Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

HOT FOR SALE: Pick of the Week 991

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2017, 04:54 PM
  #10156  
WGJP 993
Racer
 
WGJP 993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 274
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hurricane
PASM lowers the car by 10mm and sport PASM another 10 mm, not 5mm each.
How difficult is it to navigate with SPASM in the city - driveways, dips, etc? Is it something you constantly have to be cautious about - or wish you had an axle lift - or it is pretty manageable? I've not driven a 991 with SPASM.

Also, does that make it about the same height as the X73 sport suspension?

Thanks.
Old 05-05-2017, 05:50 PM
  #10157  
STG
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Attachment 1162262

Here's my take on the pre-owned 991.1 market and strong values the last 12-16 months.

There is no ONE single explanation for it, but more a combination of a few factors. I'll go order them in no specific order or weight placed on them.

Fact number one: Demand has to be greater than supply for rising prices.

This is probably the first time I can think of that a .1 will go down as more desirable than a .2 generational version.

From my observations there have been few .1 owners trading into a .2. 991.1 owners are staying put. They don't see a reason to move into anything else. There is nothing else at these price points that even come close. Trade into a .2?? Why? No clear benefit and pay more for less? Less as far as the the desirability of the NA experience for many. There clearly is a love for it. No debate here, just a clear preference for many owners.

991.2 sales have been flat and slightly lower coming from the 991.1. Clearly says something. You'd expect a bump with a refresh. A lot of new and "first time" 911 owners fall into this group along with habitual lease buyers. With great economic times and disposable income, you'd expect the 991.2 to be doing better.

Porsche has tightened up sports cars allocations to not flood the market and support higher resale numbers. Higher resale numbers help support new high MSRP sales. Porsche doesn't like discounting either. They learned a lesson with overproducing Turbo S's, Panameras, etc. which we're seeing big discounts new just to move them. Those days are done. This will help 991.1 values as well.

The 718 going 4cy and turbo has been a HUGE sales challenge. Off to a very rough start. I'd say very concerning and a mistake on their part. Way too expensive for a 4 banger and many other options new and pre-owned in that price segment. The 991.1 looks pretty attractive to potential buyers here doesn't it??

Great economic times have also surged many buyers into the $80-$100K market moving up from Audi, BMW, etc. These guys aren't buyers in the $120K-$135K+++ 991.2 range. Getting a 991.1 in great pre-owned shape at a $30K-$50K discount is very attractive isn't it?? These new guys come into Rennlist daily.

So there you have it. Few guys getting out of 991.1's, and a growing group of 991.1 potential buyers and lurkers coming into the market at a higher rate than those getting out causes lower inventory and one that turns over quickly at higher prices.

Then we have a resource like Hot for Sale. As much good as we do, I believe it's brought great attention and a venue for the 991.1's. You can clearly get educated and see the great appeal for what you're getting at these prices. With well over 1,000,000 views in just over 2 years, that's a lot of contributors and lurkers. Like 2K hits a day for a 991.1 S/4S/GTS/Targa market with around 600 cars currently for sale. That's an estimate based on my searches. This is not including base model Carreras. It's a great advertising and promotional tool for the market. More visibility and desirability. Does someone like Porsche North America like attention being made to the "deals" and "deprecation" made here?? Absolutely not. Do they like hearing prices and stable and higher than a year ago? You bet.

Well, that's my take. Not everyone will agree with me of course. All these thoughts have been going through my head. Hopefully I presented them well. Was never a thesis kinda guy. Like I said, more like all the right conditions for a perfect storm.

What happens going forward?? Can't say for sure. My predictions.......

Deprecation will slow down for sure. Have values bottomed out?? No. We're just in a unique time here. The gap between the 15's, 16's, and GTS's will get closer to the 2012.5-2014's. The GTS's will always be above the pack. I think the following for the last naturally aspirated Carrera will always be strong. The 991.2's will be orphans wedged between the 991.1 and 992. Many 991.1 guys will be tempted by the GT cars. I think there will be NA options there well into the next 992 generation.

Enjoy your cars guys, and for those searching don't give up. Your car is out there. Might take a little longer to find than a year ago!

Attachment 1162264Attachment 1162265

Last edited by STG; 05-05-2017 at 06:09 PM.
Old 05-05-2017, 06:24 PM
  #10158  
visitador
Rennlist Member
 
visitador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,756
Received 144 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

^^^ nice analysis, specially the 718 argument. I wasn't even thinking of 718 cars. If I went the Cayman way, I would have been looking at pre-owned 981. Four cylinders for a $70k plus car? May as well go Jaguar F type.
Old 05-05-2017, 06:29 PM
  #10159  
STG
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

More like up to $100K for a 4 cylinder

Attachment 1162276
Old 05-05-2017, 06:32 PM
  #10160  
j997tt
Advanced
 
j997tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 74
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very nice analysis above. Glad I bought when I did...
Old 05-05-2017, 06:32 PM
  #10161  
TerryC4S
Instructor
 
TerryC4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Posts: 174
Received 71 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

^^^ I agree with the analysis as well. Also, If you're looking at a 991.2, why not wait a bit as there will be some smoking deals on the lots if they don't move them this summer. I did this with the Macan Turbo. I know it's not the same as a 911 but I picked mine up in late December 2015 as a leftover model for a huge discount off list. We may see the same with .2s in the September/October timeframe. I won't be tempted though. If I pick up anything else, it will be a 987 Spyder or Cayman R. Of course I have to convince the wife that I need the 991 as well.
Old 05-05-2017, 06:32 PM
  #10162  
Hurricane
Race Car
 
Hurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,373
Received 653 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WGJP 993
How difficult is it to navigate with SPASM in the city - driveways, dips, etc? Is it something you constantly have to be cautious about - or wish you had an axle lift - or it is pretty manageable? I've not driven a 991 with SPASM.

Also, does that make it about the same height as the X73 sport suspension?

Thanks.
I have owned two 991S's - one with PASM and my current one with SPASM. With my PASM car (owned for over two years), it never scraped. Not once.

With my SPASM car, I have to leave my driveway at a 45 degree angle and pull out very slowly not to scrape. In nine months of ownership (yikes - have I had it that long already!) and 4,500 miles of driving, I have scraped it exactly one other time than my driveway. I was in a very small town going down a steep hill to a stop sign and it the road did a terrible job of leveling off to the intersection.

So I have thought about the need for a front axle lift (not available on the 991.1 base, S, or GTS BTW) if I ever bought a 991.2 some day. But if it is only my driveway (which I can mitigate by taking at an angle), then it really isn't worth the expense. Plus I can always replace the lip some day (it actually looks fine on my car).

SPASM is a stiffer ride than the PASM, no doubt, but I still find it very comfortable on long trips. I don't even notice the stiffness over PASM anymore but then again I have been driving it for a long time. The lowered ride height is nice and I use the sport chassis settings for autocross (otherwise it is always in normal). I should also state that I had PDCC on both of my cars, too, which may have increased ride comfort over non-PDCC equipped cars.
Old 05-05-2017, 06:45 PM
  #10163  
Hurricane
Race Car
 
Hurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,373
Received 653 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Very good read, STG. The 991.2 is nice and I have no problem with the turbocharged engine or more power (yay, more power! And torque!) but it just isn't that great of an upgrade over the 991.1 to make someone like me suddenly desire it over what I already have.

The telematics and ergonomics aren't that great of a change (except for Apple CarPlay and maybe better maps, a nicer steering wheel and a very slightly larger center console storage area, the interior is identical. No 2017 Panamera interior that the upcoming 992 will probably have. The changes to the front and rear exterior - they are okay but in many ways I prefer the simpler, clean look of the 991.1 over the changes. The HP bump is minimal. The torque increase is nice (and the acceleration gains) but at the sacrifice of the great sound of the NA engine. RWS is a nice option but also not essential for many buyers.

The other thing is that a new 991.2 competes against CPO 991.1 Turbos and Turbo S's, price wise, more than 991.1's. I think I would rather have a CPO Turbo or Turbo S with low miles and far more power than a new 991.2S or GTS...

Plus, the 991.1 engines have been really reliable (the COV issues were present but fixable). With the 997.1 to 997.2, if I am not mistaken, you moved up to a much more reliable engine and the PDK from the Tiptronic? That alone would make the 997.2's a LOT more desirable over a 997.1.
Old 05-05-2017, 06:46 PM
  #10164  
Hurricane
Race Car
 
Hurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,373
Received 653 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by visitador
^^^ nice analysis, specially the 718 argument. I wasn't even thinking of 718 cars. If I went the Cayman way, I would have been looking at pre-owned 981. Four cylinders for a $70k plus car? May as well go Jaguar F type.
Originally Posted by STG
More like up to $100K for a 4 cylinder

Attachment 1162276
Yeah, prices for Boxsters and Caymans have jumped quite a bit over the past few years...and I would find a 991.1 much more desirable than a 718...
Old 05-05-2017, 06:52 PM
  #10165  
STG
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hurricane
Very good read, STG.


Plus, the 991.1 engines have been really reliable (the COV issues were present but fixable). With the 997.1 to 997.2, if I am not mistaken, you moved up to a much more reliable engine and the PDK from the Tiptronic? That alone would make the 997.2's a LOT more desirable over a 997.1.
Thanks.

As a side note, to clarify for some. The COV's (change over valves) and just small electronic switches that plug in. Not mechanical in any way.

Your 997.1 to 997.2 example is a good one. A good example of my comment that the 991.1 will be the favorite child of the 991 generation which will be unique as all .2's have been favored on most models.
Old 05-05-2017, 07:07 PM
  #10166  
visitador
Rennlist Member
 
visitador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,756
Received 144 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
Thanks.

As a side note, to clarify for some. The COV's (change over valves) and just small electronic switches that plug in. Not mechanical in any way.

.
One of those things that a PPI can't check. On the flip side, easy to fix...

https://rennlist.com/forums/991/8002...-on-991-a.html
Old 05-05-2017, 07:41 PM
  #10167  
MarcoB
Intermediate
 
MarcoB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 36
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hurricane
I have owned two 991S's - one with PASM and my current one with SPASM. With my PASM car (owned for over two years), it never scraped. Not once.

With my SPASM car, I have to leave my driveway at a 45 degree angle and pull out very slowly not to scrape. In nine months of ownership (yikes - have I had it that long already!) and 4,500 miles of driving, I have scraped it exactly one other time than my driveway. I was in a very small town going down a steep hill to a stop sign and it the road did a terrible job of leveling off to the intersection.

So I have thought about the need for a front axle lift (not available on the 991.1 base, S, or GTS BTW) if I ever bought a 991.2 some day. But if it is only my driveway (which I can mitigate by taking at an angle), then it really isn't worth the expense. Plus I can always replace the lip some day (it actually looks fine on my car).

SPASM is a stiffer ride than the PASM, no doubt, but I still find it very comfortable on long trips. I don't even notice the stiffness over PASM anymore but then again I have been driving it for a long time. The lowered ride height is nice and I use the sport chassis settings for autocross (otherwise it is always in normal). I should also state that I had PDCC on both of my cars, too, which may have increased ride comfort over non-PDCC equipped cars.
Daily spoiler scrapes with my SPASM Coupe, unfortunately - steep driveway at our townhouse, and another steep Downtown parking garage ramp at work. No wonder the PO included an extra front spoiler - seems to be wear item! Stiff ride for sure on the crappy Seattle streets, but would not trade for a PASM ride - love the cornering capability!

Last edited by dr bob; 05-06-2017 at 12:05 AM. Reason: Fixed a missing quote bracket...
Old 05-05-2017, 08:24 PM
  #10168  
visitador
Rennlist Member
 
visitador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,756
Received 144 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
More like up to $100K for a 4 cylinder

Attachment 1162276
Crazy. Who wants a $100K+ 4-cylinder Cayman. In the realms of super cars, the only 4-cylinder that I ever remember was a Lotus Esprit. And that was a flop
Old 05-05-2017, 08:31 PM
  #10169  
STG
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Porsche is making cars for China and hoping we get duped into it by slick videos. Little did they know ... The only damn new cars the enthusiasts want are the GT's, and we all know the allocation and mark up drama game there.
Old 05-05-2017, 08:56 PM
  #10170  
STG
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Interesting car. No SC though. Bizarre. At their Audi dealer. They also have a Porsche dealer. Less than 6K miles!

Looks like a little brother of Hurricane's car!

Attachment 1162315Attachment 1162314Attachment 1162316Attachment 1162320Attachment 1162319Attachment 1162318Attachment 1162321Attachment 1162317

http://www.auditacoma.com/used/Porsc...359da8f2f6.htm

WP0AB2A90ES120531


Quick Reply: HOT FOR SALE: Pick of the Week 991



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:04 AM.