Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991ers who go track PSM On, Sport, or Off?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2019, 07:06 PM
  #16  
erko1905
Burning Brakes
 
erko1905's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 833
Received 86 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JSETarga
In previous cars (non 911s) I always drive on the track with partial stability control. I have taken my Targa 4 GTS to the track once now. I left PSM on and had car in sport plus and PDCC on. I never felt stability contol do anything or saw any lights. However, I wonder if my excessive brake pad wear had something to do with PSM. The last couple weeks since my track day, I have been putting PSM in sport. My goal is to see if and when I feel a difference when I do some spirited runs. I did one yesterday and not much to report. No negative effects. It felt a little loser overall though. I intend to try it next track day in sport.
Uneven brake pad wear could be PSM or PTV - so that's not entirely conclusive evidence to say you've been relying on PSM all the time.
Old 03-03-2019, 07:15 PM
  #17  
JSETarga
Burning Brakes
 
JSETarga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 973
Received 152 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by erko1905
Uneven brake pad wear could be PSM or PTV - so that's not entirely conclusive evidence to say you've been relying on PSM all the time.
Wear was even all around. Nothing funny about wear just seemed excessive. Ran a lot of long sessions and only 20-30 min between 30-40 min runs. I think a lot of it is just real hard abuse and sustained heat. Its just one of those things I would like to figure out as to not spend a boat load on pads all the time. Next track day should help determine. GM cars always flashed stability light when it kicked in and killed power on corner exit, which I did not feel at all. Often I would forget to change settings when starting a session and it was just obvious real quick when I forgot.
Old 03-03-2019, 07:35 PM
  #18  
erko1905
Burning Brakes
 
erko1905's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 833
Received 86 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JSETarga


Wear was even all around. Nothing funny about wear just seemed excessive. Ran a lot of long sessions and only 20-30 min between 30-40 min runs. I think a lot of it is just real hard abuse and sustained heat. Its just one of those things I would like to figure out as to not spend a boat load on pads all the time. Next track day should help determine. GM cars always flashed stability light when it kicked in and killed power on corner exit, which I did not feel at all. Often I would forget to change settings when starting a session and it was just obvious real quick when I forgot.
You're probably doing fine. There's no way to not spend a boatload for brakes and tires in this specific activity (or maybe I couldn't find it), I'd get that thought out of your head to avoid future frustration

On the pad wear subject, I usually monitor, the front vs back, and the left vs right rear.

Ideally if you're mostly out of the PSM, you should probably be going with 2 or maybe 3 pairs of fronts per each pair of rears. Having to replace front vs back at the same frequency is one indicator of things not going so well.

The rear, left vs right, that could be a PTV thing, especially if you're going to tracks that are the same direction (clockwise or counterclockwise) all the time or going to a specific track that has a lot more right turns vs left (or vice versa). My understanding of how PTV works is that you can't turn it off as it's assisting the rear diff at corner entry, so especially in corners that ask for a lot of rotation it's literally impossible to not trigger the PTV if you're driving at pace.

Another bizarre thing I used to monitor was the evenness of wear on the same pad, especially on the rears. If you do end up riding PSM/PTV all over the track in addition to regular track brake loads, it usually ends up with the brakes overheating at which point you might be going above the operating temps of the your pad compound and the leading edge of the pad starts melting a bit faster than the back side.

YMMV.
Old 03-03-2019, 07:55 PM
  #19  
usccharles
Pro
Thread Starter
 
usccharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Seoul, Korea
Posts: 685
Received 227 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

PSM on does wear out pads faster, especially the rears in my experience
Old 03-03-2019, 08:00 PM
  #20  
JSETarga
Burning Brakes
 
JSETarga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 973
Received 152 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by erko1905
You're probably doing fine. There's no way to not spend a boatload for brakes and tires in this specific activity (or maybe I couldn't find it), I'd get that thought out of your head to avoid future frustration

On the pad wear subject, I usually monitor, the front vs back, and the left vs right rear.

Ideally if you're mostly out of the PSM, you should probably be going with 2 or maybe 3 pairs of fronts per each pair of rears. Having to replace front vs back at the same frequency is one indicator of things not going so well.

The rear, left vs right, that could be a PTV thing, especially if you're going to tracks that are the same direction (clockwise or counterclockwise) all the time or going to a specific track that has a lot more right turns vs left (or vice versa). My understanding of how PTV works is that you can't turn it off as it's assisting the rear diff at corner entry, so especially in corners that ask for a lot of rotation it's literally impossible to not trigger the PTV if you're driving at pace.

Another bizarre thing I used to monitor was the evenness of wear on the same pad, especially on the rears. If you do end up riding PSM/PTV all over the track in addition to regular track brake loads, it usually ends up with the brakes overheating at which point you might be going above the operating temps of the your pad compound and the leading edge of the pad starts melting a bit faster than the back side.

YMMV.
That makes a lot of sense! Thanks
Old 03-05-2019, 03:16 AM
  #21  
usccharles
Pro
Thread Starter
 
usccharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Seoul, Korea
Posts: 685
Received 227 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Cole
I have never felt endangered by driving with PSM. I grew up with 600hp+ V8 cars with live axles. The 911 is composed, polite and refined by comparison, no matter its power. I've had it more than a little sideways but adding some throttle and steering out of the slide got the car right back in line with no additional drama (on track obviously).
Which 911 are you driving? My .2 4 GTS PSM will light up and hold the car back with any sign of going sideways.
Old 03-05-2019, 10:50 AM
  #22  
Steve Cole
Racer
 
Steve Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 459
Received 59 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

991.2 Turbo S. I meant to say "without." Usually the first thing I do when I get into my car is turn PSM to "sport chassis." As far as I know it still does some intervention but it's very minimal.
Old 03-05-2019, 11:12 AM
  #23  
usccharles
Pro
Thread Starter
 
usccharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Seoul, Korea
Posts: 685
Received 227 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Cole
991.2 Turbo S. I meant to say "without." Usually the first thing I do when I get into my car is turn PSM to "sport chassis." As far as I know it still does some intervention but it's very minimal.
thanks for the correction. PSM Sport definitely gives a alot of room to slide
Old 03-05-2019, 11:16 AM
  #24  
Al.Fresco
Three Wheelin'
 
Al.Fresco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,852
Received 327 Likes on 187 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Cole
Usually the first thing I do when I get into my car is turn PSM to "sport chassis." As far as I know it still does some intervention but it's very minimal.
Are you confusing PSM with PASM?

Old 03-05-2019, 03:09 PM
  #25  
Mark993TT
Racer
 
Mark993TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Probably.
Old 03-05-2019, 03:32 PM
  #26  
stout
Rennlist Member
 
stout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ^ The Bay Bridge
Posts: 4,872
Received 1,266 Likes on 590 Posts
Default

PSM Sport on when available, PSM on in cases where it isn't. It's rare that I choose PSM off (mainly due to inside rear wheel slip that's bad enough that the considerable benefit of PSM is outweighed).

I find that PSM doesn't interfere much if ever with my driving style, allowing for a bit of slip angle and/or leaving it to me to make corrections before it intervenes. If I wanted to be big sideways, that would be another matter—but rear pads are cheap compared to bodywork or worse. There are plenty of very experienced drivers who have wadded up really nice cars without PSM. I bet they wished they had it in those instances…
Old 07-09-2019, 11:20 AM
  #27  
byroncheung
Instructor
 
byroncheung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: New York
Posts: 229
Received 40 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

hi i'm picking up a 997.2 c2s pdk with sport chrono plus soon, and i'm trying to learn about the car settings before it arrive.

came from a e90 m3 with dct, where the suspension hardness, level of stability control, throttle mapping, and dct shift strategy can all be configured independently.

looking at the 997.2 controls, seems like pasm has a separate button, and psm has a separate button to turn it completely off, regardless of if the car is on normal / sport / sport+

but lets say i'm just driving on public roads, if i want to have the pdk on the most aggressive / fastest shift setting (to enjoy some nice downshift rev-matching noise and a little kick in the back up-shift), and psm on the most conservative / safe settings (which i think is responsible whenever driving on public roads), and conservative / linear throttle mapping (i feel that all these aggressive throttle mapping makes throttle modulation harder, and prefer more linear mapping), looks like it is not doable? because only way to put pdk in aggressive mode will be using sport / sport+, which will at the same time enable aggressive throttle mapping and aggressive psm mode?
Old 07-11-2019, 12:03 AM
  #28  
drcollie
Race Car
 
drcollie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fairfax County, Virginia
Posts: 4,023
Received 3,877 Likes on 1,358 Posts
Default

I've been driving 911's aggressively for 44 years now and been an instructor since 1996. So I grew up on cars that had no computer input, it was all seat-of-the-pants. If you allow me to go back into the Good Old Days, I can tell you of all the cars I have track driven, a 911 was the most diabolical by a large margin. With that engine hanging over the rear, a sloppy driver, or one who didn't understand the dynamics of that layout, the car would bit you in the butt if you mis-handled it. Look at 911 wrecks from the 70's / 80's / 90's and you will see more are ***-end-first hits because owners would lift going hard into a corner. The rears on these early cars would snap around and go back-end-first into the Armco. HOWEVER - once you learned to drive a 911, you could really make them move and nothing could stop with them raging up to a corner, as all that weight in the back gave you ten or twenty more feet into the corner when hard on the brakes. But a lot of people did wreck their Porsches, it was a real issue.

Modern Porsches have tamed-out these handling characteristics with much improved suspensions and electronics to save the driver from mistakes. With everything engages, you can ham-fist a modern 911 around a track with little consequence. When you start turning things off however, some of those old rear-end-swap-happy characteristics come back into play. My advice then, is to leave the electronics ON until you learn the car well. And going 90 mph into a corner is not that place. Go to some autocrosses, where the speeds are half that and turn off the electronics there - see how the car feels. Orange cones are far more forgiving than Armco. Once you have it mastered at autocross, then start disabling the electrics at the track. Unless you have Torque Vectoring or AWD on your 911, you'll find you'll be spinning that inside rear pretty quickly with everything off anyways. I always disable my electronics on track days, though sometimes I forget and can be heard swearing under my helmet about it...lol
The following 3 users liked this post by drcollie:
BGLeduc (07-11-2019), Rennolazine (07-11-2019), usccharles (07-12-2019)
Old 07-11-2019, 12:21 AM
  #29  
Rennolazine
Rennlist Member
 
Rennolazine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Chitown, USA
Posts: 3,005
Received 706 Likes on 425 Posts
Default

PSM sport can be really fun, but its almost like nothing is there to stop you if youre too hot on a corner. Once the booty lets go, its chris harris time and its scary. I can control a slide at low speed but not track speed if the back end snapped out. I leave psm on mostly but it punishes the rear brakes. I feel like psm sport is a good way to get your agricultural driver’s license if youre going full send and not greatly familiar with the track and its surfaces.

Last edited by Rennolazine; 07-11-2019 at 12:01 PM.
Old 07-11-2019, 11:26 AM
  #30  
eltoshan
Advanced
 
eltoshan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 67
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I do PSM off at autox, but leave it on for track days. I am not brave enough on track to turn it off, especially when the consequence is going into a tire wall. And honestly the only time I feel it intervening is when I turn in too early and fast, and the rear starts to come around too fast, at that point I’m off of the line I want to be on anyway. Corner exits are easy enough to open your hands up early and stay ahead of the rear tires.


Quick Reply: 991ers who go track PSM On, Sport, or Off?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:38 AM.