Rolling start, 5–60 mph: 4.2 sec
Top gear, 30–50 mph: 2.2 sec
Top gear, 50–70 mph: 2.6 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 11.3 sec @ 125 mph
Top speed (drag limited, mfr's claim): 191 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 140 ft
Pretty much identical to the 911.2 GTS numbers, which I suppose shouldn't be surprising. Very nice!

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 3.0 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 7.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 12.2 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 17.4 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 3.8 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.4 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 2.5 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 11.3 sec @ 125 mph
Top speed (drag limited, mfr's claim): 193 mph

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...c-test-review/

Braking, 70-0 mph: 142 ft
The following users liked this post:
G650 (07-16-2019)



Quick Reply: C&D - Instrumented Test



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:34 AM.