Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Not that we should care but, 997 guys are ?

Old 10-09-2012, 07:36 PM
  #91  
solomonschris
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
solomonschris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Fine
Old 10-09-2012, 08:28 PM
  #92  
chuckbdc
Race Car
 
chuckbdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 3,556
Received 309 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
The mechanical connection between car and driver was a huge improvement with the 997 - shifter, brakes, seats, and steering were all changed for the better from the 996, making the car more focused, and with the upgraded interior, at the same time a nicer place to be (and with the wider rear fenders and revised front end, nicer to look at as well).

The 991 has removed some of the mechanical connection, while (IMO, of course) going overboard 'upgrading' the interior (I already have a luxury car), and I can't get over the proportions of the wider front end.

Up until now, if you were faster in a 911, it was because you were a better driver - not because you ticked all of the option boxes for electronic driving aids.

I do not think the outgoing 997 was perfect, and the 991 is obviously more capable, but like am722 and others, the C2 and C2S have evolved into cars I do not want to own. Hopefully we will see a GTS or Club Sport version sooner than later - or a GT3 with AeroKit delete option. Or maybe Porsche's plan is to make the Cayman more of a pure drivers' car.
Yawn.
Old 10-09-2012, 08:30 PM
  #93  
wanna911
Race Car
 
wanna911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: With A Manual Transmission
Posts: 4,728
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
The mechanical connection between car and driver was a huge improvement with the 997 - shifter, brakes, seats, and steering were all changed for the better from the 996, making the car more focused, and with the upgraded interior, at the same time a nicer place to be (and with the wider rear fenders and revised front end, nicer to look at as well).

The 991 has removed some of the mechanical connection, while (IMO, of course) going overboard 'upgrading' the interior (I already have a luxury car), and I can't get over the proportions of the wider front end.

Up until now, if you were faster in a 911, it was because you were a better driver - not because you ticked all of the option boxes for electronic driving aids.

I do not think the outgoing 997 was perfect, and the 991 is obviously more capable, but like am722 and others, the C2 and C2S have evolved into cars I do not want to own. Hopefully we will see a GTS or Club Sport version sooner than later - or a GT3 with AeroKit delete option. Or maybe Porsche's plan is to make the Cayman more of a pure drivers' car.
Sorry disagree, while the 997 is more refined and a tad more precise, it does not match the 996 (gt3) specifically in terms of rawness, tossability and communication. That was lost with addition of psm and a lot more weight and softness.
Old 10-09-2012, 08:46 PM
  #94  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,270
Received 259 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

The 996 GT3 was absolutely more raw (although it was PASM, not PSM, that was introduced on the 997 GT3 that made it softer, which I acknowledged a few posts back), however I specifically referred to the C2 and C2S, as this is not the GT3 forum.

The 997 Carrera was not significantly heavier than the 996, and in my experience you had to be hamfisted on a wet racetrack to get PSM to intervene.
Old 10-10-2012, 09:25 AM
  #95  
holminator
Burning Brakes
 
holminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
The mechanical connection between car and driver was a huge improvement with the 997 - shifter, brakes, seats, and steering were all changed for the better from the 996, making the car more focused, and with the upgraded interior, at the same time a nicer place to be (and with the wider rear fenders and revised front end, nicer to look at as well).

The 991 has removed some of the mechanical connection, while (IMO, of course) going overboard 'upgrading' the interior (I already have a luxury car), and I can't get over the proportions of the wider front end.

Up until now, if you were faster in a 911, it was because you were a better driver - not because you ticked all of the option boxes for electronic driving aids.

I do not think the outgoing 997 was perfect, and the 991 is obviously more capable, but like am722 and others, the C2 and C2S have evolved into cars I do not want to own. Hopefully we will see a GTS or Club Sport version sooner than later - or a GT3 with AeroKit delete option. Or maybe Porsche's plan is to make the Cayman more of a pure drivers' car.
It's like I stepped into a time machine and went back to late 2005 when I brought home my 997. Many 996 owners said the same thing about the 997's variable ratio steering and PASM. And yet here we are again, folks. Some things change and some things never do. I certainly enjoy reading the complaints though. Very funny.
Old 10-10-2012, 11:45 AM
  #96  
deturney
Instructor
 
deturney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am going to sell my 991S and find a nice '63 Beetle, I just hate what they have done with the bumper styling on the 991. And the 991 back window is all wrong: no wonder you can't put an actual person in the back seat, let alone two. My Beetle will not have a stupid radio, who needs that distraction? Tires cost about $50.00 a piece instead of millions and I can easily tell when they need air just by looking at them. I can do all of my own repairs and the darn thing won't even need an oil filter, way ahead of it's time there! Yep, that's what I am going to do, find me a nice Beetle before this things goes out of warranty and ruins my retirement.

Obviously the Beetle is a far superior design! Why do they always have to go and screw things up.
Old 10-10-2012, 12:55 PM
  #97  
SSST
Drifting
 
SSST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bastrop By God Texas
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wanna911
in fact, the 997 Turbo S with PDK is still barely faster than the 991 C2S. So it's NOT just PDK.
From an acceleration perspective, the 997 Turbo S is a full second faster to 60. That's about 25% quicker, which is significant IMO.

I saw one test that clocked a 0-60 time of 2.8 in a 997 TTS.

The 991S might have a handling edge on the 997TTS, but it won't out run it.
Old 10-10-2012, 01:04 PM
  #98  
holminator
Burning Brakes
 
holminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by deturney
I am going to sell my 991S and find a nice '63 Beetle, I just hate what they have done with the bumper styling on the 991. And the 991 back window is all wrong: no wonder you can't put an actual person in the back seat, let alone two. My Beetle will not have a stupid radio, who needs that distraction? Tires cost about $50.00 a piece instead of millions and I can easily tell when they need air just by looking at them. I can do all of my own repairs and the darn thing won't even need an oil filter, way ahead of it's time there! Yep, that's what I am going to do, find me a nice Beetle before this things goes out of warranty and ruins my retirement.

Obviously the Beetle is a far superior design! Why do they always have to go and screw things up.
Me too, except I'm going to hang a little troll from my rearview mirror.
Old 10-10-2012, 01:13 PM
  #99  
Targa Tim
Rennlist Member
 
Targa Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,878
Received 76 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

I did not bother reading all the replies.

I don't have anything bad to say about 991, as it is a great 911. I do not mind having one, just don't feel like it is worth me trading in club coupe and lots of cash for it. Not worth the price as club coupe has everything that I need for street driving.

Besides, I have a .2GT3RS. So basically no cars in the 991 lineup has interested me yet.
Old 10-10-2012, 01:40 PM
  #100  
chuckbdc
Race Car
 
chuckbdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 3,556
Received 309 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by holminator
Me too, except I'm going to hang a little troll from my rearview mirror.
Has the troll been posting here?
Old 10-10-2012, 02:56 PM
  #101  
LewisB
Instructor
 
LewisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SSST
From an acceleration perspective, the 997 Turbo S is a full second faster to 60. That's about 25% quicker, which is significant IMO.

I saw one test that clocked a 0-60 time of 2.8 in a 997 TTS.

The 991S might have a handling edge on the 997TTS, but it won't out run it.


We're also talking about 130 bhp and 191lb-ft more torque more in the TTS than in the 991Carrerra S. That's a lot of difference.

Amazing to see how the new Porsche owners are impressed that their cars went round the ring faster then the 997 GT3...and just 20 sec slower than the 918. That doesn't mean its a better car! Get in the 997GT3 or a 997TTS and give it a spin. I bet you'd wish you had one of these 997s.
Old 10-10-2012, 03:54 PM
  #102  
chuckbdc
Race Car
 
chuckbdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 3,556
Received 309 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Here is a video that gets at some of the issues discussed here (besides being a neat watch).

http://www.dpccars.com/car-videos-12...-Carrera-S.htm

Natch it confirms all of my opinions, predudices etc. Now we need a similar comparison of my favorate sports car, (991 S Sport PASM without PDCC) and your favorate "real" sports car!
Old 10-10-2012, 08:12 PM
  #103  
deturney
Instructor
 
deturney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Targa Tim
I did not bother reading all the replies.

I don't have anything bad to say about 991, as it is a great 911. I do not mind having one, just don't feel like it is worth me trading in club coupe and lots of cash for it. Not worth the price as club coupe has everything that I need for street driving.

Besides, I have a .2GT3RS. So basically no cars in the 991 lineup has interested me yet.
If I had one of those (or almost any other 911) I wouldn't buy a new one either. In a few years my 991S will be an old design but I intend to keep it up and enjoy it for a long time.
Old 10-10-2012, 09:04 PM
  #104  
holminator
Burning Brakes
 
holminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Outstanding video. Thanks!
Old 10-10-2012, 09:13 PM
  #105  
fbroen
Three Wheelin'
 
fbroen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,456
Received 229 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

About the video -- I would be interested to see a PDCC and non-PDCC comparison. "We THINK the understeer comes from the PDCC" is not terribly convincing.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Not that we should care but, 997 guys are ?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:50 PM.