Question on KW H.A.S. kit for 991.2 GTS
#16
Three Wheelin'
Centerlocking wheels have no impact on suspension fitment. If you want to "slam" the car then get actual coilovers. KW HAS kit does have height adjustability.
Are you sure about that? Do CL and 5 lug rims have the same wheel offsets? If they dont, then yes it does have an impact.
I do not suggest HR springs or KW has kit. Ive had both. One was way too soft and slammed the car. The KW HAS kit was nice. But very firm and rebound was too firm for my liking. I felt my car was planted MUCH better in stock form at HIGH speeds. Sure it cornered better daily driving with either of those solutions. But track speed wise, I felt the car handled worse!
Id either buy proper coil over setup (not a sleeve kit that slams your stock struts) or keep it stock in my opinion.
#18
Rennlist Member
#19
Rennlist Member
https://tractivesuspension.com/history/
#22
Rennlist Member
KW call out on the website “NOT FOR CL” wheels on the 991.2. Speculation is that the wheel offsets may result in contact between the wheel/tire and HAS kit. I dont recall anyone reporting that they had successfully installed on a 991.2 with CLs. Thanks
#24
Rennlist Member
I recall a similar post where someone with a .1 GTS w/CLs installed the kit. I have been keeping my eyes open for someone reporting that they fit a .2 GTS w/CL’s. If you happen to find the post I would be very happy to be proven wrong. Thanks
#25
Rennlist Member
so we still don't know if the KW H.A.S kit will fit CL cars besides what KW says, btw KW USA has been very flaky with fitment information.
I have a #25371063 up on market place and someone else asked me about CL fitment too.
I have a #25371063 up on market place and someone else asked me about CL fitment too.
#26
Rennlist Member
I’ve started to do my own research and I think the issue is the front suspension perch clearance to the CL’s. The center locks have 6mm less clearance (based on size and offsets) so I got under my GTS w/CLs to take a look. Dang! I was really surprised to find out how close the spring perch was to my tire on a stock car. I could not get my pinky between them so it’s only a few mm’s. Although the back is recessed more due to size and offset it looks like there is loads of room left.
So it looks like it’s a clearance issue with the CL’s, that is if my assumption than the suspension is the same. Anyone know if this is correct?
The bottom line is that I want to lower my car to GT3 stance, so roughly half an inch. From what I have read and also direct feed back is that the Techart springs are good and the ride height is nice but the ride quality is somewhat impaired. I’m not surprised but hey I want the look and the retain the SPASM ride quality.
I think the KW HAS might offer the best chance for a non coil over swap (over Techart, H&R) as it appears they have helper springs as per website pics. So I’m thinking about being the guinea pig (clarification, no harm will come to any animals) and ordering up the kit and seeing if it will fit. My secret weapon is to install bottom adjustable arms to gain track, should easily get the 6mm back that is lost with the CL’s.
However what about the total package and cost. I’m thinking that a DSC unit would be a nice compliment. So if I add up the springs, DSC, adjustable arms and alignment it’s probably running close to $4K. That got my thinking about coil overs that could still retain the electronics like the tractive units. Now that will come in around $7K so it’s quite a bit more but is It worth extra money?
I think I will start another thread for coil over discussion / advice but let’s keep this one going for the spring debate.
Cheers
#27
BGB guy I think his name is John.. Did not like/suggest the H&R VTF. I asked him and he said he'd go with the KW's.
I spoke with KW directly and they were going to sell me a set for the GTS at a much higher price than advertised.
TAG was going to sell me a set for roughly $1200 shipped during a sale they had on KW products.
I've become reluctant to mess with the OEM suspension/geometry.
Also ran H&R springs on my C4S. Did not like.
I spoke with KW directly and they were going to sell me a set for the GTS at a much higher price than advertised.
TAG was going to sell me a set for roughly $1200 shipped during a sale they had on KW products.
I've become reluctant to mess with the OEM suspension/geometry.
Also ran H&R springs on my C4S. Did not like.
I definitely wouldn’t mess with it on a gts or any 991 with spasm, the performance and ride height are excellent.
#28
Rennlist Member
I totally agree that the SPASM performance is excellent but the ride height is subjective. I have lived with my car for 1 year now and my own personal preference is to lower it to GT3 stance. I have been hesitant to do it earlier as I don’t want a loss in performance, however the worst that can happen is that I learn an expensive lesson when I switch it back
#29
I totally agree that the SPASM performance is excellent but the ride height is subjective. I have lived with my car for 1 year now and my own personal preference is to lower it to GT3 stance. I have been hesitant to do it earlier as I don’t want a loss in performance, however the worst that can happen is that I learn an expensive lesson when I switch it back
my point is that any spring kit will ride and perform worse, no question. The damper length and valving is matched to the spring height and length.
Reducing ride height using springs only reduces the suspension travel and causes the dampers to work in a range they are not designed for. This doesn’t even take into account the various spring rates which are not at all matched to the dampers.
the suspension in these cars is so well tuned imo it is just really hard to justify changing it simply for looks while noticeably degrading the performance of the car.
i also have personal experience as my prior 991 S came with spasm but had H&R springs on it which were awful. Thankfully it also had the stock springs which I put on immediately.
imo if I HAD to have a lower suspension I would spend a lot more money on a comprehensive well designed kit with matching damper length and valving to accommodate shorter springs
#30
Rennlist Member
However what about the total package and cost. I’m thinking that a DSC unit would be a nice compliment. So if I add up the springs, DSC, adjustable arms and alignment it’s probably running close to $4K. That got my thinking about coil overs that could still retain the electronics like the tractive units. Now that will come in around $7K so it’s quite a bit more but is It worth extra money?